Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- thamadkant
- Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
- Posts: 16,916
- And1: 8,599
- Joined: Jan 06, 2007
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
Suns should move Warren to the starting lineup now.... trade Morris....maybe Tucker too.
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- Qwigglez
- Forum Mod - Suns
- Posts: 21,553
- And1: 14,846
- Joined: Jul 10, 2009
- Contact:
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
I hope we trade PJ Tucker with Kieff for Nene just so we can have some more cap room next summer. I want Warren to start. We'd have three guys who can all average over 20 points a game in the starting lineup. Hell, the wizards don't even need to give us a pick, actually we can make it more fair for the Suns by giving them Weems for Dudley also.
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
-
- Senior
- Posts: 538
- And1: 251
- Joined: Jul 18, 2014
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
Still waiting for peeps to change their vote
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- Qwigglez
- Forum Mod - Suns
- Posts: 21,553
- And1: 14,846
- Joined: Jul 10, 2009
- Contact:
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
Wow Green knew he got that trip-dub so he went to foul Booker, lol.
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- thamadkant
- Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
- Posts: 16,916
- And1: 8,599
- Joined: Jan 06, 2007
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
Qwigglez wrote:I hope we trade PJ Tucker with Kieff for Nene just so we can have some more cap room next summer. I want Warren to start. We'd have three guys who can all average over 20 points a game in the starting lineup. Hell, the wizards don't even need to give us a pick, actually we can make it more fair for the Suns by giving them Weems for Dudley also.
Yeah, I proposed something similar. For Nene and a 2nd rounder.
Nene atleast can rebound and body-up inside, giving Chandler some help against big guys.
Suns then offer contract to Barnes or another FA that suits their needs.
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,473
- And1: 2,229
- Joined: Feb 13, 2009
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
shoulda passed it archie
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,000
- And1: 7,028
- Joined: Feb 18, 2015
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
1UPZ wrote:Suns should move Warren to the starting lineup now.... trade Morris....maybe Tucker too.
Are you sure 1UPZ? I mean really sure?

1UPZ wrote:Qwigglez wrote:I hope we trade PJ Tucker with Kieff for Nene just so we can have some more cap room next summer. I want Warren to start. We'd have three guys who can all average over 20 points a game in the starting lineup. Hell, the wizards don't even need to give us a pick, actually we can make it more fair for the Suns by giving them Weems for Dudley also.
Yeah, I proposed something similar. For Nene and a 2nd rounder.
Nene atleast can rebound and body-up inside, giving Chandler some help against big guys.
Suns then offer contract to Barnes or another FA that suits their needs.






Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- Qwigglez
- Forum Mod - Suns
- Posts: 21,553
- And1: 14,846
- Joined: Jul 10, 2009
- Contact:
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
Archie is a savage. He is doing his best to show Horny why he deserves rotation minutes. Unfortunately, he just doesn't fit into the system of the team...
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- grumpysaddle
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,940
- And1: 14,265
- Joined: Feb 22, 2009
- Location: San Diego
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
They need to find Warren. He needs that 30.

Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- Sunsss
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,342
- And1: 1,074
- Joined: Apr 04, 2010
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
Well, at least they didn't break the 3-pt made record.
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,421
- And1: 12,364
- Joined: May 13, 2011
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- bwgood77
- Global Mod
- Posts: 98,152
- And1: 61,004
- Joined: Feb 06, 2009
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
JellyRolling wrote:I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread
You can start this at 20 seconds.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtkST5-ZFHw[/youtube]
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- RaisingArizona
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,788
- And1: 7,669
- Joined: Apr 23, 2009
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
JellyRolling wrote:I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread
Bill Hornacek. He didn't have his team prepared to play, again.

Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- bwgood77
- Global Mod
- Posts: 98,152
- And1: 61,004
- Joined: Feb 06, 2009
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
ginobiliflops wrote:JellyRolling wrote:I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread I didn't cover the spread
Bill Hornacek. He didn't have his team prepared to play, again.
They actually played pretty well, despite their leader going out early. They are a historic team and we are a work in process.
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,787
- And1: 2,326
- Joined: Jun 18, 2008
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
On an unrelated note, Westbrook had 11 turnovers tonight. Woof.
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- RaisingArizona
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,788
- And1: 7,669
- Joined: Apr 23, 2009
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
I disagree. Losing by 30 at home is embarrassing regardless of who you're playing.

Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- bondom34
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 66,716
- And1: 50,290
- Joined: Mar 01, 2013
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
Gorilla Warfare wrote:On an unrelated note, Westbrook had 11 turnovers tonight. Woof.
DJ Augustin was the best PG on the court.

MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
- bwgood77
- Global Mod
- Posts: 98,152
- And1: 61,004
- Joined: Feb 06, 2009
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
-
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
ginobiliflops wrote:I disagree. Losing by 30 at home is embarrassing regardless of who you're playing.
Not sure who you are disagreeing with, but we lost by 19 and were only outscored by 1 after the brutal first quarter.
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
-
- No Sham, More Cam
- Posts: 17,891
- And1: 5,437
- Joined: Jun 27, 2009
- Location: Beyond the Sun
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
bwgood77 wrote:ginobiliflops wrote:I disagree. Losing by 30 at home is embarrassing regardless of who you're playing.
Not sure who you are disagreeing with, but we lost by 19 and were only outscored by 1 after the brutal first quarter.
Two, right? 30-31, 24-28, 35-32.
The real bummer was watching all those obvious fouls, and then getting called for ticky tacky crap. Also, what the heck is up with Steve Albert? Dude was saying we threw guys to the ground, hacked, slammed hard, and then you watch the replay, it's a touch foul, or just an obvious flop by GS. It was like I was watching a Denver game, but getting their feed.

Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
-
- No Sham, More Cam
- Posts: 17,891
- And1: 5,437
- Joined: Jun 27, 2009
- Location: Beyond the Sun
Re: Game 16: Golden State Warriors (16-0) @ Phoenix Suns (7-8)
1UPZ wrote:Suns should move Warren to the starting lineup now.... trade Morris....maybe Tucker too.
Why? Warren got 35 minutes tonight, and Tucker only got 16. Does it really matter who starts?
