ImageImage

A Very Specific Plan to Trade & Replace Jeff Teague

Moderators: Jamaaliver, dms269, HMFFL

User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,005
And1: 17,106
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: A Very Specific Plan to Trade & Replace Jeff Teague 

Post#21 » by Jamaaliver » Fri Jun 12, 2015 6:27 pm

PandaKidd wrote:Lets just boil it down, this team, as currently constructed, isnt winning a title.

We won 60 games after going INSANE in January. We have another 30 game sample that shows us more of a .500 team. I believe we are more a 4-5 seed than a #1 ECF Team.

Teague, IMO, is the BEST trade asset, and the LEAST key piece to our success...

trading Teague would mean we got significantly better at another position


Bingo!!!

+1000

PandaKidd wrote:Trading Teague for the #4 pick to me is kind of dumb because I dont believe in Rookies and neither does Bud...


Oh, I was with you all the way until the very...last...sentence... The trading for a top pick thing is a long term move. If we can get +$30 million in cap space to build a superteam AND get the next Paul George/Kawhi/Dirk...I'd think that was a no-brainer.


Rip2137 wrote:And we are a championship caliber team...


And this is where we differ. Championship caliber teams don't get swept...

We start next season at 0-0. I do not believe next year's Eastern Conference is this bad. I don't believe we get back to the ECF with this same roster. We looked unbeatable in January. But titles aren't won in January.

In the playoffs we struggled against inferior teams, and were destroyed by the single elite team we played.

If you believe keeping the same core allows us to go 17-0 in a month again, or nets 4 All Stars or gets 60 wins and first place...I think it's naïve. Everyone else is aiming to get better this summer. We have to do the same.

We don't start next season in 1st place. We start 0-0. And Pat Riley and Larry Bird and Phil Jackson are all just plotting a way to steal our players, our model, our place in the standings.
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,005
And1: 17,106
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: A Very Specific Plan to Trade & Replace Jeff Teague 

Post#22 » by Jamaaliver » Fri Jun 12, 2015 6:40 pm

Rip2137 wrote:You are saying throw on the towel after a 60 win season and ECF appearance. You are saying toss it in and look to get back to this level in a few years. That is INSANE.


FTR, that's NOT what I am saying at all. I'm saying be aggressive in improving the team. Moving Teague for a draft picks gives us $30 million+ in cap space to build a super team AND get the next Kawhi Leonard.

Two top Free Agents and a young superstar are certainly worth Jeff Teague, right?


You are watching the finals. James is getting monster numbers, Thompson is killing the boards...Golden State is fairing about as well as us and they are healthy.


No, cause their talent is carrying them. Being tied 2-2 after 4 games is very different than being swept 0-4.

Seriously.

GSW is 2 games from a title today because they are built around a young superstar, All Stars and experienced vets.
SAS won a title last year because they are built around a young superstar, All Stars and experienced vets.

That's what we need to truly compete for the next decade...
User avatar
PandaKidd
Analyst
Posts: 3,356
And1: 637
Joined: Aug 22, 2012
     

Re: A Very Specific Plan to Trade & Replace Jeff Teague 

Post#23 » by PandaKidd » Fri Jun 12, 2015 7:01 pm

My only point was trading Teague for the #4 PIck (which im not sure even the NYK would even consider), That means we are taking a WCS or something. Has to be a BIG, no way you trade a PG for a PG. I mean maybe a Winslow but Im hesitant to trade away All Star Production for a rookie who played a VERY SMALL sample size.

Also the trading of teague for something like a #4 pick means the other parts of the roster are in transition as well. There are MANY dominoes to fall if that scenario played out.
Rip2137
Analyst
Posts: 3,317
And1: 228
Joined: Jun 24, 2006

Re: A Very Specific Plan to Trade & Replace Jeff Teague 

Post#24 » by Rip2137 » Fri Jun 12, 2015 7:15 pm

You know full well I posted that when the Series was 2-1 and one shot from being 3-0. Dont come in with hindsight after the last game and say "see".

And how in the world does me saying we need to get better NOT improving the team? I will repeat since you missed it...We need better play from our backup point, be it Dennis or trade him, a better starting 2 guard, and variety in talent in our back up bigs. That's not keeping things as is in the slightest. But you aren't looking to upgrade, you are talking reset. None of these upgrades can be "they will totally contribute in 4 years".

