hcsilla wrote:Patsfan1081 wrote:hcsilla wrote:
McCollum's TS% is 53 which is exactly the league average so I wouldn't call him efficient.
I think that Noel's value is still higher but swapping the picks and addig Leonard is too much for the Blazers. BTW, I doubt that Leonard is a good fit to Okafor due both defensive shortcomings, whereas the future Vonleh-Noah frontcourt with Plumlee backing up both seems both interesting and promising.
Noel for McCollum, 2016 lottery protected 1st seems a more simple and balanced trade.
Not a fan of ts%, it doesn't distinguish between three and two pointers. McCollum takes six threes a game so it's obvious that ts% isn't going to favor him.
Completely wrong, ts% does distinguish between three and two pointers, that's exactly the point (besides doing the same between FG's and Ft's) of implementing ts%.
Yeah a lot of this. The formula for TS% is supposed to be a basic version of points per possession.
The actual formula is points / 2*(fga +.44fta)
In terms of a 2 pointer versus a 3 pointer, making 50% of 2 pointers is the same as making 33% of 3 pta attempts, points are the numerator so it makes a big difference. It is similar to efg% that way. Where it differs from efg% is that it tries to capture the efficiency of a guy getting free throw attempts. Doing this with a general standard formula which needs to capture an average free throw versus looking at individual possessions for a guy runs the unfortunate cost that a guy that shoots the technical free throws for a team will get his numbers boosted, as it is not free throws drawn by the guy. Another problem is turnovers -- some players will have a bunch of turnovers and yet TS% is not effected at all because they simply lost the ball before shooting.
But TS% is still the best 'simple' stat for scoring efficiency as it does get 2's versus 3's (fg% doesn't) and free throws (efg% doesn't), and points per possession aggregated data is less fully available per synnergy etc.