Postgame: Bears at Packers
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Postgame: Bears at Packers
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,685
- And1: 27,269
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Postgame: Bears at Packers
The Pack still sucks. The Pack still sucks. The Pack still sucks. The Pack still sucks. They really, really, really, really, really, really suck. Yes the Pack still sucks.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
- wichmae
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,762
- And1: 1,060
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: Milwaukee
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
**** you Davante Adams. YOu **** the bed tonight. No effort and got bullied by people smaller than you. You soft piece of ****. Bieber is harder than your bitch ass.
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
-
- Junior
- Posts: 441
- And1: 291
- Joined: Jan 19, 2008
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
Davante is horrible. No hustle, runs wrong routes and dropping a lot of passes. Why is he seeing the field? Give Janis a chance, can't do any worse.
Re: RE: Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
- humanrefutation
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 32,781
- And1: 16,451
- Joined: Jun 05, 2006
-
Re: RE: Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
wichmae wrote:**** you Davante Adams. YOu **** the bed tonight. No effort and got bullied by people smaller than you. You soft piece of ****. Bieber is harder than your bitch ass.
Tell me, how do you really feel?
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
- LittleRooster
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,599
- And1: 3,247
- Joined: Apr 02, 2010
-
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
wichmae wrote:**** you Davante Adams. YOu **** the bed tonight. No effort and got bullied by people smaller than you. You soft piece of ****. Bieber is harder than your bitch ass.
I second that. Janis can't be worse, right?
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,289
- And1: 7,935
- Joined: Feb 16, 2006
- Location: Flickin' It
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
I bumped my old thread hoping for another reverse jinx, but this team just has issues. 13 points against the Bears at home and that's with an automatic 3 from Janis' kick return. Its not fun watching games right now. It's one thing when you lose to more talented teams, but when you keep committing the same mistakes over and over its just frustrating.
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 244
- And1: 68
- Joined: Nov 29, 2014
-
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
Pretty creative call on that last play. Every receiver ran a curl 2 yards into the end zone. No depth... Nobody crossing... I'm SHOCKED that nobody was open.
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,685
- And1: 27,269
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
I think we're going to miss the playoffs. What game left on our schedule are you confident we could win? Obviously not the Lions, they are playing so much better than us right now. Dallas? Without Romo or Bryant, sure. But they're back. At Raiders? Maybe. At Arizona? LOL. Vikings? Not unless they majorly **** up.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,289
- And1: 7,935
- Joined: Feb 16, 2006
- Location: Flickin' It
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
You guys are coming down way too hard on Adams. The guy can dunk a basketball between his legs.
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
- dedned
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,726
- And1: 1,465
- Joined: Feb 02, 2005
- Location: nowhere
-
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
Mags FTW wrote:I bumped my old thread hoping for another reverse jinx, but this team just has issues. 13 points against the Bears at home and that's with an automatic 3 from Janis' kick return. Its not fun watching games right now. It's one thing when you lose to more talented teams, but when you keep committing the same mistakes over and over its just frustrating.
No ****. This team is a waste of time.

Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
- Matches Malone
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,776
- And1: 26,194
- Joined: Nov 23, 2005
-
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
Why couldn't we run a few times when in the redzone? We had plenty of time to make it a little easier on ourselves.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,685
- And1: 27,269
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
LittleRooster wrote:wichmae wrote:**** you Davante Adams. YOu **** the bed tonight. No effort and got bullied by people smaller than you. You soft piece of ****. Bieber is harder than your bitch ass.
I second that. Janis can't be worse, right?
As was said in the game thread, Janis running go routes would be more productive than any of our receivers right now. Even if it's not thrown to him, he at least is a deep threat that requires extra attention. We have none of that right now. He had that 50 something yard catch against the Chargers, drew a 50 yard PI call last week and has returned two kicks deep into opposing territory the last couple of weeks and these dumb **** coaches still don't get him on the field.
This whole coaching staff can GTFO as far as I'm concerned.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
- humanrefutation
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 32,781
- And1: 16,451
- Joined: Jun 05, 2006
-
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
I mean, they really didn't look much better last week.
This is a problem of season-altering consequences. No one would have predicted that this offense would take such a huge step back this season, even with Jordy hurt. They have. Rodgers is on an island out there with the lack of help from his receivers, and he's not doing much to change that with some of the ducks he's throwing.
It's bad, people. I know we all get that, but I don't see why anyone should expect anything different right now. They haven't shown **** in the last several weeks.
