BBALLER4FR wrote:Moose wrote:BBALLER4FR wrote:
Derrick Rose is accused of the very thing Bill Cosby is and yet we have people immediately coming to his defense where Cosby was never given the benefit of the doubt. When you can admit you intentionally glossed over that fact to support adolescent group think while injecting smarmy nonsense then I will "admit" that I am cool with rape.
What in the hell are you talking about?DrCoach wrote:If they were dating, it can't be rape, right?kej718 wrote:They about to ruin this guys career for something his accuser did not press charges for when it happened?![]()
She dated him 2-3 years and did all of that stuff?![]()
Even if he didn't do it this will stay with him for the rest of his career and all of those endorsements will be gone too. That being said if the Bulls were some how able to release him, I'm just saying we do have cap space![]()
![]()
Could anyone actually be this stupid? I think they have to check their phone records to see if anything was mentioned by either person around the time it was alleged to happen.Vash wrote:It shows, when you have money be careful. She's lying, straight off the bat. This is what these hoes...do. You must look at ROse's character. So many things are considered rape that shouldn't. I read stories about feminists trying to pass laws about, if a man lies about name, again, income, job, living life...ect or you have regrets about sleeping with a man, you can claim it is rape.
Rape laws change all the time, so maybe 10 years from now, looking at a woman, and thinking of having sex will be rape.
Anyhow, be careful men, keep it in your pants if you even think, B!tch maybe craaaazZY! All it takes is some saved sperm or a false accusation and you will be in jail, no proof.Iron Mantis wrote:this convoluted story is painting this man as beyond thirsty but....really just sounds like a concocted extortion attempt.
This isn't the part I was referring to.
People defended (or simply ignored it) Cosby for years. These allegations were a thing back then. They were brought up again by a comic and ignited a fire.
Even before all the other women came out, people didn't necessarily believe the first woman that did.
People are always going to be skeptical, especially men. Not to mention when it involves a person of wealth and the accuser doesn't take the proper action. In this case, she dated this man for a significant amount of time and waited two years to come forth with a civil suit. I think people here have the right to be skeptic. But crazy, unthinkable things happen, so we must now wait.
We will see what evidence follows. The story is obviously troubling and rather shocking.






























