Funky Tut wrote:MrMiyagi wrote:Funky Tut wrote:
Is not making the playoffs in 5 years not enough evidence of mediocrity for you?
Cleveland is mediocre too. They only made the playoffs once in the past 5 seasons. Terrible. #DeadSerious #ThePastDeterminestheFuture
Cleveland is a lotto team without Lebron. You're forgetting one factor, they have superstars only because the best player in the league happened to be born in Ohio. Cleveland is a door mat franchise that no one in the right mind would ever want to play for, but Lebron changes all of that and now the are elite.
My concern is that in the NBA, you don't want to be stuck on that treadmill of mediocrity like the Suns have been on for a while now. You either need to be terrible or you need to be elite. Stockpiling 12-15th position picks isn't going to save a franchise, and not being able to lure top end FA's isn't going to help you get out of mediocrity either. Suns are in a tough position right now, they can put a decent product on the court but the product is never going to make a deep playoff push currently.
It depends though. Most of the teams that are elite got that way not by trying to suck and get a high pick.
As you mentioned, the Cavs got LeBron because he was born there. The Spurs got Aldridge because he had family there. Outside of him, other than Duncan, all of their good players were mid round, late first round or second round picks. So with them it's a combination of factors, and luckily having Robinson out the year Duncan was in the draft.
The Warriors never sucked that bad to get the players they have now. They were always hovering around the 9th seed too, and had one semi bad year and got the 7th pick and Curry...other than that, mostly savvy draft picks, but not REAL high top 3 picks or anything.
So the above three are the best teams. OKC is one example of tearing it down and just hitting home runs with 2 or 3 picks and getting top 5-10 players. However, it also comes down to luck. It has been mentioned that if they had the #1 pick the year they took Durant, they would have taken Oden, and if they had the #2 pick the year they took Westbrook, they would have taken Beasley. So luck plays a factor. The Sixers haven't been so lucky trying this.
Clippers sucked for YEARS but they never got really good until they were able to trade for Chris Paul. They did finally get one great surefire #1 pick by winning the lottery and getting Blake, but even with that, they needed to make a trade for a premier player to even GET to the playoffs. Even with those guys, they still haven't gotten real deep into the playoffs.
Dallas was good for a long time and Dirk was drafted 9th.
Houston got pretty good the last few years after being the 9th seed year in and year out because of a trade.
Memphis got good from making a good FA signing, and the development of Marc Gasol, who they traded for, along with the emergence of Conley, but not from a bunch of high picks.
Many of the best players in the nba were not extremely high picks (Jimmy Butler, Paul George, Kawhi Leonard)
Minnesota has stocked some good talent, but not from trying to suck, because their all star wanted to be traded the year they were hovering around 500 so they were able to trade him for a star in Wiggins...they didn't get Wiggins from trying to suck. Even after getting Wiggins, they still tried to be competitive by playing Rubio, Kevin Martin, Pekovic, trading for Thaddeus Young, etc, but then got decimated by injuries and ended up luckily getting the #1 pick.