OKC Thunder Offseason 2015

Moderators: retrobro90, Dadouv47

Bravenewworld
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,617
And1: 934
Joined: Jul 02, 2010

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2015 

Post#201 » by Bravenewworld » Tue Jun 16, 2015 4:27 pm

Balkman32 wrote:
Bravenewworld wrote:Barnes would be a fantastic addition to this team.
We need a SF option behind KD. Just in case this foot thing continues to be an issue. Given our line up and what Donovan should be able to do as a coach, we dont need a star or superstar, but a guy like Barnes who is fully capable of producing with starter minutes, is a great defender, has tons of PO experience, and can offensively produce and give us a solid 10pt average, would be ideal.
We need more dirty work guys and Barnes would be perfect.


He is 35. That is really old. I don't know if he has another season left in the tank. He will join a playoff contender.


Eactly, and that team should be us. We could use the experience and dirty work he provides. Lets not forget that two of our most important players since contention had been Fisher and Collison. Two guys who are "really old". Barnes easily has another 3 years left. He has not been plagued by injury, had super high minutes, had dramatic decreases, etc.
He's perfect for us to go after, especially if we hit a scenario of KD needing down time.
Balkman32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,825
And1: 808
Joined: Jul 19, 2007
 

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2015 

Post#202 » by Balkman32 » Tue Jun 16, 2015 6:34 pm

Bravenewworld wrote:
Balkman32 wrote:
Bravenewworld wrote:Barnes would be a fantastic addition to this team.
We need a SF option behind KD. Just in case this foot thing continues to be an issue. Given our line up and what Donovan should be able to do as a coach, we dont need a star or superstar, but a guy like Barnes who is fully capable of producing with starter minutes, is a great defender, has tons of PO experience, and can offensively produce and give us a solid 10pt average, would be ideal.
We need more dirty work guys and Barnes would be perfect.


He is 35. That is really old. I don't know if he has another season left in the tank. He will join a playoff contender.


Eactly, and that team should be us. We could use the experience and dirty work he provides. Lets not forget that two of our most important players since contention had been Fisher and Collison. Two guys who are "really old". Barnes easily has another 3 years left. He has not been plagued by injury, had super high minutes, had dramatic decreases, etc.
He's perfect for us to go after, especially if we hit a scenario of KD needing down time.

But, he wont be here. Lets be real.
Bravenewworld
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,617
And1: 934
Joined: Jul 02, 2010

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2015 

Post#203 » by Bravenewworld » Tue Jun 16, 2015 7:44 pm

Why wouldnt it be realistic to think we could sign a guy who will most likely sign for an MLE contract?
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2015 

Post#204 » by bondom34 » Tue Jun 16, 2015 8:01 pm

If its an option, I'd rather Dunleavy.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Hbp3300
Ballboy
Posts: 9
And1: 0
Joined: May 26, 2015

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2015 

Post#205 » by Hbp3300 » Tue Jun 16, 2015 11:01 pm

I'd rather not sign Barnes... the roster is already loaded, he's really old, his shooting is really inconsistent, and they already have players on the roster that can do what he does.
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2015 

Post#206 » by spearsy23 » Wed Jun 17, 2015 2:41 am

I wouldn't dump any player on our roster for Barnes. If we had more open spots then I'd be meh about him, but unless we consolidate talent I'm not interested.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2015 

Post#207 » by bondom34 » Wed Jun 17, 2015 3:30 am

spearsy23 wrote:I wouldn't dump any player on our roster for Barnes. If we had more open spots then I'd be meh about him, but unless we consolidate talent I'm not interested.

Mostly agree, but I'd drop Novak.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2015 

Post#208 » by spearsy23 » Wed Jun 17, 2015 3:40 am

bondom34 wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:I wouldn't dump any player on our roster for Barnes. If we had more open spots then I'd be meh about him, but unless we consolidate talent I'm not interested.

Mostly agree, but I'd drop Novak.

Forgot about Novak, but I like that he has a clearly defined role. I think Singler is the better option as the backup 3 (we don't have a good offensive player on the bench so the more guys who have value offensively, the better), and we all know I have a hard-on for Robes. I just don't see Barnes as a need, but I also can't stand him in general, so it may be that talking.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2015 

Post#209 » by bondom34 » Wed Jun 17, 2015 3:44 am

spearsy23 wrote:
bondom34 wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:I wouldn't dump any player on our roster for Barnes. If we had more open spots then I'd be meh about him, but unless we consolidate talent I'm not interested.

Mostly agree, but I'd drop Novak.

Forgot about Novak, but I like that he has a clearly defined role. I think Singler is the better option as the backup 3 (we don't have a good offensive player on the bench so the more guys who have value offensively, the better), and we all know I have a hard-on for Robes. I just don't see Barnes as a need, but I also can't stand him in general, so it may be that talking.

