Bravenewworld wrote:spearsy23 wrote:Bravenewworld wrote:So why is it that when i mention this, you cant simply say "maybe i overvalued him", no, you gotta try to start an argument and as always you try to bring it back to Waiters, even though you know i think its utter basketball ignorance to judge where he is going in his development after 40 games. But you just gotta try to argue.
Dion Waiters has been in the league for 3 years. Dion Waiters has been the same player for three years.
The post you originally responded to was about Waiters. You're the one who wants to argue about him. The dude sucks. He can't shoot, can't pass, is an idiot, and plays average defense. Jeremy Lamb also sucks, maybe slightly less than Waiters, maybe the same amount, but definitely not more. The only difference is that Lamb doesn't keep getting excuses made and minutes handed.
And despite him showing slow growth, the base skill sets he is working with is far more valuable than Lamb and something we should work on before we dismiss him.
Again, ive said this a billion times but it seems not to seep into that thick skull.
You literally type things just to read your own posts, don't you? If you actually paid attention to anything anyone else said you'd know that I am completely against dumping Waiters. I actually had that discussion with Bondom in this freaking thread.
Waiters, for his age, has put up impressive numbers that most players his age do not.
If by 'numbers' you solely mean points, then yeah, you're right. Sorry we're not all savvy basketball fans that realize points are how you measure players.
The skill set he has is ideal for how OKC develops players and given his skill set and what weve seen him post in his past, its worth the development time to see what he becomes. And as we've already seen, he is capable of having great moments.

well this sure is a far cry from what you've been preaching all season.
Which is far more then we can say about Lamb. Who again, was in no way shape or form, better than Waiters or even close to Waiters.
I've asked this so many times, but what does Waiters do better than Lamb? You've never responded to this. You always disappear or clam up at this point. I've broken it down several times and Waitets is a better ball-handler and (by the eye test) defender. That's it. Lamb is a better shooter and rebounder, neither are good passers.
If he was consistent with his defense, id give him that, but he was horrible inconsistent with his defense.
RAPM has Lamb as a better defender. On/off for Dion has him as better while here but the same as Lamb while in Cleveland. Opponent PER greatly favors Lamb. I think calling them a push may actually be fair, Dion certainly isn't ahead by any large margin.
And what are you talking about Lamb does not get excuses made? Its all ive heard on these forums. WTF do you think you just did with the first round pick thing. Its an excuse for his crap play.
How did anything I type excuse his play? Excuses are what you've been making for Dion all year. "The Cavs offense was a mess, he'll do much better here." "Scoring 15 points on 14 shots would have people talking about how great KD is." "Well we've only seen him for 40 games." "At least he's consistent." "Those are flaws all young players have." "There has been too much inconsistency in the lineups for him to do well."
Those are all variations of things you've said in relation to Dion.
Bravenewworld wrote:spearsy23 wrote:Which is why he was a part of the trade for Brooke Lopez that Presti ultimately turned down?
I got some news for you.... Nets turned that trade down, Presti did not.
Why did they turn it down? Because they felt Lopez had higher value.
You're right, they did turn it down, but you're wrong about the reason. It's because they couldn't find a taker for Perk's contract. In fact they refused to include Charlotte because they preferred Lamb to Lance Stephenson.
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/sources--thunder-in-serious-discussions-to-acquire-brook-lopez-from-nets-170834007.html