ImageImageImage

Suns Offseason Thread 3: Spurned for the Spurs

Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22

AtheJ415
Head Coach
Posts: 6,580
And1: 5,558
Joined: Jul 07, 2014

Re: Suns Offseason Thread 3: Spurned for the Spurs 

Post#21 » by AtheJ415 » Sat Jul 4, 2015 8:04 pm

letsgosuns wrote:David Lee averaged 18.9 pts and 10.0 rebounds in his three previous seasons with the Warriors before last season. He has never shot below 50% fg in his career. Take at a look at his career stats: http://espn.go.com/nba/player/stats/_/id/2772/david-lee Who else could the Suns possibly get at this point better than him unless they trade for a superstar. He is only signed for one year. It would not be a long term commitment. If you can get a guy that puts up nearly 20 and 10 every night when your current power forward averages 15 and 6, you do it. Chandler and Lee could dominant the boards. And Lee runs the floor. I say take the chance and see if you can make the playoffs. Sign Amare too. With a rotating frontcourt of Lee/Amare and Chandler/Len, you can play big or small.


Okay, but his value isn't that high because he's an awful defender who has an awful contract. His team has been trying to move him for the last few years to get out from under his contract. In that situation you shouldn't give up anyone.

Also, if we have those guys we don't need Amare. Amare is a bad basketball player now.
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

 

Post#22 » by WeekapaugGroove » Sat Jul 4, 2015 8:05 pm

I'm so confused why I keep seeing amares name brought up. Have you not watched him play the last couple years? He's completely done as a player, it's almost sad watching this version of amare. He really really really can't play anymore. Giving him ANY minutes would be a complete failure.
AtheJ415
Head Coach
Posts: 6,580
And1: 5,558
Joined: Jul 07, 2014

Re: Suns Offseason Thread 3: Spurned for the Spurs 

Post#23 » by AtheJ415 » Sat Jul 4, 2015 8:05 pm

jcsunsfan wrote:
AtheJ415 wrote:Since Wright hasn't signed a deal yet, can we keep his RFA rights and match him?


I think he is unrestricted



He is. Must've been confusing him with Knight. :noway:
User avatar
rsavaj
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,863
And1: 2,767
Joined: May 09, 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Re: Suns Offseason Thread 3: Spurned for the Spurs 

Post#24 » by rsavaj » Sat Jul 4, 2015 8:05 pm

letsgosuns wrote:David Lee averaged 18.9 pts and 10.0 rebounds in his three previous seasons with the Warriors before last season. He has never shot below 50% fg in his career. Take at a look at his career stats: http://espn.go.com/nba/player/stats/_/id/2772/david-lee Who else could the Suns possibly get at this point better than him unless they trade for a superstar. He is only signed for one year. It would not be a long term commitment. If you can get a guy that puts up nearly 20 and 10 every night when your current power forward averages 15 and 6, you do it. Chandler and Lee could dominant the boards. And Lee runs the floor. I say take the chance and see if you can make the playoffs. Sign Amare too. With a rotating frontcourt of Lee/Amare and Chandler/Len, you can play big or small.


But what would we trade for him? If we sign Chandler, that takes up 13 million of our ~20ish in cap space, meaning we'd have 7 million in free cap space. Lee makes 15.5 million, - 7 mill of our cap space = we still need to send out ~8.5 mill in salary.

I absolutely would not move Markieff for Lee. Next up would be Tucker + McNeal or Leuer, and I'm not sure I do that deal either.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,075
And1: 60,965
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Suns Offseason Thread 3: Spurned for the Spurs 

Post#25 » by bwgood77 » Sat Jul 4, 2015 8:06 pm

At least we can all become better at empathizing with all fairly hot chicks that continually get dumped for the really hot chick.
AtheJ415
Head Coach
Posts: 6,580
And1: 5,558
Joined: Jul 07, 2014

Re: 

Post#26 » by AtheJ415 » Sat Jul 4, 2015 8:06 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:I'm so confused why I keep seeing amares name brought up. Have you not watched him play the last couple years? He's completely done as a player, it's almost sad watching this version of amare. He really really really can't play anymore. Giving him ANY minutes would be a complete failure.


