Woody Allen wrote:Well, it could very strategically give you the edge in some mathcups against those small ball teams. Think about it.
Math Cups lol! autocorrect FTW!
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Moderators: floppymoose, Curtis Lemansky, sly
Woody Allen wrote:Well, it could very strategically give you the edge in some mathcups against those small ball teams. Think about it.
floppymoose wrote:Looking to trade a guard for a smallball-compatible PF/C.
I'm thinking one of my scrubbier guards (Grant/Mills/Marshall/Belinelli/Cunningham) for one of your scrubbier PF/C's, but I will listen to other ideas.


Woody Allen wrote:Well, it could very strategically give you the edge in some mathcups against those small ball teams. Think about it.
floppymoose wrote:Woody Allen wrote:Well, it could very strategically give you the edge in some mathcups against those small ball teams. Think about it.
ok, but the .304 ft% is also not a fit. He's not a smallball C.


sabonis wrote:Holy ****, I think Horford added 3pt shot to his arsenal. I was sorta expecting this, but was not banking on it.



floppymoose wrote:ok, team is done. at least for now.
fg%: average
ft%: elite
3pts: elite
pts: below average
rbd: bad
ast: good
stl: elite
blk: tank
to: average
the idea is to win my elite cats against pretty much everyone, and to win fg% and to against other smallball teams (since many will be below avg at these). i will lose fg%/rbd/blk to big teams. Hope to pull out either pts or to's against them but i think i'll need some breakouts from my bottom 6 players for that to happen.
3Si wrote:Hollis Thompson

writersblock wrote:Gokce sent me his pick, but my guess is I won't be up to make it for him, can anyone take it for me?
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

writersblock wrote:floppymoose wrote:ok, team is done. at least for now.
fg%: average
ft%: elite
3pts: elite
pts: below average
rbd: bad
ast: good
stl: elite
blk: tank
to: average
the idea is to win my elite cats against pretty much everyone, and to win fg% and to against other smallball teams (since many will be below avg at these). i will lose fg%/rbd/blk to big teams. Hope to pull out either pts or to's against them but i think i'll need some breakouts from my bottom 6 players for that to happen.
Looks like our teams may be built pretty similarly. Will be interesting to see which of our teams comes out on top
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
hamncheese wrote:One thing I will never do is quote someone and place it in my signature to make them look bad.
hamncheese wrote:One thing I will never do is quote someone and place it in my signature to make them look bad.
hamncheese wrote:Cursory ranking of the 6 teams with 14 players:
1a. floppy - nice small ball team, though 4 of the 6 completed teams have good strength at PG, it's hard to rank them; floppy and sabonis are neck and neck in my opinion
1b. sabonis - should be an interesting h2h match up with floppy as they have about same type of build; sabonis has the edge over floppy's weaknesses, but floppy has edge in some the strengths, if he stays healthy, Rubio will anchor and carry the assists and steals.
3. wb - the third small ball team out of the 6. As usual, he's banking on some unknown players to breakout. I think that strategy only pays off 20% of the time or less. The king of the waiver wire.
4a. theMan - may be the most inefficient of 6 teams; see high TOs, lowest ft%, fg% average; I don't like a team with LMA and DH12 together, as they don't fit well; Rondo is a wildcard
4b Curt - new guy has a balance of players and is anchored by Lebron, who isn't likely a top 3 fantasy player, is still a great player to build around.
6. alciG - may be the most balanced of the 6 teams, but balance doesn't always cut it in h2h
Return to Fantasy Basketball Leagues