Now that he knows his role... should we bring Stuckey back for the low?
Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
Re: Now that he knows his role... should we bring Stuckey back for the low?
-
ElectricMayhem
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,241
- And1: 11,452
- Joined: Jul 01, 2006
- Location: Kobe-Osaka
-
Re: Now that he knows his role... should we bring Stuckey back for the low?
Are you guys crazy? There's always room for a rich man's Harden.
Tom Gores' Securus faced a class action lawsuit in 2024. The company engaged in a "quid pro quo kickback scheme" with county jails in Michigan which banned in-person visits in order to maximize revenue from voice and video calls.
Re: Now that he knows his role... should we bring Stuckey back for the low?
-
313 Professor
- Starter
- Posts: 2,247
- And1: 963
- Joined: May 12, 2009
- Location: Southfield, MI
Re: Now that he knows his role... should we bring Stuckey back for the low?
Uncle Mxy wrote:If Rockin' Rodney's finally figured out a 3P shot, I doubt we can lowball him.
I always felt he could develop and hit open 3's at a respectable 35-37% clip but he shot it really well last year at 39%. I don't expect that to last, but if he's taking more open shots off of ball movement than shots off of the dribble and at the end of the shot clock I think he can stay in that range.
Now that he knows his role... should we bring Stuckey back for the low?
-
gusman
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,721
- And1: 373
- Joined: Jul 25, 2002
Now that he knows his role... should we bring Stuckey back for the low?
I hate Rodney Stuckey.