REDDzone wrote:One of the worst part about bellator is the terrible, let me bang bro, just bleed crowds. Fights with like 10 knockdowns, doesn't matter, still booing.
.
San Jose, yeah? Never been but infamous as the land of dudebros.
Moderator: lilfishi22
REDDzone wrote:One of the worst part about bellator is the terrible, let me bang bro, just bleed crowds. Fights with like 10 knockdowns, doesn't matter, still booing.
.
Bernman wrote:REDDzone wrote:The kickboxing portions were meh to me and dragged. It would have been better if they had actual good glory fighters in the ring imo, I mean they only had one legit glory fight right?
I wouldn't know them from Jo Blo (but I thought the HW fight was for the title). Even with the best, I probably would have fast-forwarded if there wasn't a quick ko. I have a short-attention span for non MMA combat sports. In my brain I just can't accept you're not allowed to take a fight to the ground. Just like in my brain I can't accept that a jj practitioner or wrestler can't strike, or a boxer can't kick or do just about anything else besides punch in one direction with big puffy gloves on. It seems so arbitrary and incomplete after watching MMA. I used to be able to enjoy boxing and occasionally kickboxing, but MMA really killed those sports for me. BJJ and wrestling are fun to do, but not to watch, IMO.
REDDzone wrote:100% rooting for Tito here. Just because I'm the type of dude who likes to watch the world burn.
cowboyronnie wrote::roll: Or that an MMA fighter can't eye-gouge or break fingers or headbutt or stomp your head after you go out.
watching snuff films killed MMA for me.
Bernman wrote:cowboyronnie wrote::roll: Or that an MMA fighter can't eye-gouge or break fingers or headbutt or stomp your head after you go out.
watching snuff films killed MMA for me.
Allowing wrestling, subs, gnp, kicking, and knees between consenting parties isn't in any way analagous to murder and rape here. The former are reasonable inclusions in a sport fight to answer the question who is better. I don't see how purely punching people (and not even with backhands) with puffy gloves goes very far in determining that. Watch and be entertained by what you want, and you shouldn't take it personal that I don't, but it doesn't do anything for me anymore once I found the one sport that I need to satisfy my curiosity. That's the max I'll watch, if that even continues in the future. Like I shared I had my crisis of conscience with even one combat sport. The irony here is I'm not getting off on blood lust, like a person who watched all combat sports could be. I have the opposite mentality of a person with blood lust. They're watching everything where people get destroyed. I just like sports, and MMA is the ultimate one in the fight realm, which doesn't exceed the bounds of unreasonableness. We suspect it ends up ruining many a life in the long run, but we already know that about boxing and kickboxing.
cowboyronnie wrote:Dividing an athlete's ability to master any discipline by 3-5.
Liam McGeary, for example, has terrible kickboxing. And has been practicing the "sport" for only a few years. The fact he could shoot a half-assed takedown on prime Mike Tyson and beat him an MMA fight, makes him no more "ultimate" a sportsman. Nor MMA more ultimate a sport.
McGeary is world-class at nothing. And, yet, world-class at MMA. Says everything. Being a brown belt at three things makes you a striped-black in MMA. How ridiculous is that? McGeary has 6 years experience, for Christ's sake.
A collegiate steeplechaser could beat Usain Bolt at the steeplechase. Mediocre, undeveloped athletes.
Your comment about attention-span is the real source of MMA's popularity.
cowboyronnie wrote:REDDzone wrote:100% rooting for Tito here. Just because I'm the type of dude who likes to watch the world burn.
Contrarian assh0le
LOL, Tito's deference to McGeary was all about Tito. The subtext to everythign he said was him being great.
He's such a prick.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
cowboyronnie wrote:I wonder about that Davis punch, yeah? He's never KOd anyone. I think it's sort of that he throws super disciplined, straight punches usually but happened to have to reach for that one, and therefore whip it from the hip. I think it's sort of a combination of that and Carmont being a 170er (yeah?).
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
cowboyronnie wrote:Tito has 18 wins, 12 losses. Subtract those back-to-back Ken wins as WWE-caliber matchmaking and the Schlemenko win. I'm not good at math but that's getting him to a mediocre record.
Let's also subtract every win achieved while Mercury is in retrograde or during months that started on a weekend. Just cos, wtf. Without math, I'd bet he's _.500. Phil Baroni with better management.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
Return to Boxing & Mixed Martial Arts