CmonScal wrote:musiqsoulchild wrote:Fred Hoiberg has a pacemaker in his heart. He's had multiple cardiac procedures. A long NBA career, a strong showing in the FO in Minny and a distinguished resume in NCAA.
I doubt he gives 2 flying **** on how Jimmy thinks he should coach the team. Especially, when that feedback is delivered via the media.
Jimmy - you made your money, you are playing well, just know that your hardship to success story doesn't mean other folks in the NBA don't have the same stories.
Fred's paid his dues already.
Fred's paid his dues already - what does that mean? That he can sit back and let the team coach itself? We've seen this season that Fred Hoiberg has been a below average NBA coach. We've passed the quarter point of the season and he still doesn't understand how to manage simple NBA rotations and substitutions. That's not to say he can't get better - I certainly would bet he will in the future. But because he's been around the league a while means that we all can give him a pass? You know who else "paid his dues already"? Byron Scott. Sam Mitchell. I simply don't see how paying your dues makes you infallible.
Speaking to a larger point, I'm not entirely bothered by Jimmy's comments because I think it's going to mix things up in the locker room quite a bit. Could that be bad for the team? There's a possibility. However, continuing with the current status quo won't result in anything good, so I'd rather have someone looking to change things than standing pat and accepting mediocrity.
You didn't get my point at all.
Would Fred Hoiberg be a better coach if he:
1) Tweeted that Niko Mirotic is a terrible teammate?
2) Told Sam Smith that Derrick Rose is only playing well in nationally televised games?
3) Told Nick Friedell that Pau Gasol is the worst defender he has ever seen?
4) Told Haugh that Jimmy Butler plays too much ISO.
That doesn't make him any better than he is today as a coach.
The Jimmy method of strong-arming Fred through the media is NOT going to work. Because Fred is already a strong personality with his own basketball chops in coaching, player management and as a player himself. That was my point about "paying dues". This isn't a battle between unequals. Fred can stand up for himself quite nicely - and that's without Gar or Pax even stepping in.
Yes he is new to the NBA coaching and new to the Chicago Bulls. But so was Jimmy 5 seasons ago. Everyone has growing pains and learning curves.
Imagine if Fred told the media that "Pau needs to listen to the coaches more" OR "Jimmy needs to play within the team construct".
There is no relative right or wrong here. Jimmy is ABSOLUTELY wrong here.
Even from a logic/basketball perspective - it's kind of ridiculous to use the second game played on a night after a 4 OT game and a game in which Pau was not available and everyone else pretty much stunk ( including Jimmy) - it makes like ZERO sense for Jimmy to use that night as the time for laying the gauntlet at Fred.
And the place for it was also ABSOLUTELY wrong. It's NEVER in front of a microphone. You do that if you are getting poor advise OR if you are frustrated and do not have the capacity to regulate yourself emotionally.
If it's the latter, then Jimmy is a terrible leader of men.
For love, not money.