Nick Moody signing with Seahawks

Pattersonca65 · Post #1 » by **Pattersonca65** » Fri Sep 11, 2015 6:48 pm

LOL. I wonder if the Seahawks lead the NFL in signing our castoffs?

Bald Bull · Post #2 » by **Bald Bull** » Fri Sep 11, 2015 6:49 pm

It's been working for them, I wish we'd stoop to their levels.

Pattersonca65 · Post #3 » by **Pattersonca65** » Fri Sep 11, 2015 6:59 pm

Bald Bull wrote:It's been working for them, I wish we'd stoop to their levels.

That can be debated. I think the majority of them have done little. Lockette has been ok. Maybe Demarcus Dobbs. Someone posted the Seahawks are taking hot garbage out of our dumpster fire.

Post #4 » by **CalamityX12** » Fri Sep 11, 2015 7:09 pm

Maybe Cam Chancellor will be available for us?

its not like we don't want to be redundant with safeties.....

Bald Bull · Post #5 » by **Bald Bull** » Fri Sep 11, 2015 7:15 pm

Pattersonca65 wrote:
Bald Bull wrote:It's been working for them, I wish we'd stoop to their levels.

That can be debated. I think the majority of them have done little. Lockette has been ok. Maybe Demarcus Dobbs. Someone posted the Seahawks are taking hot garbage out of our dumpster fire.

I'm not talking about their ability as players, i think a part of the reason why Seahawks pick them up is to pick apart their brains. it's like mercenary spy work.

Tomikcon1971 · Post #6 » by **Tomikcon1971** » Fri Sep 11, 2015 8:18 pm

Bald Bull wrote:
Pattersonca65 wrote:
Bald Bull wrote:It's been working for them, I wish we'd stoop to their levels.

That can be debated. I think the majority of them have done little. Lockette has been ok. Maybe Demarcus Dobbs. Someone posted the Seahawks are taking hot garbage out of our dumpster fire.

I'm not talking about their ability as players, i think a part of the reason why Seahawks pick them up is to pick apart their brains. it's like mercenary spy work.

At this point we aren't their biggest threat......it has to be talent rather than spying. We are picked by most to go to dead last in NFC West maybe win three games.

Jikkle · Post #7 » by **Jikkle** » Fri Sep 11, 2015 9:42 pm

Bald Bull wrote:
Pattersonca65 wrote:
Bald Bull wrote:It's been working for them, I wish we'd stoop to their levels.

That can be debated. I think the majority of them have done little. Lockette has been ok. Maybe Demarcus Dobbs. Someone posted the Seahawks are taking hot garbage out of our dumpster fire.

I'm not talking about their ability as players, i think a part of the reason why Seahawks pick them up is to pick apart their brains. it's like mercenary spy work.

Moody has talent and he has more use to the Seahawks as depth than he did for the 9ers.

Moody simply was terrible in coverage and Skov while terrible at coverage got the edge because his ceiling appears higher and he was a slightly better run stopper.

Either one was going to be put in coverage as least as possible as it'll likely be Jaquiski Tartt who'll jump in as a coverage guy in passing situations

CrimsonCrew · Post #8 » by **CrimsonCrew** » Fri Sep 11, 2015 10:40 pm

I'll be interested to see if they get anything out of Moody. He's got great athleticism, but he lacks instincts for the position. Skov and Borland, despite being far less athletic than Moody, were both better players because they had great instincts and vision. He could do better in a 4-3 scheme, though. He could theoretically play and of the three positions in that front. Playing inside in a 3-4 requires better vision to sift through trash, etc. The 4-3 tends to free up LBs to play a bit more freely, which might suit Moody.