Bucks
Cavs x 2 (53 wins last year...Finals runner up...2nd best player in the World
)Hornets
Hawks (won 60 games last year)
Bucks and Hornets both playoff teams.
Why are people beside themselves? Maybe we just aren't that good?
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23
)
StephNYKurry wrote:Spurs (55 Wins last year)
Bucks
Cavs x 2 (53 wins last year...Finals runner up...2nd best player in the World)
Hornets
Hawks (won 60 games last year)
Bucks and Hornets both playoff teams.
Why are people beside themselves? Maybe we just aren't that good?
IAmTheBest wrote:StephNYKurry wrote:Spurs (55 Wins last year)
Bucks
Cavs x 2 (53 wins last year...Finals runner up...2nd best player in the World)
Hornets
Hawks (won 60 games last year)
Bucks and Hornets both playoff teams.
Why are people beside themselves? Maybe we just aren't that good?
instead of posting meaningless records, you have to actually watch and analyze games.
IAmTheBest wrote:StephNYKurry wrote:Spurs (55 Wins last year)
Bucks
Cavs x 2 (53 wins last year...Finals runner up...2nd best player in the World)
Hornets
Hawks (won 60 games last year)
Bucks and Hornets both playoff teams.
Why are people beside themselves? Maybe we just aren't that good?
Everything you posted is irrelevant
We actually notched wins against cleveland and san antonio last season - our worst season in franchise history. does that mean anything
instead of posting meaningless records, you have to actually watch and analyze games.
we choked away easily winnable games mainly because of fisher's incompetence. that is the fact of the matter and everything else is irrelevant. Once is an accident. Twice is coincidence. Three times is a pattern. unfortnately, we are up to the "three times" part and this pattern is dangerous for the team and its future

AmazingJason wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:MaseInYourFace wrote:Just playing dev advocate, why can't we afford it? Is this team in title contention?
Because I want to build a championship team and you can't to afford to bring along a guy so he can achieve mediocrity and be the weakest link.
The quality of the coach should be above the level of your talent until the talent rises to above average as a whole.
The coach should have prior experience in developing players, not be learning on the job how to develop players.
Because we shouldn't have to be outcoached every night while waiting for some mythical day to arrive when Fisher will outcoach others.
Because we could make the playoffs and with Fisher we will not.
Playoff experience is necessary to build a championship ready roster because it is typically necessary to lose in the playoffs before you can win it all in the playoffs.
Because we need to achieve the best this roster can achieve so we can make a strong case in free agency.
Because you don't do everything you can to upgrade the roster and let it be managed by a grade Z coach.
I think the above points are important.
Let's say the people who say our roster is garbage are correct. Even if that's true, there is no still no excuse for Fisher. Having a bad team doesn't justify trotting out the worst coach in NBA history. If the goal is to develop players, why didn't we go after someone who has a track record of doing that? Someone like Skiles, Jackson, Hollins, or heck, even George Karl.
People saying Boston is better than us. We have Carmelo Anthony, and their best player is f*cking Isaiah Thomas, who isn't even starting now. Watching a guy like Stevens coaching the hell out of Boston is so damn difficult to accept while having endure Fisher on a nightly basis.
AmazingJason wrote:IAmTheBest wrote:StephNYKurry wrote:Spurs (55 Wins last year)
Bucks
Cavs x 2 (53 wins last year...Finals runner up...2nd best player in the World)
Hornets
Hawks (won 60 games last year)
Bucks and Hornets both playoff teams.
Why are people beside themselves? Maybe we just aren't that good?
Everything you posted is irrelevant
We actually notched wins against cleveland and san antonio last season - our worst season in franchise history. does that mean anything
instead of posting meaningless records, you have to actually watch and analyze games.
we choked away easily winnable games mainly because of fisher's incompetence. that is the fact of the matter and everything else is irrelevant. Once is an accident. Twice is coincidence. Three times is a pattern. unfortnately, we are up to the "three times" part and this pattern is dangerous for the team and its future
Aside from that, Fisher basically admitted last night that the loss was due to poor coaching. The same exact poor coaching that has cost us wins and potential wins in the past.
TheBigBoss wrote:People have to remember that this is a new team, so in a tight game against a championship caliber team like yesterday, Fish rode with Gallo, Lou, and Lance who developed chemistry last season together. Thats why he had them out there.