IDK why you keep pretending the draft isn't a crapshoot with a higher percentage of fails than wins.

Panda, as for Teague not being top Ten, you have to do this thing where you just ignore his actual play for his perceived weakness. Teague literally had a top ten year at his position in the NBA. You want to take that away...um...because...because. I would love to see this list of 10 point guards that had a better season than Jeff.

To say our best player was the least key piece to our success...i don't even know where to begin with the absurdity of that.
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,005
And1: 17,106
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: A Very Specific Plan to Trade & Replace Jeff Teague 

Post#25 » by Jamaaliver » Fri Jun 12, 2015 7:45 pm

Rip2137 wrote:You know full well I posted that when the Series was 2-1 and one shot from being 3-0. Dont come in with hindsight after the last game and say "see".


:x

Seriously. Being down 2-1 in the Finals the same not the same as getting swept in the Conf Finals. One day. One Game doesn't change anything. GSW and CLE are on a higher tier from us because they have more talent. Period.

Also, you saying something crazy on Wednesday and then being proven wrong 24 hours later isn't using hindsight. You said a dumb thing. Own up to it.

There is no excuse for not using all our resources to massively improve the roster. Especially when our much maligned GM acquired this flexibility for the sole purpose of massively improving the roster.

This summer is largely the only chance we have for years to fully construct any starting 5 we want.

And after seeing our team fall apart last year when Horford was out and Teague proved unable to carry us anywhere...I'm disappointed to hear you say Teague is our best player.

He refused to go back into a crucial fourth quarter of a playoff game because the backup PG (in the midst of a terrible stretch of basketball) was outplaying him.

If Teague was replaced tomorrow by Ty Lawson or Mike Conley, or Isaiah Thomas, or Goran Dragic, we wouldn't miss a beat...
User avatar
PandaKidd
Analyst
Posts: 3,356
And1: 637
Joined: Aug 22, 2012
     

Re: A Very Specific Plan to Trade & Replace Jeff Teague 

Post#26 » by PandaKidd » Fri Jun 12, 2015 7:53 pm

Rip2137 wrote:
Panda, as for Teague not being top Ten, you have to do this thing where you just ignore his actual play for his perceived weakness. Teague literally had a top ten year at his position in the NBA. You want to take that away...um...because...because. I would love to see this list of 10 point guards that had a better season than Jeff.


1 Year of production, and making some all time dumb decisions in CRITICAL games doesnt leap frog him past:
Kyrie Irving
Chris Paul
Conley
Westbrook
Wall
Harden
Curry

I dont view him as a top 10 PG, he had stretches where he was absolutely in the conversation, and then when i look back at the totality of this season, I saw alot of BAD Teague when it mattered. The last shot vs the Wizards where he couldnt even get a shot off and the last shot vs Lebron where he couldnt figure out what to do. Im sorry, I KNOW WHO TEAGUE IS, hes a guy that WOWS YOU for 20 games, and then plays 2 games to eliminate you in the playoffs where he does **** that makes no sense.

To say our best player was the least key piece to our success...i don't even know where to begin with the absurdity of that.

If your best player is Teague, then, like I said, good luck winning a championship. Hes not an ELITE player.
User avatar
D21
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,573
And1: 688
Joined: Sep 09, 2005

Re: A Very Specific Plan to Trade & Replace Jeff Teague 

Post#27 » by D21 » Fri Jun 12, 2015 9:27 pm

PandaKidd wrote:... I think this team severely overachieved in the Regular Season. YOu saw that in the playoffs when bench staples like Scott/Bazemore/Pero etc couldnt score to save their lives. DS looked as unprepared as ever


I disagree on this point, because it was easy to know that these four guys wouldn't produce in the playoffs : they were not key players in the regular season, they were all in big negative +/- , except Antic at +2 but it was like +15 during the first part of the season and negative the rest of the season.

Only Korver, Millsap, Sefolosha, Teague and Horford (unlike Antic, he was bad in the first part, then good for the rest of the season) were in positive +/-

It simply shows that our bench was not good. It's not our starters. Note that Carroll was at -2, and even if he's a good player, I still think that his playoffs performance is a bit overrated because Teague, Millsap and Horford were playing injured so they played more for him.
Rip2137
Analyst
Posts: 3,317
And1: 228
Joined: Jun 24, 2006

Re: A Very Specific Plan to Trade & Replace Jeff Teague 

Post#28 » by Rip2137 » Fri Jun 12, 2015 9:29 pm

Jamaaliver wrote:
Rip2137 wrote:You know full well I posted that when the Series was 2-1 and one shot from being 3-0. Dont come in with hindsight after the last game and say "see".


