ImageImage

The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 - Off the Cliff we go

Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop

User avatar
ChokeFasncists
RealGM
Posts: 14,978
And1: 1,501
Joined: Jan 19, 2014
 

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#201 » by ChokeFasncists » Tue Dec 8, 2015 4:18 am

Kudos to Cliff, nice chart:

Image

:nod:
MorbidHEAT wrote:My dislike for Lin started during Linsanity. It was absurd. It's probably irrational dislike at this point, but man he gets on my nerves. He's been tearing us up though.
Thanks for the honesty.
Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,487
And1: 9,282
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#202 » by Braggins » Tue Jan 12, 2016 7:49 am

My biggest criticism of Clifford at the moment is his player development philosophy. Not just because the results have obviously been very poor, but also because I think the development strategy that he has explicitly stated he follows, which is that he tells players to focus on working on what is going to get them playing time next season, is at least partially flawed.

I feel like that is a solid strategy with partially or mostly/full developed players, but when you are drafting 19 and 20 year olds you need to let them also focus heavily on developing their strengths and trying to develop what is going to get them the most out of their skill set in general. I think Clifford's philosophy has severely stunted the growth of several of our players.

Cody was immediately forced to play a role and position he had never played before and was expected to contribute with outside shooting and drives from the perimeter, which are both things that had never been strengths or major parts of his game before. If you look at our roster construction and apply Cliffords stated development philosophy to Cody, it becomes very obvious why this happened. He was never going to get many opportunities in the paint because Al Jefferson is teh post gawd and we were trying to make a playoff push with a roster of Al and a bunch of 19-21 year olds, so he was told to focus on defense, rebounding, and playing perimeter offense.

The same thing seems to have happened to Biz. With Al here he was never going to get many minutes since he is explicitly a center and he had no semblance of any kind of offensive game, so he was never going to get a chance to develop anything except defense and rebounding.

Vonleh missed training camp and the rest was history.

Kemba and MKG have turned into good players, but I think you could easily argue that both of them haven't developed as well as much as they probably should have at this point. MKG's offensive development was almost completely due to Mark Price and his first season with Clifford was an absolute disaster that had people doubting he would ever be an NBA starter despite having a promising rookie season (as a 19 year old).

Most of Kemba's development can also probably be contributed to Price as well. He has developed somewhat on defense and his shooting/finishing has improved but he really hasn't changed that much. He also struggled quite a bit initially under Clifford following his strong sophomore year.

I can't put all the blame on Clifford. Our drafting hasn't been that good and some of our players have some obvious limitations. However, I think it is hard to deny the pattern with our lack of player development. It seems to almost definitely be at least a significant part of the problem, and I would actually argue that it has possibly been a bigger issue than our drafting. I also find it hard to believe that Clifford also hasn't actually been a fairly big influence in our drafting process. It doesn't seem to be a coincidence that since we hired Clifford our last three draft picks have been attempts to draft stretch 4's.
DY_nasty
General Manager
Posts: 9,369
And1: 4,947
Joined: Apr 14, 2010

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#203 » by DY_nasty » Tue Jan 12, 2016 8:39 am

Regarding Cody.... That was a clash between coaching and FO. He was drafted to be a stretch 4 as a compliment to Al - and certainly not some key figure for our defense.

You could argue that if Cliff doesn't go against the grain and adapt to using Cody as a diving 5 and taking the time to make sure he learns to be a factor on defense, Cody ends up worse than Len.

FO and Coaching Staff didn't like Biz. I think the only coach that really appreciated Biz was Silas.

