DuckIII wrote:Obviously I do not. Hence them being private and confidential. But its hardly a secret it happens. Indeed, in Tiger Woods' case - in which he was never even accused by anyone of anything but having consensual affairs - it is known that he settled with a number of women who threatened to come forward. We just don't know who, how many, or in what amounts. But denying that this happens seems silly.
Of course it happens. It happens with "regular" people as well, but to the best of my knowledge, it's extremely rare. Do you know otherwise?
DuckIII wrote:You asked who else, and I have you names off the top of my head. But yes, obviously the percentage of professional athletes who formally and publicly have rape allegations leveled against them is going to be low. I'm not sure what your point is.
My point very simple - unlike some have claimed here, rape accusations are
EXTREMELY rare. Maybe 1/1000 NBA players gets accused of rape. I have yet to hear of an NBA player falsely accused of rape. Unfortunately, Derrick Rose is part of that statistic.
DuckIII wrote:I've tried to avoid getting into it with you about Kobe, but you need to stop saying he admitted the sex wasn't consensual. He did no such thing. His public statement was very carefully crafted to avoid that.
Kobe's statement was very carefully worded. Without getting in the nuances of the statement (and the case), I think we can both agree that Kobe was not "falsely accused".
DuckIII wrote:Limiting it to NBA players is disingenuous. The notion is that wealthy, successful and famous people are targets for he said she said accusations. They are. Why debate it?
I'm limiting it to NBA players since I'm more familiar with the NBA than I am with any other sport and/or the general celebrity population. I can't see what's disingenuous about it. Why are NBA players a non-representative sample?
Non-successful people are targets of the same accusations. Do you have any evidence to suggest rich/famous people get accused of rape more often than poor people? In my (non-informed) opinion, it's the other way around.
DuckIII wrote:That said, none of what I'm saying here should be interpreted as taking a position that Rose is being falsely accused. I have no idea if he did it or not. And I've always considered his image to be a fabrication even when he still had a good image. Maybe he did it, maybe he didn't. But whether he did or didn't has no bearing on the obvious truth that famous, wealthy people are targets for "blackmail" of this variety.
I'm not taking any position other than to say rape accusations are extremely rare, and false rape accusations are nearly non-existent.
As for your claim that famous/wealthy people are targets of false rape accusations, I have never seen any evidence to support that claim. Not empirical evidence and not even anecdotal evidence. How many cases can you remember of a rich/wealthy person being falsely accused of rape? I can't remember even one.