This. He can hit a mid range jumper. That's it. We'd be much better off signing Jordan Hill at that point, who can rebound too and could still improve at his age.
User avatar
rsavaj
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,863
And1: 2,767
Joined: May 09, 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Re: 

Post#27 » by rsavaj » Sat Jul 4, 2015 8:06 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:I'm so confused why I keep seeing amares name brought up. Have you not watched him play the last couple years? He's completely done as a player, it's almost sad watching this version of amare. He really really really can't play anymore. Giving him ANY minutes would be a complete failure.


He's not, though. He still produces when he gets his minutes. Can't play defense(never could), but he's turned into a dangerous scorer on the low-block. Can only play 15-20 mpg, but he plays hard and scores points in those 15-20 minutes.

I'm not suggesting we go out and spend big money on the guy, but if he wants to come home and is willing to play for cheap, we have a vacancy at the backup PF spot.

I don't care how bad he is; he's still better than Jon Leuer.
letsgosuns
Veteran
Posts: 2,885
And1: 2,167
Joined: Jan 28, 2014

Re: Suns Offseason Thread 3: Spurned for the Spurs 

Post#28 » by letsgosuns » Sat Jul 4, 2015 8:10 pm

What if the Suns can do a three team with the Warriors and another team where the Suns send out Markieff and get back Lee and draft picks and/or another young player. Is that sufficient? I mean the way some fans on here overvalue and talk about Markieff and his contract, you would think they would be able trade him and Tucker for Paul George or something.
AtheJ415
Head Coach
Posts: 6,580
And1: 5,558
Joined: Jul 07, 2014

Re: Suns Offseason Thread 3: Spurned for the Spurs 

Post#29 » by AtheJ415 » Sat Jul 4, 2015 8:12 pm

[quote="letsgosuns"]What if the Suns can do a three team with the Warriors and another team where the Suns send out Markieff and get back Lee and draft picks and/or another young player. Is that sufficient? I mean the way some fans on here overvalue and talk about Markieff and his contract, you would think they would be able trade him and Tucker for Paul George or something.[/quote

If we got Looney as well, yes, but that's not the problem with your original trades involving him.

Dumping him for nothing, or trading him for a player the other team has wanted to dump for literally years is a problem.
gaspar
Suns Forum Stat Stuffer
Posts: 6,761
And1: 5,479
Joined: Jun 21, 2009

Re: 

Post#30 » by gaspar » Sat Jul 4, 2015 8:13 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:I'm so confused why I keep seeing amares name brought up. Have you not watched him play the last couple years? He's completely done as a player, it's almost sad watching this version of amare. He really really really can't play anymore. Giving him ANY minutes would be a complete failure.

Well, he's probably the best available free agent power forward on the market right now. As a backup playing 15-20 mpg he wouldn't be bad (assuming he's willing to sign a 1-year contract).
letsgosuns
Veteran
Posts: 2,885
And1: 2,167
Joined: Jan 28, 2014

Re: Suns Offseason Thread 3: Spurned for the Spurs 

Post#31 » by letsgosuns » Sat Jul 4, 2015 8:16 pm

AtheJ415 wrote:
letsgosuns wrote:What if the Suns can do a three team with the Warriors and another team where the Suns send out Markieff and get back Lee and draft picks and/or another young player. Is that sufficient? I mean the way some fans on here overvalue and talk about Markieff and his contract, you would think they would be able trade him and Tucker for Paul George or something.[/quote

If we got Looney as well, yes, but that's not the problem with your original trades involving him.

Dumping him for nothing, or trading him for a player the other team has wanted to dump for literally years is a problem.


Yeah but I know that would never happen. I am just trying to state how much I want him gone. Realistically, I expect the Suns to get something decent in return for him. Also, David Lee's contract 'was' terrible. It is not terrible anymore. Now it is an expiring contract. So while he might have under performed in Golden State, that is in the past, and what remains is a pretty productive player with a one year deal.
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Re: Re: 

Post#32 » by WeekapaugGroove » Sat Jul 4, 2015 8:17 pm

rsavaj wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:I'm so confused why I keep seeing amares name brought up. Have you not watched him play the last couple years? He's completely done as a player, it's almost sad watching this version of amare. He really really really can't play anymore. Giving him ANY minutes would be a complete failure.