:x

Seriously. Being down 2-1 in the Finals the same not the same as getting swept in the Conf Finals. One day. One Game doesn't change anything. GSW and CLE are on a higher tier from us because they have more talent. Period.

Also, you saying something crazy on Wednesday and then being proven wrong 24 hours later isn't using hindsight. You said a dumb thing. Own up to it.

There is no excuse for not using all our resources to massively improve the roster. Especially when our much maligned GM acquired this flexibility for the sole purpose of massively improving the roster.

This summer is largely the only chance we have for years to fully construct any starting 5 we want.

And after seeing our team fall apart last year when Horford was out and Teague proved unable to carry us anywhere...I'm disappointed to hear you say Teague is our best player.

He refused to go back into a crucial fourth quarter of a playoff game because the backup PG (in the midst of a terrible stretch of basketball) was outplaying him.

If Teague was replaced tomorrow by Ty Lawson or Mike Conley, or Isaiah Thomas, or Goran Dragic, we wouldn't miss a beat...


So, just so we are clear, you are saying that prior to last night the Warriors were NOT struggling with the Cleveland Cavs and they weren’t one shot away from being down 3-0 in the series(just like we magically weren’t 1 shot away from being down 2-1 in the series after 3 games.) You are telling me THAT didn’t happen? And basically every article written in every publication before game 4 was a lie too…I guess. I notice you didn’t MENTION it until the Warriors got it together in game 4 though…and oddly they got it together by going smaller and getting big contributions from their defensive minded backup 2/3 man and their back-up point guard….something we didn’t have.
Again…and I don’t know how to stress this more…YOU HAVE NOT SUGGESTED MASSIVELY IMPROVING OUR ROSTER. You have suggested making it WORSE and gambling that someone who has never played a minute of NBA basketball will have a good roster a few years from now. Your suggestion has been, basically, “Give up after massive improvement of year two of the system…it clearly isn’t going to work.”
As for the “refusal” to go back in the game…that’s HILARIOUS. Teague was outplaying Schroder that night, Schroder and the crew on the court had a run going and Schroder was playing some good D on Beal at the time. Schroder shot us out of game one against Cleveland, almost cost us the first FOUR games of the Nets series. But lets forget that…lets try to downplay Teague.
And the team didn’t just lose Horford. They lost 3 centers, Millsap, Korver, Carroll and Lou Williams for a stretch. And they still made the playoffs and SHOULD have beaten the number 1 seed if not for some super boneheaded plays out of Lou Williams. But again…ignore what REALLY happened.

But just so we are clear. I am saying TRADE TEAGUE IF IT MAKES US BETTER. But you have not suggested ANYTHING that would make us better. You just keep saying “hey we can just draft the next Kawi Leonard!” which is just as likely as saying “lets just move up to the 13 pick and take the next Kobe Bryant or Karl Malone!” or hey, Nash and Leonard got picked at 15 so it must be super easy…let’s just do that again.
Again, you are suggesting what NO OTHER TEAM would ever do. You don’t find that a bit weird?

PandaKidd wrote:
Rip2137 wrote:
Panda, as for Teague not being top Ten, you have to do this thing where you just ignore his actual play for his perceived weakness. Teague literally had a top ten year at his position in the NBA. You want to take that away...um...because...because. I would love to see this list of 10 point guards that had a better season than Jeff.


1 Year of production, and making some all time dumb decisions in CRITICAL games doesnt leap frog him past:
Kyrie Irving
Chris Paul
Conley
Westbrook
Wall
Harden
Curry

I dont view him as a top 10 PG, he had stretches where he was absolutely in the conversation, and then when i look back at the totality of this season, I saw alot of BAD Teague when it mattered. The last shot vs the Wizards where he couldnt even get a shot off and the last shot vs Lebron where he couldnt figure out what to do. Im sorry, I KNOW WHO TEAGUE IS, hes a guy that WOWS YOU for 20 games, and then plays 2 games to eliminate you in the playoffs where he does **** that makes no sense.

To say our best player was the least key piece to our success...i don't even know where to begin with the absurdity of that.

If your best player is Teague, then, like I said, good luck winning a championship. Hes not an ELITE player.