I get the people hating him part, he's not likeable. I'm still hoping for Dunleavy somehow if they open a roster spot, and I'm maybe the only one who's as big a Robes fan as you (I may actually try to get an autograph).

Though I'm not sure Novak really has a "defined role".
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2015 

Post#210 » by spearsy23 » Wed Jun 17, 2015 3:50 am

bondom34 wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:
bondom34 wrote:Mostly agree, but I'd drop Novak.

Forgot about Novak, but I like that he has a clearly defined role. I think Singler is the better option as the backup 3 (we don't have a good offensive player on the bench so the more guys who have value offensively, the better), and we all know I have a hard-on for Robes. I just don't see Barnes as a need, but I also can't stand him in general, so it may be that talking.

I get the people hating him part, he's not likeable. I'm still hoping for Dunleavy somehow if they open a roster spot, and I'm maybe the only one who's as big a Robes fan as you (I may actually try to get an autograph).

Though I'm not sure Novak really has a "defined role".

Novak has a very clearly defined role, it's 'we're down by three with 5 seconds left, stand in the corner.' Outside of that he's perfectly happy riding the bench :lol:

I'd really like Dunleavy, probably more than Singler.

I really want a Robes jersey, if he's still starting this season I'm for sure getting one.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
Soonerule
Sophomore
Posts: 229
And1: 135
Joined: May 24, 2015
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2015 

Post#211 » by Soonerule » Wed Jun 17, 2015 11:03 pm

Maybe I'm nuts, but I wonder if Presti might like what we have. I say that because when I look at our lineup I see versatility. Russ, KD, and Serge are set as starters, period, but the other 2 spots could change based on the opponent. Both Kanter and Adams have said they don't care who starts and with Robes, Lamb, Waiters and Morrow, Donovan would have the luxury of going with the player with the best skill set based on who we are playing. We've got Collison and McGary backing up Serge, PJ should already be ready to back up KD, Singler if he's not, and Augustin backing up Westbrook.

If I'm right, it explains Presti's number one reason for making a coaching change. He has his team and he needed someone to utilize it better. Like I said, maybe I'm nuts.
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2015 

Post#212 » by spearsy23 » Thu Jun 18, 2015 12:47 am

Just once next season I want to see a Russ/KD/Serge/Kanter/Adams lineup against some team playing small ball. :lol:
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
Hobes
Senior
Posts: 554
And1: 136
Joined: Apr 04, 2010
Location: New York
   

 

Post#213 » by Hobes » Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:15 am

So there was discussion today on ESPN radio mentioning OKC trading Westbrook for the Knicks #4. I seriously can't believe this was even discussed...
User avatar
spearsy23
RealGM
Posts: 19,481
And1: 7,654
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
   

Re: 

Post#214 » by spearsy23 » Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:39 am

Hobes wrote:So there was discussion today on ESPN radio mentioning OKC trading Westbrook for the Knicks #4. I seriously can't believe this was even discussed...

Was Simmons involved?

Seriously, where do they get this crap? Why would a team trade the guy who possibly just had the best season in the NBA for a draft pick?
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
User avatar
NaturalThunder
General Manager
Posts: 8,491
And1: 3,907
Joined: Jun 13, 2012
     

Re: 

Post#215 » by NaturalThunder » Thu Jun 18, 2015 3:34 am

Hobes wrote:So there was discussion today on ESPN radio mentioning OKC trading Westbrook for the Knicks #4. I seriously can't believe this was even discussed...

:lol:

Presti wouldn't have even entertained the thought of trading Westbrook after his 15-5-5 49% TS rookie season, or his 16-8-5 49% TS second season if it could have netted him the #4 pick in the draft. Why in the world would he consider doing it after his 28-9-7 54% TS 2015 season? Russ essentially did what LeBron did in the playoffs, just with fewer points but a +7% TS advantage, but instead of doing it in a 6-game series, he did it over the course of half a season or so and dang near led an OKC team decimated by injuries to the playoffs in an uber-competitive Western Conference.
Said in a thread about which point guards would make OKC better if they replaced Westbrook:
Coxy wrote:I think with a PG like George Hill, they'd be better than current.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Re: 

Post#216 » by bondom34 » Thu Jun 18, 2015 4:40 am

NaturalThunder wrote:
Hobes wrote:So there was discussion today on ESPN radio mentioning OKC trading Westbrook for the Knicks #4. I seriously can't believe this was even discussed...

:lol:

Presti wouldn't have even entertained the thought of trading Westbrook after his 15-5-5 49% TS rookie season, or his 16-8-5 49% TS second season if it could have netted him the #4 pick in the draft. Why in the world would he consider doing it after his 28-9-7 54% TS 2015 season? Russ essentially did what LeBron did in the playoffs, just with fewer points but a +7% TS advantage, but instead of doing it in a 6-game series, he did it over the course of half a season or so and dang near led an OKC team decimated by injuries to the playoffs in an uber-competitive Western Conference.