Kemba... I think the FO and Coaching Staff need to see him go just to get some real perspective on the whole situation. He's overvalued and accommodated way too much for a guy who's done a lot of nothing.
User avatar
Eoghan
RealGM
Posts: 11,315
And1: 3,293
Joined: May 20, 2009
         

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#204 » by Eoghan » Wed Jan 13, 2016 3:45 am

But, but, but, one of the big hallmarks of signing teh post gawd Al Jefferson was that he was going to mentor Charlotte's young bigs like he did with Favors and Kanter in Utah. It's not Clifford's fault Al's been too busy ripping bong hits and eating chicken to show the youngins the secrets to getting 20 and 10 without helping to win the game.
spaceballer
Head Coach
Posts: 6,581
And1: 2,707
Joined: Mar 05, 2012

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#205 » by spaceballer » Mon Jan 18, 2016 6:50 pm

I like that he takes responsibility instead of looking for a scapegoat or throwing players under the bus (even if merited) to save face like some other coaches in the league do.

[tweet]https://twitter.com/JTyree704/status/689143313144745984[/tweet]
https://twitter.com/JTyree704/status/689143313144745984
User avatar
Eoghan
RealGM
Posts: 11,315
And1: 3,293
Joined: May 20, 2009
         

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#206 » by Eoghan » Tue Jan 19, 2016 2:27 am

That's because he doesn't have Billy Boy Biyombo to kick around no more.
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,527
And1: 14,251
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#207 » by HornetJail » Tue Jan 19, 2016 3:05 am

Can we all agree that trading a lottery protected 1st to the Raptors in order to get Bismack back would be worth it? Or would Clifford play Spencer Hawes over him?
investigate Adam Silver
Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,487
And1: 9,282
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#208 » by Braggins » Tue Jan 19, 2016 3:47 am

I would do it in a heart beat, but Cliff probably would prefer Hawez. All that size... All that skill...
User avatar
LamarMatic7
Hornets Forum High-End Journalist
Posts: 9,792
And1: 2,381
Joined: Jan 02, 2011
Location: Latvia
Contact:
   

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#209 » by LamarMatic7 » Tue Jan 19, 2016 11:27 am

MotorKeepsGoing wrote:Can we all agree that trading a lottery protected 1st to the Raptors in order to get Bismack back would be worth it? Or would Clifford play Spencer Hawes over him?

I would argue that it would be spending too much for an asset which we don't exactly need that much.

a) despite his stats, I think we can all agree that Biz is at his best when playing about 20-25 minutes. a lottery protected pick would be a hefty price for such a player.

b) his skills somewhat overlap with Cody's and we have a logjam at the front-court when Al is healthy. is this really the time to spend a pick for another big? it would be moreso justified if we at least had moved one of the bigs we already have.

c) due to his shortcomings, he plays a role and possesses skills which are largely replicable. if you want a more defensive-minded big than Hawes that's fine but I bet there are athletic bigs out there who can do 70% of what Biz does in 20mpg and can be acquired for a lesser price.

d) his deal expires in the summer of 2017. if you look at him as a core asset for the future of the franchise you might as well woo him over then. if I had to put an over/under for our playoff series wins before the summer of 2017, it would probably be 0.5. thus I don't see a real need to try out such a luxury (spending a lotto-protected pick on a 25mpg center) if we're not likely to go far in the playoffs during this time span.
Image
Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,487
And1: 9,282
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#210 » by Braggins » Tue Jan 19, 2016 12:11 pm

Would you trade Cody and 2nd rounder for him?

Cody's versatility on defense is probably generally more valuable in our system, but since our other bigs are so incredibly soft I feel like we currently would be better off with someone like Biz who can just physically dominate the paint area and the rebounding game.

Cody is also worlds better on offense than Biz, but I feel like we aren't really utilizing him much more than we would Biz, so his superiority on that side of the ball isn't very relevant.

I'm not really sure what I'd do if that option was on the table. I think I would pull the trigger, but I can really see it both ways.
User avatar
BigSlam
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 51,164
And1: 8,360
Joined: Jul 01, 2005

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#211 » by BigSlam » Tue Jan 19, 2016 12:46 pm

Why are we talking fake trades in the Cliff thread?


