Just what is Kroenke promising NFL regarding Nuggets/Avs

[DoctaJ]

Also you must not have ever owned a company, all companies have input on their budget from partners, large shareholders, or the board of directors in the company, that is just the way it works

Wow!!

That's pretty funny. I keep getting banned here for being too what......nasty in my replies? But apparently if you are just incredibly condescending it is perfectly fine.

So is it pretty common that posters on this board are "company" owners, which, of course, has nothing whatsoever to do with what specific rules or bylaws of a professional sports league are?

You may or may not be correct in your explanation of what's okay in the NFL in terms of being a minority owner.

What IS certain is the pompous sanctimony of your comment above.

Since you're the moderator, I imagine this post is grounds for being banned.

To be fair, you were the first to be 'incredibly condescending'.. His 'incredibly condescending' comment was just what you said to him. His comment about you not having owned a company is just an observation. Why would you be offended by that? Get over it.

You just don't seem to be understanding (or wanting to understand) the answer you're looking for - or you don't really understand what you want to ask and therefore aren't accepting his answer. Rebel's made it pretty clear.

[JerrySloan]

To be fair, you were the first to be 'incredibly condescending'.. His 'incredibly condescending' comment was just what you said to him. His comment about you not having owned a company is just an observation. Why would you be offended by that? Get over it.

You just don't seem to be understanding (or wanting to understand) the answer you're looking for - or you don't really understand what you want to ask and therefore aren't accepting his answer. Rebel's made it pretty clear.

What?

What did I say that was personally "condescending" to REBEL?

As for his "haven't owned a company" comment being "just an observation" rather than condescension, you just proved your bias since you clearly implied that he DID condescend but that I did it first.

[The Rebel]

To be fair, you were the first to be 'incredibly condescending'.. His 'incredibly condescending' comment was just what you said to him. His comment about you not having owned a company is just an observation. Why would you be offended by that? Get over it.

You just don't seem to be understanding (or wanting to understand) the answer you're looking for - or you don't really understand what you want to ask and therefore aren't accepting his answer. Rebel's made it pretty clear.

What?

What did I say that was personally "condescending" to REBEL?

As for his "haven't owned a company" comment being "just an observation" rather than condescension, you just proved your bias since you clearly implied that he DID condescend but that I did it first.

Saying you haven't owned a business is not condescending, it is an observation.

Saying if you do not understand something then god bless you is condescending, but being that you used that in the post I replied to, I would think you would be awful careful about complaining about it being used on you. Or are you the only one allowed to treat other posters like crap when they do not give you the answer you want to hear?

The fact of the matter is I have not had you suspended or banned, that happened on other team's boards, but I have been very lenient towards you. That god bless you line was something I put in there to make you take a step back and realize how it felt coming back at you. However since you want play the victim, as many internet bullies do when called on their ****, consider this a warning if you keep attacking other posters, you will be banned as from what I understand you have already had your 2 suspensions.