Panda…love you man, but this is pretty ridiculous. You are SEROIUSLY saying that we should downgrade Teague for a game where he LITERALLY CARRIED US because he, lets be honest, missed a shot against the Cavs. He literally hit EVERY big shot, played huge in EVERY big game in these playoffs. He was the key to the win in game 5 against the Nets when it looked like it was going to be a loss. He played huge in the close out game. He played led the way to close out game 4 against the Wizards and AGAIN in game 6 and made every play needed to win.
He then was the only one to show up in the Cavs series. From that you somehow came up with “bad Teague showed up when it mattered”. You are just, simply, factually wrong and there are game logs, tapes and videos to show it. You just said that the guy that hit every key 4th quarter shot and led us in scoring in game 3 against the Cavs did nothing right because he missed a three at the buzzer basically. He basically took the same shot Lebron took at the end of game one of the finals. If it goes, he is the hero, but since it didn’t he MAGICALLY didn’t carry that team in that game.
And…not to be nitpicky, you realize you just named 6 point guards. So even if you toss in Parker, Rose and Lillard(all of whom Jeff had a better year than, by the way) He still would be number 10 in the league. I don’t see how you don’t think we have a top 10 PG.
We have a point guard that is going into his 5th year as a starter and has had his two best seasons in the current system we have. In the SINGLE year we had a relatively healthy team, he was the key part of a 60 win team and even though he was injured in the playoffs, still played the biggest at the biggest moments and got us to the ECF.
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,005
And1: 17,106
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: A Very Specific Plan to Trade & Replace Jeff Teague 

Post#29 » by Jamaaliver » Fri Jun 12, 2015 10:27 pm

Rip2137 wrote:Again…and I don’t know how to stress this more…YOU HAVE NOT SUGGESTED MASSIVELY IMPROVING OUR ROSTER. You have suggested making it WORSE and gambling that someone who has never played a minute of NBA basketball will have a good roster a few years from now.


I honestly don't know if you're a liar or simply don't read before typing in a blind rage based on the headline alone:

Page 1 of the whole thread. Post 2:

Jamaaliver wrote:We move Teague and #15 for #4 and Tim Hardaway Jr. This clears up additional cap space...

With more than $30 million in cap space now available, we can either bring back the rest of the core in Millsap and Demarre while adding vet PG Jameer Nelson. Or we could build a proper roster: Robin Lopez-Horford-Demarre-Wes Mathews-Jameer while adding Hardaway, Korver and top young player to a much improved bench.

Whether you think this team is on the verge and just needs tweaks, or if you want to utilize all this cap space to build the ideal roster: this is the time to do it.


But let's be honest, there no suggestion I could make that you wouldn't scoff at...


Rip2137 wrote:James is getting monster numbers, Thompson is killing the boards...Golden State is fairing about as well as us and they are healthy. Is it time to trade key contributors?


You said something. It is wrong. Flat out wrong. No excuses. No caveats. Just own up to it.

Just...say...the words...
User avatar
Hawk Eye
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,819
And1: 2,073
Joined: May 28, 2014

Re: A Very Specific Plan to Trade & Replace Jeff Teague 

Post#30 » by Hawk Eye » Fri Jun 12, 2015 11:28 pm

Hate to butt in to the argument between Rip & Jamaal here but I posted this on the first page of this thread that Jamaaliver created and 3 fellow Hawks users on this board liked it. So I'm assuming they agree with me but I really wanted Jamaal to give his thoughts on my post (since he created this thread) as I don't feel his plan to replace Teague with Jameer Nelson improves our team right now.

PMOTT3 wrote:Couple of things..

1. Teague + #15 is not enough to jump up into the KAT, Okafor, Russell, Mudiay tier. Even if we attached the heavily protected MIN pick from the A. Payne trade. We also wouldn't get any extra cap space because NYK wouldn't even consider it if they can't dump Calderon on us.

2. Jameer Nelson is a backup PG at this stage of his career. He's a good 3 point shooter and can generally run an offense well but he's a walking turnstyle on defense. He wasn't able to close out on shooters and his lack of length/size/and athleticism really got to him this year. Ask any Mavs fan how Jameer did for them in his short stint with them (I personally asked ChuckTexas a Mavericks fan and user on RealGM that I trust, and what he said is along the lines of what I stated about him in this post.)

