ISaberestar wrote:bwgood77 wrote:Saberestar wrote:Phoenix Suns: Drawing Up Potential Markieff Morris Trades
http://valleyofthesuns.com/2015/08/08/phoenix-suns-drawing-potential-markieff-morris-trades/
I don't think the Suns would want Gibson. He's a nice player, but he has no range. I can't see why the Pelicans would trade Ryan Anderson, especially with Gentry there, who likes to spread the floor. Maybe if it was a three way trade and they got Frye with Orlando getting Kieff, but that's still a downgrade for NO (only reason to do it is because they could lose Anderson next summer). Houston wouldn't want Morris...they want 3 pt shooters only.
The rest of the deals could happen. Looking at Marvin Williams #s, they are not bad. He's 29, but he could maybe provide leadership. It is low value, but it is probably going to be something like him or Frye. That McRoberts/Chalmers deal actually isn't bad either. McRoberts can stretch the floor. Landry's a hard worker but he's not a fit.
So I think only three of those deals are feasible, and they are all low value. If we could get Marvin, Frye, or McRoberts/Chalmers AND a first rounder, then it might be enough to pull the trigger.
I am not a Markieff's fan, but even to me those three more possible trades are really low offers.
Marvin Williams can be out of the league or playing for the minimun in 2016, I am not joking. He was terrible last year on both ends of the floor.
I like McRoberts, but he was out with a big injury last year so we don't even know if he is really healthy, he is a high risk player. BTW, we don't need Chalmers at all.
Frye played really bad for Orlando last year, and we don't have Dragic here anymore. With Chandler and Price we have veterans and he is clearly on the downside of his career so I wouldn't trade for him if Orlando doesn't attached to him an asset of great value .
know they are low value but I can't seem to think of a player that fits our team AND has equal value which is why I said a first would need to be included.