BrotherDave wrote:He's not better than Mario.
Yup. No way in hell.
Moderators: yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop, BigSlam
BrotherDave wrote:He's not better than Mario.
BrotherDave wrote:He's not better than Mario.
Vanderbilt_Grad wrote:Mario's success or failure is going to depend a LOT on which team drafts him. I think that Booker isn't as good, but is more likely to have success regardless of situation.
DY_nasty wrote:Vanderbilt_Grad wrote:Mario's success or failure is going to depend a LOT on which team drafts him. I think that Booker isn't as good, but is more likely to have success regardless of situation.
It's arguable the Booker wouldn't even be a standout in the D-League because he likely won't have a staggering asst'd FG% like he did at Kentucky and for once he'd be put in a position where he's forced to create open looks for himself without 3 1st round talents setting screens for him and 30+ seconds to work.
People are CONSTANTLY trashing european and international players based on outdated stereotypes, biases, and general ignorance.
Vanderbilt_Grad wrote:DY_nasty wrote:Vanderbilt_Grad wrote:Mario's success or failure is going to depend a LOT on which team drafts him. I think that Booker isn't as good, but is more likely to have success regardless of situation.
It's arguable the Booker wouldn't even be a standout in the D-League because he likely won't have a staggering asst'd FG% like he did at Kentucky and for once he'd be put in a position where he's forced to create open looks for himself without 3 1st round talents setting screens for him and 30+ seconds to work.
People are CONSTANTLY trashing european and international players based on outdated stereotypes, biases, and general ignorance.
So I'm trashing Mario by saying that he's better than Booker? Really?
The issue with Mario isn't that he European, it's going to be his ego. It's a double edged sword that will be fine some places and problematic in others.

According to ESPN Stats & Info’s NBA Draft Projection Model, Booker is projected to have a statistical plus/minus of 0.47 in years 2 through 5 of his NBA career. Statistical plus/minus is an estimate of a player’s contribution to his team’s point differential per 100 possessions. An SPM of zero is considered league average (weighted for minutes), and replacement level players have an SPM of about -2.
The projection model calculated the likelihood of a player to fall into one of four categories: Superstar, Starter, Role Player and Bust. There are generally one superstar, 10 starters and 25 role players who come out of each draft class. The projections for Booker are as follows (percents don’t add to 100 because of rounding):
Superstar: 7 percent
Starter: 32 percent
Role Player: 39 percent
Bust: 21 percent
http://espn.go.com/blog/nba/post/_/id/4713/hornets-draft-projection-devin-booker


JDR720 wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/NetsDaily/status/611520442575228930[/tweet]

jdm3 wrote:JDR720 wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/NetsDaily/status/611520442575228930[/tweet]
I don't see how he gets them high enough to draft Booker. 29 and Plumlee just isn't enough to move up very far.

jdm3 wrote:JDR720 wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/NetsDaily/status/611520442575228930[/tweet]
I don't see how he gets them high enough to draft Booker. 29 and Plumlee just isn't enough to move up very far.
DY_nasty wrote:jdm3 wrote:JDR720 wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/NetsDaily/status/611520442575228930[/tweet]
I don't see how he gets them high enough to draft Booker. 29 and Plumlee just isn't enough to move up very far.
It doesn't. But if Charlotte and OKC both pass on Booker, which really isn't a stretch at all, then Booker could fall far enough that a Plumlee, trash, #29 deal may do the trick
BlackOutBuzz wrote:@stevekylerNBA
Was told Booker prime target at #9 by Hornets. https://t.co/J1jpIqnF3s