Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- Qwigglez
- Forum Mod - Suns
- Posts: 21,553
- And1: 14,846
- Joined: Jul 10, 2009
- Contact:
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
so is Weems guarding LB?
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- bwgood77
- Global Mod
- Posts: 98,149
- And1: 61,003
- Joined: Feb 06, 2009
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
Well I hope if we don't win, which obviously looks impossible, I do hope that we at least only lose by 8 or less so JellyRolling doesn't lose $80.
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- thamadkant
- Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
- Posts: 16,916
- And1: 8,599
- Joined: Jan 06, 2007
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
DRK wrote:Where is Len?
Hornacek allowing Warriors play the way they want to play... 5 small players... run and run.
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,000
- And1: 7,028
- Joined: Feb 18, 2015
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
DRK wrote:
DRK wrote:Cutter wrote:Suns have no perimeter defense. We rotate too much on help defense and leave the man on the perimeter open.
But we have PJ Tucker!!!






Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,145
- And1: 6,555
- Joined: Jun 05, 2006
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
Knight never gets a call
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- bwgood77
- Global Mod
- Posts: 98,149
- And1: 61,003
- Joined: Feb 06, 2009
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
1UPZ wrote:DRK wrote:Where is Len?
Hornacek allowing Warriors play the way they want to play... 5 small players... run and run.
Haha, that would make it worse. Cleveland was looking to beat them in the finals, and they went small, and starting crushing the Cavs, so they HAD TO pretty much bench Mozgov for the rest of the series because they could at least keep it closer with 4 shooters on the floor. But the bad thing is, GS has 5 when they go small.
If Cleveland, with a healthy Love can go 5 out, with Kyrie, JR Smith, Delladova, LeBron and Love, that is by far the best team that has a prayer and perhaps a good chance against them. Last year they couldn't because they had to play Tristan at the 5 and he can't shoot.
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- OzzyAZ
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,491
- And1: 1,166
- Joined: Nov 09, 2006
- Location: Possibly Bryan Colangelo
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
Who's the center right now? Bledsoe? Warren?
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- RaisingArizona
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,788
- And1: 7,669
- Joined: Apr 23, 2009
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
DRK wrote:Where is Len?
Sucking so on the bench again

Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- RaisingArizona
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,788
- And1: 7,669
- Joined: Apr 23, 2009
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
bwgood77 wrote:Well I hope if we don't win, which obviously looks impossible, I do hope that we at least only lose by 8 or less so JellyRolling doesn't lose $80.
Sometimes the lesson is more valuable than the monetary loss.

Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- Qwigglez
- Forum Mod - Suns
- Posts: 21,553
- And1: 14,846
- Joined: Jul 10, 2009
- Contact:
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
Oh snaps we got a call!
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- thamadkant
- Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
- Posts: 16,916
- And1: 8,599
- Joined: Jan 06, 2007
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
it
Suns small ball is vastly different to how Cavs can run small ball... first thing, Cavs have good defenders in Lebron, Della, Thompson, Shumpert.... Suns have dont.
If they meet again in the finals, a healthy Cavs can throw Love/James/Shumpert/Irving/Della... and have excellent defense still and can score at will against the Warriors.
bwgood77 wrote:1UPZ wrote:DRK wrote:Where is Len?
Hornacek allowing Warriors play the way they want to play... 5 small players... run and run.
Haha, that would make it worse. Cleveland was looking to beat them in the finals, and they went small, and starting crushing the Cavs, so they HAD TO pretty much bench Mozgov for the rest of the series because they could at least keep it closer with 4 shooters on the floor. But the bad thing is, GS has 5 when they go small.
If Cleveland, with a healthy Love can go 5 out, with Kyrie, JR Smith, Delladova, LeBron and Love, that is by far the best team that has a prayer and perhaps a good chance against them. Last year they couldn't because they had to play Tristan at the 5 and he can't shoot.
Suns small ball is vastly different to how Cavs can run small ball... first thing, Cavs have good defenders in Lebron, Della, Thompson, Shumpert.... Suns have dont.
If they meet again in the finals, a healthy Cavs can throw Love/James/Shumpert/Irving/Della... and have excellent defense still and can score at will against the Warriors.
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- thamadkant
- Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
- Posts: 16,916
- And1: 8,599
- Joined: Jan 06, 2007
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
Weems is $hit.... waste of a contract.
Might be better off on a team that sets up proper plays for him.
Might be better off on a team that sets up proper plays for him.
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,145
- And1: 6,555
- Joined: Jun 05, 2006
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
Pelicans are down 21 vs the Clippers right now. We suck man.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
-
- Suns Forum College Scout
- Posts: 17,177
- And1: 6,908
- Joined: Jun 25, 2009
- Location: the Arizona desert
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
1UPZ wrote:Weems is $hit.... waste of a contract.
Might be better off on a team that sets up proper plays for him.
There are a number of guys stealing the Suns' money this year. How many years does Chandler have left?
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- Qwigglez
- Forum Mod - Suns
- Posts: 21,553
- And1: 14,846
- Joined: Jul 10, 2009
- Contact:
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
Lebron can score at will sure, but Shump is super inconsistent and Love being guarded by Draymond I don't see him scoring 20+ on him. Warriors would still win 4-2 in a series.
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- Qwigglez
- Forum Mod - Suns
- Posts: 21,553
- And1: 14,846
- Joined: Jul 10, 2009
- Contact:
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
I wish Warren was 4 inches taller so he can play the 4 for us. He'd be perfect.
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- bwgood77
- Global Mod
- Posts: 98,149
- And1: 61,003
- Joined: Feb 06, 2009
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
1UPZ wrote:itbwgood77 wrote:1UPZ wrote:
Hornacek allowing Warriors play the way they want to play... 5 small players... run and run.
Haha, that would make it worse. Cleveland was looking to beat them in the finals, and they went small, and starting crushing the Cavs, so they HAD TO pretty much bench Mozgov for the rest of the series because they could at least keep it closer with 4 shooters on the floor. But the bad thing is, GS has 5 when they go small.
If Cleveland, with a healthy Love can go 5 out, with Kyrie, JR Smith, Delladova, LeBron and Love, that is by far the best team that has a prayer and perhaps a good chance against them. Last year they couldn't because they had to play Tristan at the 5 and he can't shoot.
Suns small ball is vastly different to how Cavs can run small ball... first thing, Cavs have good defenders in Lebron, Della, Thompson, Shumpert.... Suns have dont.
If they meet again in the finals, a healthy Cavs can throw Love/James/Shumpert/Irving/Della... and have excellent defense still and can score at will against the Warriors.
Yeah, I certainly admit they have better players than we do. Not sure what your point is there.
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
-
- Senior
- Posts: 538
- And1: 251
- Joined: Jul 18, 2014
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
Brunch of ball hogs doing the weave and heave. This is fun.
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- bwgood77
- Global Mod
- Posts: 98,149
- And1: 61,003
- Joined: Feb 06, 2009
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
Qwigglez wrote:I wish Warren was 4 inches taller so he can play the 4 for us. He'd be perfect.
Well if more teams go small ball he could play it. I love a lineup with Booker at 3 and him at 4, especially if he can also shoot the 3. If so we could keep Tyson or Len in there much of the time with that shooting lineup.
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,776
- And1: 2,012
- Joined: Nov 25, 2010
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
Archie is a caged animal. 