This is a problem of season-altering consequences. No one would have predicted that this offense would take such a huge step back this season, even with Jordy hurt. They have. Rodgers is on an island out there with the lack of help from his receivers, and he's not doing much to change that with some of the ducks he's throwing.
It's bad, people. I know we all get that, but I don't see why anyone should expect anything different right now. They haven't shown **** in the last several weeks.
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
**** THIS TEAM! JUST **** IT.
On a night where 4 goes on the wall, Starr goes through agony to be here and to tie the all time record with the bears we play flat.
The Defense isn't to blame other than they couldn't get a pick off of jay **** cutler.
The offense where do I start? Yes lacey **** the bed on a fumble but the guy is running mad and we bench him basically in the second half?
I continue to ask why Richard Rodgers is even on the field when split out wide? If Cobb can't get open split out wide why not put Janis out wide and cobb in Rodgers place? Also as many have mentioned Adams is an overrated piece of ****, absolute Boyking 2.0.
I'm sorry but when theirs 40 seconds left inside the 10 and your biggest running threat in lacey is on the bench that pathetic. Along with R. Rogers only great gift is finding holes in red zone D and you put Janis in? Like wtf is the Clements thinking?
A highly speculative thing to say is this team lacks the leadership since Woodson left, no leader on this team and it showed. With the great night in GB history and you come out and play a game like that every single man on the 53 should be ashamed.
On a night where 4 goes on the wall, Starr goes through agony to be here and to tie the all time record with the bears we play flat.
The Defense isn't to blame other than they couldn't get a pick off of jay **** cutler.
The offense where do I start? Yes lacey **** the bed on a fumble but the guy is running mad and we bench him basically in the second half?
I continue to ask why Richard Rodgers is even on the field when split out wide? If Cobb can't get open split out wide why not put Janis out wide and cobb in Rodgers place? Also as many have mentioned Adams is an overrated piece of ****, absolute Boyking 2.0.
I'm sorry but when theirs 40 seconds left inside the 10 and your biggest running threat in lacey is on the bench that pathetic. Along with R. Rogers only great gift is finding holes in red zone D and you put Janis in? Like wtf is the Clements thinking?
A highly speculative thing to say is this team lacks the leadership since Woodson left, no leader on this team and it showed. With the great night in GB history and you come out and play a game like that every single man on the 53 should be ashamed.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
-
- Jazz Forum GTS Champion 2018-2019
- Posts: 1,542
- And1: 362
- Joined: Oct 28, 2013
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
trwi7 wrote:I think we're going to miss the playoffs. What game left on our schedule are you confident we could win? Obviously not the Lions, they are playing so much better than us right now. Dallas? Without Romo or Bryant, sure. But they're back. At Raiders? Maybe. At Arizona? LOL. Vikings? Not unless they majorly **** up.
Didn't Romo re-break his collar bone? Pack has a chance.
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,106
- And1: 5,390
- Joined: Jun 02, 2014
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
I'm a Broncos fan, but came here just to say, damn, Davante Adams is atrocious lol. The Peyton Manning of WRs, this year.
Postgame: Bears at Packers
- JHSFIVE
- Starter
- Posts: 2,482
- And1: 214
- Joined: Jan 27, 2003
Postgame: Bears at Packers
Cobb sucks too. Htf is dude gonna be completely covered by a lb in crunch time? Cobb should be able to completely take advantage and can't!?!? He gives up on his routes to easy
OVERREACT
Re: RE: Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
- humanrefutation
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 32,781
- And1: 16,451
- Joined: Jun 05, 2006
-
Re: RE: Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
jazzfanWA wrote:trwi7 wrote:I think we're going to miss the playoffs. What game left on our schedule are you confident we could win? Obviously not the Lions, they are playing so much better than us right now. Dallas? Without Romo or Bryant, sure. But they're back. At Raiders? Maybe. At Arizona? LOL. Vikings? Not unless they majorly **** up.
Didn't Romo re-break his collar bone? Pack has a chance.
Yeah, Romo is done.
Anyway, I don't have confidence that they can beat anyone right now.
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
- brewbucks
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,950
- And1: 861
- Joined: May 11, 2012
- Location: Milwaukee
-
Re: Postgame: Bears at Packers
trwi7 wrote:I think we're going to miss the playoffs. What game left on our schedule are you confident we could win? Obviously not the Lions, they are playing so much better than us right now. Dallas? Without Romo or Bryant, sure. But they're back. At Raiders? Maybe. At Arizona? LOL. Vikings? Not unless they majorly **** up.
Might have a shot against Dallas because Romo is out for the season.