With Jordy Out, What Do We Do at WR?
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
With Jordy Out, What Do We Do at WR?
- FAH1223
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,287
- And1: 7,382
- Joined: Nov 01, 2005
- Location: Laurel, MD
-
With Jordy Out, What Do We Do at WR?
[tweet]https://twitter.com/diannaespn/status/635814004552802305[/tweet]

Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
- PkrsBcksGphsMqt
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,827
- And1: 1,417
- Joined: Oct 27, 2005
- Location: Madison
-
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
Just posted that in the other thread. I think it's a decent move. If the younger guys blow up, then you can just cut him. Otherwise, it doesn't hurt having a crafty vet as an option behind Cobb and Adams.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,762
- And1: 6,963
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
I'd add him if he's interested. Still had 780 yards and 12.2 yards per reception last year.
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
- Ron Swanson
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,641
- And1: 29,466
- Joined: May 15, 2013
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
I'd be surprised if it happened. TT doesn't usually like bringing in veteran WRs, but I'd be all for it if he's not convinced either Janis or White are NFL-ready.
Problem is Wayne doesn't really have the speed to play outside anymore. Would that mean moving him to the slot and playing Cobb split out more?
Problem is Wayne doesn't really have the speed to play outside anymore. Would that mean moving him to the slot and playing Cobb split out more?
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
- Kerb Hohl
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,588
- And1: 4,450
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
- Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
This is just an eye test, but Myles White is useless. I'm not somebody that gets stoked over veteran names, but I'd prefer anybody over Myles White (if Janis is good enough for 5, then fine).
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,762
- And1: 6,963
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
-
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
Janis is making the team without any shred of doubt. I hope they add a veteran WR and then keep Cobb/Adams/Montgomery/Janis. White is terrible.
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
- crkone
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,150
- And1: 9,761
- Joined: Aug 16, 2006
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
Kerb Hohl wrote:This is just an eye test, but Myles White is useless. I'm not somebody that gets stoked over veteran names, but I'd prefer anybody over Myles White (if Janis is good enough for 5, then fine).
White has been getting pretty good separation and has made some difficult catches in the games. He's also been raved about in the practices and he runs a 4.42. His big problem was he could (and can still?) be tackled with ease by a slight breeze. One problem with getting a FA WR is they need to learn a difficult playbook in a short amount of time.
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
- MikeIsGood
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,765
- And1: 11,653
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
- Location: Vamos Rafa
-
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
I would absolutely be interested in Wayne. Without a doubt.
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,406
- And1: 343
- Joined: Dec 23, 2004
- Location: Rockford, IL
-
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
I guess I'm fine with it. I don't think Wayne really can play much anymore, but he's definitely an upgrade over somebody like Myles White.
I'd rather root for the Giants to cut James Jones, but whatever.
I'd rather root for the Giants to cut James Jones, but whatever.
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
- M-C-G
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,525
- And1: 9,849
- Joined: Jan 13, 2013
-
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
James Jones will likely be cut by the Giants and makes a lot of sense here.
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,546
- And1: 8,292
- Joined: Jun 29, 2005
-
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
M-C-G wrote:James Jones will likely be cut by the Giants and makes a lot of sense here.
James Jones signed Thursday and had a great game on Saturday. Doubt they cut him.
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
- MickeyDavis
- Global Mod
- Posts: 103,119
- And1: 55,662
- Joined: May 02, 2002
- Location: The Craps Table
-
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
I don't like with Janis or White so I'm fine with this I guess. Maybe there will be a surprise WR cut on 9/1 or later
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
- PkrsBcksGphsMqt
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,827
- And1: 1,417
- Joined: Oct 27, 2005
- Location: Madison
-
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
James Jones, Reggie Wayne, misc. free agent, Myles White, in that order.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
- humanrefutation
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 32,909
- And1: 16,588
- Joined: Jun 05, 2006
-
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
Everything I've read said James Jones is pretty much locked in as the #4 WR with the NYG. Doubt we get a chance at him.
I've wanted us to bring in Wayne for a while as a solid security blanket. I'd love him here. Yeah, he's not a #1 anymore, but he can still make a big catch here and there and is a veteran with Super Bowl experience.
I've wanted us to bring in Wayne for a while as a solid security blanket. I'd love him here. Yeah, he's not a #1 anymore, but he can still make a big catch here and there and is a veteran with Super Bowl experience.