Greenie wrote:IAmTheBest wrote:JBreezeNY wrote:Robin Lopez is our starting center when in reality he is a backup, his offensive game is also very.....shaky.
Porzingis is a rookie, picks up a lot of foolish fouls, his stamina is still building, his shot struggles & he is not aggressive as a scorer.
Melo is Melo for better or worse.
Arron is our 2nd scorer when he is really a 4th/5th scorer, not to mention his defense has fallen.
Galloway is good.
That's not a playoff calibre team especially when the bench is so erratic.
Robin Lopez was the starting center on a team that won 53 games in a completely stacked western conference. He's still a starter now.
Porzingis is a rookie, but he is quite effective in the minutes he does play. His help defense is excellent and his length is disruptive. He gives us a legit 7 footer twin towers situation in our starting lineup and he can stretch the floor. He has lapses and rookie mistakes sometimes, but luckily we have some depth at the 4
Melo is melo - agreed. but when healthy (he still seems very rusty) he is an efficient 25+ ppg scorer.
Agree with afflalo, but he's still a solid starting shooting guard for eastern conference standards. the position is shallow to begin with
Galloway is good
By playoff caliber I'm not saying we are definitely going to make the playoffs. I'm saying our roster is easily talented enough for it.
Boston is going hard for a playoff spot and their roster sucks compared to ours. the difference is that they have an excellent coach. Our coach is what is costing us big.
You have to see that we have leads on teams like the cavs and spurs for much of the game and then at the end completely collapse. hell, we even collapse in the 4th against garbage teams like the bucks and hornets. It's not like we are outmatched the entire game due to lack of talent and rarely have a lead. this is a clear coaching problem. The talent is there but then you have stupid ass lineups on the floor during which leads evaporate within a matter of minutes. there are stretches when the lineups cannot generate offense and/or get stops. these are lineup problems due to fisher's tactical incompetence
Robin was the 5th starter in Portland. He played next to LMA, Batum, Wes Matthews and Lillard. He was the 5th starter. What does that mean? That means that is was the 5th best player in that starting lineup. Here, you can make an argument for him being the 2nd starter.
Afflalo sits in the same boat as Robin. Arron also came off the bench in Portland. He only started due to injury.
Galloway does not start for us. Jose does though...
Boston has a much better roster than us.

Capn'O wrote:My 2c:
I'm proud of Melo for calling out the team for stagnating around him. Two critical possessions, the team wandered around aimlessly before moving the ball to Melo with less than 5 seconds left on the clock. On one of those possessions, KP had a better shot earlier. On the other, he and Calderon had a better shot. The next possession, Melo came to the ball early in the clock and shot it to avoid what happened previously.
The other guys need to take theirs. They can't just hope for Melo to bail them out because that makes the offense all to predictable. Him calling out this dynamic is about the biggest vocal leaders stance I've seen from him and I applaud it. Hope the team responds properly and lays a smackdown to NOP tomorrow.
Thugger HBC wrote:Capn'O wrote:My 2c:
I'm proud of Melo for calling out the team for stagnating around him. Two critical possessions, the team wandered around aimlessly before moving the ball to Melo with less than 5 seconds left on the clock. On one of those possessions, KP had a better shot earlier. On the other, he and Calderon had a better shot. The next possession, Melo came to the ball early in the clock and shot it to avoid what happened previously.
The other guys need to take theirs. They can't just hope for Melo to bail them out because that makes the offense all to predictable. Him calling out this dynamic is about the biggest vocal leaders stance I've seen from him and I applaud it. Hope the team responds properly and lays a smackdown to NOP tomorrow.
I noticed that as well, although I would say if those guys took those shots and missed, the narrative woulld have been as to why Melo isnt taking over a late game like LeBron was.
I'm all for players taking good/open shots but unless called upon, that's the stars moment normally. but the cast should be ready when called.


Thugger HBC wrote:Capn'O wrote:My 2c:
I'm proud of Melo for calling out the team for stagnating around him. Two critical possessions, the team wandered around aimlessly before moving the ball to Melo with less than 5 seconds left on the clock. On one of those possessions, KP had a better shot earlier. On the other, he and Calderon had a better shot. The next possession, Melo came to the ball early in the clock and shot it to avoid what happened previously.
The other guys need to take theirs. They can't just hope for Melo to bail them out because that makes the offense all to predictable. Him calling out this dynamic is about the biggest vocal leaders stance I've seen from him and I applaud it. Hope the team responds properly and lays a smackdown to NOP tomorrow.
I noticed that as well, although I would say if those guys took those shots and missed, the narrative woulld have been as to why Melo isnt taking over a late game like LeBron was.
I'm all for players taking good/open shots but unless called upon, that's the stars moment normally. but the cast should be ready when called.