I'm not apposed to trading Teague but we have to get similar production or extremely close to what Teague gave us at the PG position in order for us to win 50+ games next season. Jameer Nelson and Dennis Schröder can't provide that as starters imo.
Rip2137
Analyst
Posts: 3,317
And1: 228
Joined: Jun 24, 2006

Re: A Very Specific Plan to Trade & Replace Jeff Teague 

Post#31 » by Rip2137 » Fri Jun 12, 2015 11:57 pm

Jamaaliver wrote:
Rip2137 wrote:Again…and I don’t know how to stress this more…YOU HAVE NOT SUGGESTED MASSIVELY IMPROVING OUR ROSTER. You have suggested making it WORSE and gambling that someone who has never played a minute of NBA basketball will have a good roster a few years from now.


I honestly don't know if you're a liar or simply don't read before typing in a blind rage based on the headline alone:

Page 1 of the whole thread. Post 2:

Jamaaliver wrote:We move Teague and #15 for #4 and Tim Hardaway Jr. This clears up additional cap space...

With more than $30 million in cap space now available, we can either bring back the rest of the core in Millsap and Demarre while adding vet PG Jameer Nelson. Or we could build a proper roster: Robin Lopez-Horford-Demarre-Wes Mathews-Jameer while adding Hardaway, Korver and top young player to a much improved bench.

Whether you think this team is on the verge and just needs tweaks, or if you want to utilize all this cap space to build the ideal roster: this is the time to do it.


But let's be honest, there no suggestion I could make that you wouldn't scoff at...


Rip2137 wrote:James is getting monster numbers, Thompson is killing the boards...Golden State is fairing about as well as us and they are healthy. Is it time to trade key contributors?


You said something. It is wrong. Flat out wrong. No excuses. No caveats. Just own up to it.

Just...say...the words...


1: dear...god...

So in this dream scenario, we have let Millsap walk... and we have convinced Lopez and Matthews to sign here. But we would have the money to sign them ANYWAY without the capspace from trading Teague. So basically you are now saying Jameer Nelson + Tim Hardaway Jr. + some random young player is a massive upgrade. Jameer Nelson + Dennis Schroder starting is a MASSIVE downgrade from Teague/Schroder.

So please, sir, explain to me how this plan, 90% of that can be accomplished without moving Teague, is a MASSIVE UPGRADE over our roster now?

Your other scenario there is simply add Tim Hardaway and Jameer Nelson with a rookie while everything else stays the same. HOW IS THAT A UPGRADE?

2: You realize the word IS means present right? So after 3 games, was Golden State fairing much better than us? The difference between them being down 3-0 after 3 (just like us) and 2-1 was one point. So they were fairing better than us. Not by much. So please explain to me, when Golden State was losing the first two of 3 and escaped with a overtime victory in the other, how they were fairing SO much better than we were after 3 games. PLEASE.

Golden State turned to their depth to win game 4. I have been advocating this whole thread that we don't need to tear it down but add more depth so we can compete like they are. I don't think you bringing that up is working the way you think.

But most of all, I was the one that has suggested trading Teague MULTIPLE times when we were a middling team. I suggested Horford AND Teague for Westbrook and Collison. I suggested moving Teague for Nash and the Lakers lottery pick..when we were no where near a championship. I have no real attachment to any player. I have a attachment to the Hawks. This isn't about not moving Teague, this is about your suggestion not making us better and throwing in the towel way too early.

You can't POSSIBLY think we are closer to a losing team than a championship team right now. You simply CAN'T think that, so why do you want to make moves like a losing team NOW.

If Teague, Horford and the 15 got me Conley and Gasol in a sign and trade, I would make that move IMMEDIATELY. I'm not making the team worse just because you think that we reached our ceiling despite half of our 8 man playoff rotation being seriously injuried.
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,005
And1: 17,106
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: A Very Specific Plan to Trade & Replace Jeff Teague 

Post#32 » by Jamaaliver » Fri Jun 12, 2015 11:57 pm

PMOTT3 wrote:Hate to butt in to the argument between Rip & Jamaal here but I posted this on the first page of this thread that Jamaaliver created and 3 fellow Hawks users on this board liked it. So I'm assuming they agree with me but I really wanted Jamaal to give his thoughts on my post (since he created this thread) as I don't feel his plan to replace Teague with Jameer Nelson improves our team right now.


Never a problem. PK mentioned a few posts earlier than any Teague trade would obviously result in strengthening other parts of the roster. That's my ultimate goal.