He's not, though. He still produces when he gets his minutes. Can't play defense(never could), but he's turned into a dangerous scorer on the low-block. Can only play 15-20 mpg, but he plays hard and scores points in those 15-20 minutes.

I'm not suggesting we go out and spend big money on the guy, but if he wants to come home and is willing to play for cheap, we have a vacancy at the backup PF spot.

I don't care how bad he is; he's still better than Jon Leuer.
I guess the way I see it keif will start and play about 33 mins a game. That leaves 15 minutes and I'd rather see those used for playing len with chandler for short stretches and going small with Warren and TJ together for short stretches.

It's true they need to add some bodies to fill out the roster but I'd rather they look at guys in their 20s rather than amare taking up that spot and potentially taking minutes from len and Warren.
User avatar
Nando88
Veteran
Posts: 2,568
And1: 256
Joined: Feb 06, 2009

Suns Offseason Thread 3: Spurned for the Spurs 

Post#33 » by Nando88 » Sat Jul 4, 2015 8:19 pm

Honestly with Tyson chandler we have to compete or at least try. With mcd's moves so far it seems tanking isn't an option. Id take a chance on David lee for a season. He has a lot to gain and prove. It's a contract year for him


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
AtheJ415
Head Coach
Posts: 6,580
And1: 5,558
Joined: Jul 07, 2014

Re: Suns Offseason Thread 3: Spurned for the Spurs 

Post#34 » by AtheJ415 » Sat Jul 4, 2015 8:22 pm

Nando88 wrote:Honestly with Tyson chandler we have to compete or at least try. With mcd's moves so far it seems tanking isn't an option. Id take a chance on David lee for a season. He has a lot to gain and prove. It's a contract year for him


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums



Even if we didn't sign Chandler tanking wouldn't have been an option. This team nearly made the playoffs the last 2 years due to its young talent. Young talent improves. We'd have had to move Bledsoe, Knight, and Len to really tank and that would just be :crazy: because you tank to get players like that.
User avatar
rsavaj
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,863
And1: 2,767
Joined: May 09, 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Re: Suns Offseason Thread 3: Spurned for the Spurs 

Post#35 » by rsavaj » Sat Jul 4, 2015 8:27 pm

Maybe McD goes after Nene?
User avatar
JTrain
Starter
Posts: 2,108
And1: 1,012
Joined: Feb 14, 2011
 

Re: Suns Offseason Thread 3: Spurned for the Spurs 

Post#36 » by JTrain » Sat Jul 4, 2015 8:39 pm

We would definitely be a tank candidate without Chandler. We would have one of the three worst starting SFs in the West, of the three worst starting PFs in the West and one of the five or so worst starting Cs (as much as I like Len). We won 35.7% of our games after the trades last season.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,075
And1: 60,965
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: Suns Offseason Thread 3: Spurned for the Spurs 

Post#37 » by bwgood77 » Sat Jul 4, 2015 8:43 pm

JTrain wrote:
letsgosuns wrote:I understand exactly what you are saying. Here is my bottom line with him. Forget all that off the court garbage, the immaturity, the arguing with refs. I just do not think he is that good. At best, and I mean truly at best, a backup power forward. The Suns are going to go nowhere with him in the 3-4 years anyway if he is the starter.

Then I factor in all the other stuff besides his actual game and I say to myself, why would I want this guy on the team any longer. They do not win with him anyway. He does nothing but cause problems and aggravation for the organization. If what he said about the fans was not a big deal, then why was Robert Sarver a guest on Gambo's show the day after it happened at exactly 2 p.m., trying to play down what he said. Because it was a huge deal what he said. How often does an owner of a basketball team take the initiative to call in themselves to a radio show unless something major has happened.