Don't say this on the PC board, you'll be told Russ didn't have the "impact" Lebron did. :roll:

RAPM says so.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
NaturalThunder
General Manager
Posts: 8,491
And1: 3,907
Joined: Jun 13, 2012
     

Re: Re: 

Post#217 » by NaturalThunder » Thu Jun 18, 2015 5:13 am

bondom34 wrote:
NaturalThunder wrote:
Hobes wrote:So there was discussion today on ESPN radio mentioning OKC trading Westbrook for the Knicks #4. I seriously can't believe this was even discussed...

:lol:

Presti wouldn't have even entertained the thought of trading Westbrook after his 15-5-5 49% TS rookie season, or his 16-8-5 49% TS second season if it could have netted him the #4 pick in the draft. Why in the world would he consider doing it after his 28-9-7 54% TS 2015 season? Russ essentially did what LeBron did in the playoffs, just with fewer points but a +7% TS advantage, but instead of doing it in a 6-game series, he did it over the course of half a season or so and dang near led an OKC team decimated by injuries to the playoffs in an uber-competitive Western Conference.

Don't say this on the PC board, you'll be told Russ didn't have the "impact" Lebron did. :roll:

RAPM says so.

I'm sure on the PC board, too. LeBron is pretty much untouchable on here. There's very, very little criticism of his game on either the GB or PC, and anytime you try and say any current NBA player had a similar impact or even a better impact than LeBron at any point in time you're blaspheming and know nothing about basketball.
Said in a thread about which point guards would make OKC better if they replaced Westbrook:
Coxy wrote:I think with a PG like George Hill, they'd be better than current.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Re: 

Post#218 » by bondom34 » Thu Jun 18, 2015 5:27 am

NaturalThunder wrote:
bondom34 wrote:
NaturalThunder wrote: :lol:

Presti wouldn't have even entertained the thought of trading Westbrook after his 15-5-5 49% TS rookie season, or his 16-8-5 49% TS second season if it could have netted him the #4 pick in the draft. Why in the world would he consider doing it after his 28-9-7 54% TS 2015 season? Russ essentially did what LeBron did in the playoffs, just with fewer points but a +7% TS advantage, but instead of doing it in a 6-game series, he did it over the course of half a season or so and dang near led an OKC team decimated by injuries to the playoffs in an uber-competitive Western Conference.

Don't say this on the PC board, you'll be told Russ didn't have the "impact" Lebron did. :roll:

RAPM says so.

I'm sure on the PC board, too. LeBron is pretty much untouchable on here. There's very, very little criticism of his game on either the GB or PC, and anytime you try and say any current NBA player had a similar impact or even a better impact than LeBron at any point in time you're blaspheming and know nothing about basketball.

Or Curry tbh. Its gotten to a point where I feel like the PC board at times has become a rank by RAPM forum, which is odd as I used to sort of fnd it useful, but never as a singular defining number that some seem to use it as. It can support an argument, not make it imo.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Balkman32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,825
And1: 808
Joined: Jul 19, 2007
 

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2015 

Post#219 » by Balkman32 » Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:39 pm

Bravenewworld wrote:Why wouldnt it be realistic to think we could sign a guy who will most likely sign for an MLE contract?


Yes. But, can only offer the Tax Payers mid-level which is 3 million. I think everyone will be throwing their 5 million mid-level exception around this off season.
Balkman32
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,825
And1: 808
Joined: Jul 19, 2007
 

Re: OKC Thunder Offseason 2015 

Post#220 » by Balkman32 » Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:53 pm

spearsy23 wrote:
bondom34 wrote:
spearsy23 wrote:Forgot about Novak, but I like that he has a clearly defined role. I think Singler is the better option as the backup 3 (we don't have a good offensive player on the bench so the more guys who have value offensively, the better), and we all know I have a hard-on for Robes. I just don't see Barnes as a need, but I also can't stand him in general, so it may be that talking.

I get the people hating him part, he's not likeable. I'm still hoping for Dunleavy somehow if they open a roster spot, and I'm maybe the only one who's as big a Robes fan as you (I may actually try to get an autograph).

Though I'm not sure Novak really has a "defined role".

Novak has a very clearly defined role, it's 'we're down by three with 5 seconds left, stand in the corner.' Outside of that he's perfectly happy riding the bench :lol:

I'd really like Dunleavy, probably more than Singler.

I really want a Robes jersey, if he's still starting this season I'm for sure getting one.


It will be interesting to see what Dunleavey will do this year. If we loose Singler I would assume the Thunder would offer him the FULL Tax Payers MLE.

Return to Oklahoma City Thunder


cron