I have mentioned a few times in the past losing one of your top players makes you a completely different team with different weaknesses and strengths. That's what I envision: a bigger, deeper, more veteran laden team.

All of your criticisms of J Nelson are accurate. But we must remember how dominant Dallas' offense was with him as the starter. Jameer would simply be a placeholder, mentor and platoon mate at PG while Dennis takes another step forward. (The leap he made from year 1 to year 2 was huge. Even bigger than I predicted. I expect another great leap as well next season.)

But the improvement comes from focusing on other positions. Adding Robin provides size while improving rebounding and interior defense. Acquiring Wes Mathews improves perimeter scoring and defense. Moving KK to the bench strengthens the second unit.

Those were the biggest weaknesses in the roster construction during the year and the playoffs. Lack of size, lack of bench scoring, a wing player capable of getting a bucket on his own.

Against CLE, we only scored 90 points once. And that was an OT game.

On top of that, adding a young player like D Russell gives us a young star that we can groom for PG or SG of the future.

Also, Horford and Lopez would dominate tiny frontcourts in the East.
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,005
And1: 17,106
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: A Very Specific Plan to Trade & Replace Jeff Teague 

Post#33 » by Jamaaliver » Sat Jun 13, 2015 1:06 am

Rip2137 wrote:
1: dear...god...

So in this dream scenario, we have let Millsap walk...


<sigh>

Let's just stick a pin in it. Bud will likely re-sign this entire core at all costs.

We'll play it out and see how things go. If Teague and Millsap lead us to game 6 of the EC Finals...we'll call it a fantastic off-season and postseason.

But if we lose in the first or second round next year, or get swept again in the ECF....well. We'll revisit.

But I expressed my concern in a post three months ago:

Jamaaliver wrote:If we lose in the 2nd round, or if we get swept in the EC Finals...I'm not certain bringing back the same pieces for next season gets us closer to winning a title. I simply think Noah and AL could be a great place to begin retooling the roster.

It all comes down how this team fares in the post-season. If we bow out in game 4 or 5 of any series....I would look to upgrade and retool. Not simply maintain the status quo.


I stand by my words. This roster is flawed. This is our last chance to drastically improve without tanking or blowing it all up.
Rip2137
Analyst
Posts: 3,317
And1: 228
Joined: Jun 24, 2006

Re: A Very Specific Plan to Trade & Replace Jeff Teague 

Post#34 » by Rip2137 » Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:29 am

I feel like you are purposely being dense here. You just stopped the quote there like I am saying hang on to Millsap. My point is your best scenario features Matthews and Lopez. If we let Millsap go we can have them without having to trade anyone else...thats my point the only add on in your scenario that has something to do with Teague is unnamed rookie and Tim hardaway Jr. And involves us signing Jameer nelson.
MaceCase
General Manager
Posts: 8,363
And1: 2,483
Joined: Apr 08, 2009
       

Re: A Very Specific Plan to Trade & Replace Jeff Teague 

Post#35 » by MaceCase » Sat Jun 13, 2015 5:18 am

The irony in all of this is that Jeff Teague was the 19th pick and apparently is now returning you the 4th pick in the draft and his replacements, of course, are the 17th pick in the draft and the ghost of Mike Bibby and they are apparently poised to takeover and lead the way on an Eastern contender.

Somehow this becomes a logical reason and impetus to trade into the lottery rather than.........you know, having every confidence that you can build upon a 60 win ECF squad with all of the assets already available to you.
*WLONC*
We Like Our New Core
User avatar
PandaKidd
Analyst
Posts: 3,356
And1: 637
Joined: Aug 22, 2012
     

 

Post#36 » by PandaKidd » Sat Jun 13, 2015 2:53 pm

Sigh

Ok yes or no answers. Would you rather have these lineups hypothetically:

Jameer Nelson
Korver
Carroll
Horford
Gasol
Yes or no

Nelson
Matthews
Carroll
Millsap
Horford

Nelson
Korver
Carroll
Horford
WCS

Nelson
Korver
Carroll
Horford
Lopez (robin or Brook)

I'm 100% against bringing back the exact same starting 5. They aren't good enough rebounding and on defense.

All we are discussing is trading our best trade asset to upgrade other positions , which could be a domino effect combine with FA.

now Jamaal likes trying to get into the top 5 lottery, I'm not in favor of that because the draft is a crap shoot. Trading teague and #15 likely won't get you in the top 5 IMO .