I have talked to quite a few people about this (not on this message board) and they all want him off the team. Someone I know actually said to me, when has the Suns organization ever had players like the Morris brothers in franchise history. These are not the kinds of players the Suns are known for. Ever. Maybe Michael Beasley's influence is still on people's minds and fans have lowered their standards on what kinds of players they want to watch but I have not. I want to watch players that actually go all out and do everything they are capable of to win. Perfect example is Matthew Dellavedova. That guy sucks and has virtually no game, but he tries harder than I have ever seen Markieff try in his career. Markieff obviously smokes him talent wise but heart wise there is no comparison. Hence why I say you will never win with Markieff on your roster.


Right. You're not treading any new ground here. And again, I agree with many of your observations. My point is, he must be treated as an asset and traded at the right time, when someone is willing to give us something valuable in return. We can't trade him for a box of cereal.


I think a huge contingent of the casual fanbase doesn't like or want to see the Morris twins. I know people who have been huge fans in the past that don't watch or care about the team, and if I bring them up they ALWAYS mention the twins.

I think most everyone knows this, that the popularity of the team is down in some part, maybe a big part, due to the twins. It was huge to get rid of the bigger problem of the two, and I'm all about guys getting second chances. I think Markieff is very good and is still getting better, but how much the fan base is into the team plays a large part and can really energize the team if everyone is behind the team. One of the best things about LMA would have been for the fanbase. Like I've mentioned before, I don't know if we would have contended with him as our best player, but the general feeling around the team and the fans would have changed immensely which would create more buzz and it could have a domino effect.

I mean, just look how crazy excited this forum became over the last few days.

But he does have a ton of basketball value, so we can't and shouldn't just ship him off for nothing. It might be best for him and for the team if he gets a fresh start somewhere, but unless he nets us a great return (a better player or mid first round pick at the minimum), you have to give him a chance to prove his doubters wrong....I do have a feeling some contingent of the fanbase will never be a fan of his though, so it is a tough situation.
AtheJ415
Head Coach
Posts: 6,580
And1: 5,558
Joined: Jul 07, 2014

Re: Suns Offseason Thread 3: Spurned for the Spurs 

Post#38 » by AtheJ415 » Sat Jul 4, 2015 8:44 pm

JTrain wrote:We would definitely be a tank candidate without Chandler. We would have one of the three worst starting SFs in the West, of the three worst starting PFs in the West and one of the five or so worst starting Cs (as much as I like Len). We won 35.7% of our games after the trades last season.


Who do you think was our starting SF and PF last year, when we nearly made the playoffs? And Kieff now is every bit as good as Frye 2 years ago.

And Knight was injured for much of it, and losing games after a roster shakeup isn't unusual.
User avatar
JTrain
Starter
Posts: 2,108
And1: 1,012
Joined: Feb 14, 2011
 

Re: Suns Offseason Thread 3: Spurned for the Spurs 

Post#39 » by JTrain » Sat Jul 4, 2015 8:50 pm

AtheJ415 wrote:
JTrain wrote:We would definitely be a tank candidate without Chandler. We would have one of the three worst starting SFs in the West, of the three worst starting PFs in the West and one of the five or so worst starting Cs (as much as I like Len). We won 35.7% of our games after the trades last season.


Who do you think was our starting SF and PF last year, when we nearly made the playoffs? And Kieff now is every bit as good as Frye 2 years ago.

And Knight was injured for much of it, and losing games after a roster shakeup isn't unusual.


So you think we would be good without Chandler? Like 40 wins?
AtheJ415
Head Coach
Posts: 6,580
And1: 5,558
Joined: Jul 07, 2014

Re: Suns Offseason Thread 3: Spurned for the Spurs 

Post#40 » by AtheJ415 » Sat Jul 4, 2015 8:52 pm

JTrain wrote:
AtheJ415 wrote:
JTrain wrote:We would definitely be a tank candidate without Chandler. We would have one of the three worst starting SFs in the West, of the three worst starting PFs in the West and one of the five or so worst starting Cs (as much as I like Len). We won 35.7% of our games after the trades last season.


Who do you think was our starting SF and PF last year, when we nearly made the playoffs? And Kieff now is every bit as good as Frye 2 years ago.

And Knight was injured for much of it, and losing games after a roster shakeup isn't unusual.


So you think we would be good without Chandler? Like 40 wins?


Yup. You think we'd fall off a cliff because we lost Gerald Green and Brandan Wright?

Return to Phoenix Suns