Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart
Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 70,101
- And1: 22,527
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
Continued from here
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
- FAH1223
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,287
- And1: 7,382
- Joined: Nov 01, 2005
- Location: Laurel, MD
-
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
- TheSecretWeapon
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,122
- And1: 877
- Joined: May 29, 2001
- Location: Milliways
- Contact:
-
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
FAH1223 wrote:Clippers want to get rid of Josh Smith
Anyway to get him?
For what purpose?
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell
Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
-- Malcolm Gladwell
Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
- J-Ves
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,054
- And1: 1,286
- Joined: May 16, 2012
-
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
FAH1223 wrote:Clippers want to get rid of Josh Smith
Anyway to get him?
Blair for smith.
I'd also consider Hump for Smith, but I'm not sure the salaries match up.
If you wanted to take a big gamble we could do Nene for Smith and Lance. We would use Smith as a small ball 5 and Lance could play 1-3 and be a defensive stopper sort of like temple is now. Both guys come off the books next year (lance has a team option next year) so they wouldn't affect our free agency. With that said I'd probably hold on to Nene, he's been darn good when he isn't injured and we do lack big man depth.
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
- FAH1223
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,287
- And1: 7,382
- Joined: Nov 01, 2005
- Location: Laurel, MD
-
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
TheSecretWeapon wrote:FAH1223 wrote:Clippers want to get rid of Josh Smith
Anyway to get him?
For what purpose?
We have no PFs on the roster aside from Humphries

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
- tontoz
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,253
- And1: 5,029
- Joined: Apr 11, 2005
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
FAH1223 wrote:TheSecretWeapon wrote:FAH1223 wrote:Clippers want to get rid of Josh Smith
Anyway to get him?
For what purpose?
We have no PFs on the roster aside from Humphries
You don't want to watch Smith trying to lead the break instead of passing to Wall who is running right beside him. Trust me as a former Atlanta resident and fan.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
- TheSecretWeapon
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,122
- And1: 877
- Joined: May 29, 2001
- Location: Milliways
- Contact:
-
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
FAH1223 wrote:TheSecretWeapon wrote:FAH1223 wrote:Clippers want to get rid of Josh Smith
Anyway to get him?
For what purpose?
We have no PFs on the roster aside from Humphries
I agree with you in the diagnosis of the problem, but not he prescription. The last time Smith rated average or better in my analysis was the 2012-13 season. The days when he was good are well in the past.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell
Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
-- Malcolm Gladwell
Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,553
- And1: 9,075
- Joined: May 02, 2012
- Location: On the Atlantic
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
Not to mention that another short term bandaid is *not* what this team needs -- we need some young assets that we can add to our going-forward core.
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,298
- And1: 2,440
- Joined: Jul 20, 2004
- Location: on a rock
-
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
I wonder if we could get Richaun Holmes from philly with Colangelo coming into power. Although probably fruitless cause Randy won't play rookies... but we need someone developing here to develop.
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
- TGW
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,336
- And1: 6,705
- Joined: Oct 22, 2010
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
I got some interest in Beal/Nene for Ibaka/Waiters. I'm not sure if I would do it, but I think it would at least give us a shot at improving the interior play.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 70,101
- And1: 22,527
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
TGW wrote:I got some interest in Beal/Nene for Ibaka/Waiters. I'm not sure if I would do it, but I think it would at least give us a shot at improving the interior play.
That would be a fantastic trade.
Ibaka is the perfect type of modern big man. He can start at PF and give the team a conventional look early in games, and then shift to center in crunch time when a 5-out floor-stretching configuration is ideal.
If we signed Durant, we'd still have about $10M left to go after a replacement SG. Fournier would be great, but probably not available at that price. Eric Gordon might be a nice alternative:
PG Wall/Sato
SG Gordon/Oubre
SF Durant/Porter
PF Ibaka/Durant
C Gortat/Ibaka
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
- TGW
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,336
- And1: 6,705
- Joined: Oct 22, 2010
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
nate33 wrote:TGW wrote:I got some interest in Beal/Nene for Ibaka/Waiters. I'm not sure if I would do it, but I think it would at least give us a shot at improving the interior play.
That would be a fantastic trade.
Ibaka is the perfect type of modern big man. He can start at PF and give the team a conventional look early in games, and then shift to center in crunch time when a 5-out floor-stretching configuration is ideal.