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
- Kerb Hohl
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,588
- And1: 4,450
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
- Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
humanrefutation wrote:Everything I've read said James Jones is pretty much locked in as the #4 WR with the NYG. Doubt we get a chance at him.
I've wanted us to bring in Wayne for a while as a solid security blanket. I'd love him here. Yeah, he's not a #1 anymore, but he can still make a big catch here and there and is a veteran with Super Bowl experience.
What is Super Bowl experience really? I agree with your other points, and I guess being a good veteran can be a good influence in the training rooms, etc. but does a guy take a different mindset into an NFL football game because he happened to play in the SB?
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
- crkone
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,150
- And1: 9,761
- Joined: Aug 16, 2006
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
[tweet]https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/635861579196575745[/tweet]
Wayne to the Pats
Wayne to the Pats
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
- crkone
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,150
- And1: 9,761
- Joined: Aug 16, 2006
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
Wayne could also come in and flop like a Jeff Saturday.
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
- PkrsBcksGphsMqt
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,827
- And1: 1,417
- Joined: Oct 27, 2005
- Location: Madison
-
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
Patriots probably signed him just to keep him away from us.
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Calvin Johnson is horrible and not a top WR.
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,948
- And1: 5,002
- Joined: May 06, 2014
-
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
If by some luck and craziness the Giants cut Jones then sure. Pick him up. But I don't really see the need to bring in Wayne. He's best suited in the slot nowadays so in 3 WR sets we're moving Cobb to the outside. With that being the case I'd rather roll with Montgomery in the slot instead and get him some game experience while also having a guy who at least runs the risk of making a few guys miss for a big play.
You gotta trust the young guys to step up. Next man up. Even the it's a Pro Bowler in Jordy it's still only one guy. We were going to lose somebody importent at some point this season. It's the way the NFL works. You adjust and move on. More Lacy. More R. Rodgers. More Cobb. More Adams. Along with a pretty damn good Oline. And of course there's the little matter of having the reigning MVP. Yes this offense can weather losing Nelson and still be one of the top units around.
I shudder to think of the ideas that'll get tossed around for who we should pick up if Shields goes down if this is how people are reacting to losing a single player, (yes one of the top guys but still), at a position where we also have another pro bowl caliber guy in Cobb at and another ascending player in Adams.
Once again. This is the NFL. These types of injuries happen to EVERY single team in the league.
You gotta trust the young guys to step up. Next man up. Even the it's a Pro Bowler in Jordy it's still only one guy. We were going to lose somebody importent at some point this season. It's the way the NFL works. You adjust and move on. More Lacy. More R. Rodgers. More Cobb. More Adams. Along with a pretty damn good Oline. And of course there's the little matter of having the reigning MVP. Yes this offense can weather losing Nelson and still be one of the top units around.
I shudder to think of the ideas that'll get tossed around for who we should pick up if Shields goes down if this is how people are reacting to losing a single player, (yes one of the top guys but still), at a position where we also have another pro bowl caliber guy in Cobb at and another ascending player in Adams.
Once again. This is the NFL. These types of injuries happen to EVERY single team in the league.
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
- humanrefutation
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 32,909
- And1: 16,588
- Joined: Jun 05, 2006
-
Re: Packers interested in Reggie Wayne
Kerb Hohl wrote:humanrefutation wrote:Everything I've read said James Jones is pretty much locked in as the #4 WR with the NYG. Doubt we get a chance at him.
I've wanted us to bring in Wayne for a while as a solid security blanket. I'd love him here. Yeah, he's not a #1 anymore, but he can still make a big catch here and there and is a veteran with Super Bowl experience.
What is Super Bowl experience really? I agree with your other points, and I guess being a good veteran can be a good influence in the training rooms, etc. but does a guy take a different mindset into an NFL football game because he happened to play in the SB?
Someone who has gone through the rigors of an NFL season and had managed to reach the pinnacle of his sport can be an inspiration to his teammates and can help provide a veteran's confidence and experience in managing the journey to the top. That's part of being a leader - making it to the top and showing the young guys (particularly the very young receiving corp) what it takes to get to there.
Even if you don't think that's true, I don't understand the point in nitpicking. You seem to enjoy doing that, for some reason.