IAmTheBest wrote:Thugger HBC wrote:Capn'O wrote:My 2c:
I'm proud of Melo for calling out the team for stagnating around him. Two critical possessions, the team wandered around aimlessly before moving the ball to Melo with less than 5 seconds left on the clock. On one of those possessions, KP had a better shot earlier. On the other, he and Calderon had a better shot. The next possession, Melo came to the ball early in the clock and shot it to avoid what happened previously.
The other guys need to take theirs. They can't just hope for Melo to bail them out because that makes the offense all to predictable. Him calling out this dynamic is about the biggest vocal leaders stance I've seen from him and I applaud it. Hope the team responds properly and lays a smackdown to NOP tomorrow.
I noticed that as well, although I would say if those guys took those shots and missed, the narrative woulld have been as to why Melo isnt taking over a late game like LeBron was.
I'm all for players taking good/open shots but unless called upon, that's the stars moment normally. but the cast should be ready when called.
they gave it to him so late though
it's one thing to defer to the star from the get go
it's another thing to try to get something done with a stagnant offense, fail, and then give the ball to the star with no time to go to work
Thugger HBC wrote:AmazingJason wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:
Because I want to build a championship team and you can't to afford to bring along a guy so he can achieve mediocrity and be the weakest link.
The quality of the coach should be above the level of your talent until the talent rises to above average as a whole.
The coach should have prior experience in developing players, not be learning on the job how to develop players.
Because we shouldn't have to be outcoached every night while waiting for some mythical day to arrive when Fisher will outcoach others.
Because we could make the playoffs and with Fisher we will not.
Playoff experience is necessary to build a championship ready roster because it is typically necessary to lose in the playoffs before you can win it all in the playoffs.
Because we need to achieve the best this roster can achieve so we can make a strong case in free agency.
Because you don't do everything you can to upgrade the roster and let it be managed by a grade Z coach.
I think the above points are important.
Let's say the people who say our roster is garbage are correct. Even if that's true, there is no still no excuse for Fisher. Having a bad team doesn't justify trotting out the worst coach in NBA history. If the goal is to develop players, why didn't we go after someone who has a track record of doing that? Someone like Skiles, Jackson, Hollins, or heck, even George Karl.
People saying Boston is better than us. We have Carmelo Anthony, and their best player is f*cking Isaiah Thomas, who isn't even starting now. Watching a guy like Stevens coaching the hell out of Boston is so damn difficult to accept while having endure Fisher on a nightly basis.
Just curious, where are folks getting the notion that Thomas doesnt start?
But anyway, Boston does have a solid roster, although no perennial all-star, similar to the Bucks and Hornets.
Melo is keeping the team in games or is a legit threat so teams plan accordingly and our roster is subpar.
Fisher has awful rotations and late game decisions, but these guys do play hard for him, and thats likely do to the fact that he plays his full deck quite often.

Capn'O wrote:Thugger HBC wrote:Capn'O wrote:My 2c:
I'm proud of Melo for calling out the team for stagnating around him. Two critical possessions, the team wandered around aimlessly before moving the ball to Melo with less than 5 seconds left on the clock. On one of those possessions, KP had a better shot earlier. On the other, he and Calderon had a better shot. The next possession, Melo came to the ball early in the clock and shot it to avoid what happened previously.
The other guys need to take theirs. They can't just hope for Melo to bail them out because that makes the offense all to predictable. Him calling out this dynamic is about the biggest vocal leaders stance I've seen from him and I applaud it. Hope the team responds properly and lays a smackdown to NOP tomorrow.
I noticed that as well, although I would say if those guys took those shots and missed, the narrative woulld have been as to why Melo isnt taking over a late game like LeBron was.
I'm all for players taking good/open shots but unless called upon, that's the stars moment normally. but the cast should be ready when called.
People can say what they want. They probably would have missed but those are shots KP especially ultimately needs to take. That makes Melo's job easier, make or miss. The fact that he recognizes this and is vocalizing it is huge, imo.