If we signed Durant, we'd still have about $10M left to go after a replacement SG. Fournier would be great, but probably not available at that price. Eric Gordon might be a nice alternative:
PG Wall/Sato
SG Gordon/Oubre
SF Durant/Porter
PF Ibaka/Durant
C Gortat/Ibaka
For that very reason, the Thunder wouldn't do it. I don't think they have any interest in making us better.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
- Dark Faze
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,466
- And1: 2,117
- Joined: Dec 27, 2008
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
Serge had knee surgery and has quite frankly not been as good--as well, he'll demand a hefty contract extension during this decline. I can't think of a worse idea than paying a contract year Dion Waiters either.
Brad really isn't the problem. I know he seems like it now because we're counting on him--but the point is we shouldn't be counting on him to fulfill a 1st option role. We desperately need an all-star caliber two way player to take the pressure off of our backcourt, and we need consistent shooting from the SF spot from three--which Otto isn't providing right now.
Brad really isn't the problem. I know he seems like it now because we're counting on him--but the point is we shouldn't be counting on him to fulfill a 1st option role. We desperately need an all-star caliber two way player to take the pressure off of our backcourt, and we need consistent shooting from the SF spot from three--which Otto isn't providing right now.
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 70,101
- And1: 22,527
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
Dark Faze wrote:Serge had knee surgery and has quite frankly not been as good--as well, he'll demand a hefty contract extension during this decline. I can't think of a worse idea than paying a contract year Dion Waiters either.
Brad really isn't the problem. I know he seems like it now because we're counting on him--but the point is we shouldn't be counting on him to fulfill a 1st option role. We desperately need an all-star caliber two way player to take the pressure off of our backcourt, and we need consistent shooting from the SF spot from three--which Otto isn't providing right now.
I'm not saying Beal is "the problem". He's a useful player - a legit starter in this league. But he is nothing more than that and there isn't much reason to believe he will get much better, yet we will probably get stuck matching a max offer for him. If he can be traded for a true two-way big man with perimeter range, I'm all in.
I agree that Waiters is garbage. This trade is Beal for Ibaka. Nene and Waiters are filler.
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,858
- And1: 398
- Joined: Jun 19, 2010
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
What about Rakeem Christmas. Any way we could pry him away from the Pacers?
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
- Chocolate City Jordanaire
- RealGM
- Posts: 54,528
- And1: 10,296
- Joined: Aug 05, 2001
-
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
TGW wrote:I got some interest in Beal/Nene for Ibaka/Waiters. I'm not sure if I would do it, but I think it would at least give us a shot at improving the interior play.
I would. Nice deal, TGW.
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
- Chocolate City Jordanaire
- RealGM
- Posts: 54,528
- And1: 10,296
- Joined: Aug 05, 2001
-
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
popper wrote:What about Rakeem Christmas. Any way we could pry him away from the Pacers?
Before or after December 25?
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
-
- Junior
- Posts: 340
- And1: 46
- Joined: Feb 15, 2013
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
Maybe the Knicks will look to trade Melo this offseason? If so I would do a Beal sign and trade to Knicks for Melo. If Durant comes here that would be a heck of a team if Melo and Durant could go coexist which is a question.
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,363
- And1: 1,368
- Joined: Apr 30, 2013
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
Knicks fan here. Everyone knows that you guys aren't going anywhere without a real first option anyways and KD prolly isn't even thinking about signing for Wizards at all, so you gotta trade for that star.
Melo for Beal + Porter + 2016 Washington First Rounder
This way you might be able to actually make it out of the second round for once and we'll get some pieces to build around Porz.
Melo for Beal + Porter + 2016 Washington First Rounder
This way you might be able to actually make it out of the second round for once and we'll get some pieces to build around Porz.
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,922
- And1: 1,571
- Joined: Apr 25, 2002
- Location: Tenleytown, DC
Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX
bigmandinky wrote:Knicks fan here. Everyone knows that you guys aren't going anywhere without a real first option anyways and KD prolly isn't even thinking about signing for Wizards at all, so you gotta trade for that star.
Melo for Beal + Porter + 2016 Washington First Rounder
This way you might be able to actually make it out of the second round for once and we'll get some pieces to build around Porz.
If and when the Wizards miss out on Durant this summer, (which I think is likely) I can see them turning their attention to Melo. But it doesn't make sense to do so now.
I think the trade you proposed is a little bit of an overpay based on Melo's age and injury history. If we were talking Nene (exp) + Beal + pick, I'd be more interested.
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
— Steve Martin