Mason Plumlee?

[mikepacernation]

I've been reading some stuff talking about the pacers trading the 11th pick for mason plumlee? What do you guys think? I'm not a fan of doing that trade at all


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

[Scoot McGroot]

I've been reading some stuff talking about the pacers trading the 11th pick for mason plumlee? What do you guys think? I'm not a fan of doing that trade at all


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

I can't imagine that there were any reputable rumors of that. Mason Plumlee's value has plummeted enough that the 11 is much too high for him, even if Brooklyn sends back their 29.

[Wizop]

this question is posed in another thread. I think it'd take a lot more than Plumlee to get our pick. I might trade Mahinmi for him though if the dollars work and the checker says they do.

[8305]

What about pick 11 for Cody Zeller?

[Moooose]

Been thinking about this too. I don't know, if none of the guys we wanted at 11 wouldn't be available by the time we're on the clock, I'd do it for Plumlee and the 29th.

[Scoot McGroot]

What about pick 11 for Cody Zeller?

Cody's not being shopped, and right now I'd like to see what we could do with a guy on a 4 year rookie deal instead of trading for a guy in the last year or two of his before having to be resigned.

[basketballwacko2]

Mason Plumlee is not worth the #11 and or dropping down to 29. I might do Ian #43 for Plumlee.