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
B B M F 'ers
bigbob
Banned User
Posts: 552
And1: 52
Joined: Dec 13, 2015

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#212 » by bigbob » Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:23 am

got to say...cliff really speaks fancy words about defense and how important it is, how he is a devensive guru of a coach lol. I really can't reconcile that with him having bigs shooting 3 from the perimeter, lack of post defense, lack of perimeter defense, lack of PnR defense. Not getting on batums case for playing shoddy D, nor kaminskys. He is not a defensive minded coach, he is what I like to call a "yes man", an employee who serves his bosses, ie cocapitain kemba and batum, says "yes" to whatever they say
User avatar
Eoghan
RealGM
Posts: 11,315
And1: 3,293
Joined: May 20, 2009
         

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#213 » by Eoghan » Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:53 am

bigbob wrote:got to say...cliff really speaks fancy words about defense and how important it is, how he is a devensive guru of a coach lol. I really can't reconcile that with him having bigs shooting 3 from the perimeter, lack of post defense, lack of perimeter defense, lack of PnR defense. Not getting on batums case for playing shoddy D, nor kaminskys. He is not a defensive minded coach, he is what I like to call a "yes man", an employee who serves his bosses, ie cocapitain kemba and batum, says "yes" to whatever they say

Yeah, he's a player's coach. He doesn't hold the star players accountable and uses the role players for whipping boys.
swijayas
Freshman
Posts: 74
And1: 8
Joined: Sep 04, 2015
 

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#214 » by swijayas » Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:59 pm

BrotherDave wrote:
bigbob wrote:got to say...cliff really speaks fancy words about defense and how important it is, how he is a devensive guru of a coach lol. I really can't reconcile that with him having bigs shooting 3 from the perimeter, lack of post defense, lack of perimeter defense, lack of PnR defense. Not getting on batums case for playing shoddy D, nor kaminskys. He is not a defensive minded coach, he is what I like to call a "yes man", an employee who serves his bosses, ie cocapitain kemba and batum, says "yes" to whatever they say

Yeah, he's a player's coach. He doesn't hold the star players accountable and uses the role players for whipping boys.


Believe this accountability & less ISO would give significantly improved results (really enjoyed the pre-season team ball)
User avatar
Eoghan
RealGM
Posts: 11,315
And1: 3,293
Joined: May 20, 2009
         

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#215 » by Eoghan » Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:34 am

I hope Clifford is wearing some asbestos underwear...
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,279
And1: 15,505
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#216 » by yosemiteben » Tue Feb 2, 2016 8:58 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/At_The_Hive/status/694604079369195520[/tweet]

At The Hive ‏@At_The_Hive 1h1 hour ago
At The Hive Retweeted Kumar
Steve Clifford among the top coaches in points out of timeouts

Image

#narrativebuster
User avatar
fatlever
Senior Mod - Hornets
Senior Mod - Hornets
Posts: 59,044
And1: 15,617
Joined: Jun 04, 2001
Location: Terrapin Station
     

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#217 » by fatlever » Tue Feb 2, 2016 9:38 pm

I would not have expected that.
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,527
And1: 14,251
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#218 » by HornetJail » Tue Feb 2, 2016 9:46 pm

I'm very surprised. Somehow we manage to be among the worst at inbounding, but once the ball's in play, we're good apparently.
investigate Adam Silver
User avatar
BigSlam
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 51,164
And1: 8,360
Joined: Jul 01, 2005

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#219 » by BigSlam » Tue Feb 2, 2016 10:31 pm

Imagine his numbers if we actually ran the one and only baseline in bound from under our basket play successfully.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
B B M F 'ers
TinmanZBoy
General Manager
Posts: 7,803
And1: 5,122
Joined: Jul 11, 2015
         

Re: The Steve Clifford Thread 2.0 

Post#220 » by TinmanZBoy » Tue Feb 2, 2016 10:38 pm

Lin fans lol @the bottom three ;-)
Hi Clutchie, I love you... :kiss

Return to Charlotte Hornets