Ideally I'd be ok with TEAGUE if we got Matthews/ Gasol / LMA etc. Thats prob NOT happening.
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,005
And1: 17,106
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: A Very Specific Plan to Trade & Replace Jeff Teague 

Post#37 » by Jamaaliver » Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:10 pm

:banghead:
Rip2137 wrote:I feel like you are purposely being dense here. You just stopped the quote there like I am saying hang on to Millsap. My point is your best scenario features Matthews and Lopez. If we let Millsap go we can have them without having to trade anyone else...thats my point the only add on in your scenario that has something to do with Teague is unnamed rookie and Tim hardaway Jr. And involves us signing Jameer nelson.


What I'm proposing is using Teague as a trade chip to provide us $30 million in cap space and a top (6?) draft pick. This allows us to rebuild the roster to our liking, shoring up every weakness in the process.

I don't believe we can retain Demarre and sign Robin and Wes with only $25+ million in cap space. Trading Teague gets you over the $30 million mark in cap space.

Now, whether yo want to pursue D Wade and LMA for a super team, retain our own Free Agents and add depth, or be bold and just pursue Gasol...the $30 million is necessary for further improvement.

We dominated January. But May showed a lot of cracks. BRK held there own through five games. WAS took the series lead over and over again. CLE dominated us.

The whole point of this thread, is we can't stand pat after one good season. I'm okay getting less production from the PG position for a year if it massively improves the frontcourt and bench and wing positions as a result.

Side note: GSW struggles with CLE are similar to our struggles with the Wizards through 3 games. Not our destruction at the hands of CLE...
Rip2137
Analyst
Posts: 3,317
And1: 228
Joined: Jun 24, 2006

Re: A Very Specific Plan to Trade & Replace Jeff Teague 

Post#38 » by Rip2137 » Sat Jun 13, 2015 5:59 pm

Letting Demarre and Millsap walk, giving 11 to Matthews and 8-9 to Lopez(honestly think that is going yo be a overpay for both of them) going with a wing in the draft, starting Thabo and still having some money to play with and I think you are much better off than your scenario.

All I am saying is that if you are trading Teague, you better be upgrading the position(Conley) or going at least equal UNLESS you are getting a massive upgrade somewhere else. And I don't see a massive upgrade anywhere else in the scenarios suggested.
User avatar
PandaKidd
Analyst
Posts: 3,356
And1: 637
Joined: Aug 22, 2012
     

Re: Re: A Very Specific Plan to Trade &amp; Replace Jeff Teague 

Post#39 » by PandaKidd » Sat Jun 13, 2015 6:37 pm

Rip2137 wrote:Letting Demarre and Millsap walk, giving 11 to Matthews and 8-9 to Lopez(honestly think that is going yo be a overpay for both of them) going with a wing in the draft, starting Thabo and still having some money to play with and I think you are much better off than your scenario.

All I am saying is that if you are trading Teague, you better be upgrading the position(Conley) or going at least equal UNLESS you are getting a massive upgrade somewhere else. And I don't see a massive upgrade anywhere else in the scenarios suggested.


I thought that's all we were trying to say? At least I was.

Trading teague only makes sense if you land a PREMIER upgrade at another position. That's what I meant when I said I value PG less than say a top tier SG or SF/C.

I believe our system can work for a plethora of other PG options.
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,005
And1: 17,106
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: Re: A Very Specific Plan to Trade &amp; Replace Jeff Teague 

Post#40 » by Jamaaliver » Sat Jun 13, 2015 6:54 pm

PandaKidd wrote:I thought that's all we were trying to say? At least I was.

Trading teague only makes sense if you land a PREMIER upgrade at another position. That's what I meant when I said I value PG less than say a top tier SG or SF/C.

I believe our system can work for a plethora of other PG options.


Bingo. Well said, PK.

RIP, what you just proposed is brilliant. It definitely shores up weaknesses in the starting five...but it still leaves us cash strapped with a less than stellar bench.

I agree that starting five would be hell in our system in the east.

But an extra $8 million in cap space and a top draftee or two could go a long way towards solidifying the roster for 2016 and beyond. I'm thinking Porzingis, Dunleavy, Gary Neal, Koufos are the type of experienced bench mob we'll need. Those four (to me) are more valuable than just Jeff Teague.

Return to Atlanta Hawks