ImageImage

Raiders lead-up

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

raysbookclub
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,791
And1: 1,273
Joined: Jan 26, 2008
     

Re: Raiders lead-up 

Post#61 » by raysbookclub » Sat Dec 19, 2015 1:36 am

Montgomery's ankle must be a letdown for the team. Would have put him on IR a while ago if they didn't think he'd be able to make a decent contribution. Only three games left, but still playoffs left, so maybe it would be worth it to keep him on the roster in the hopes he'll be back for at least a game in the regular season and the playoffs. Prob though is how to make room for Quarless.
HKPackFan
RealGM
Posts: 15,528
And1: 10,868
Joined: Jan 14, 2014
Location: Hong Kong
   

Re: Raiders lead-up 

Post#62 » by HKPackFan » Sat Dec 19, 2015 12:13 pm

Davante sounds gimpy too.

Time for Janis and abby to show what they can do
#FreeChuckDiesel
jazzfanWA
Jazz Forum GTS Champion 2018-2019
Posts: 1,542
And1: 362
Joined: Oct 28, 2013

Re: Raiders lead-up 

Post#63 » by jazzfanWA » Sat Dec 19, 2015 5:07 pm

That first round bye would be huge for this banged up Packer team.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,145
And1: 55,672
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Raiders lead-up 

Post#64 » by MickeyDavis » Sun Dec 20, 2015 1:56 pm

The Green Bay Packers conducted their Saturday morning practice at Stanford University and afterward upgraded three players from questionable to probable.

Wide receiver Davante Adams (foot), guard T.J. Lang (shoulder/ankle) and defensive end Mike Daniels (hamstring) are now all but assured of playing Sunday against the Oakland Raiders. The only questionable player who was not upgraded was center Corey Linsley (ankle), who did not play last week against Dallas.

Cornerback Sam Shields (concussion) and wide receiver Ty Montgomery (ankle) did not have their status changed and are both out.

The Packers did not announce that tight end Andrew Quarless had been activated, which means it's pretty unlikely they will move him from injured reserve / designated to return to the 53-man roster. They would have to either put someone on injured reserve or cut someone who had made the trip to the West Coast.

Quarless has been practicing for the past three weeks.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
JackSIKMA43
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,430
And1: 847
Joined: Dec 13, 2011
Location: Itasca, IL
     

Re: Raiders lead-up 

Post#65 » by JackSIKMA43 » Sun Dec 20, 2015 3:19 pm

I practically forgot that Quarless is still even on this team. :roll:
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,977
And1: 1,441
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: Raiders lead-up 

Post#66 » by WiscoKing13 » Sun Dec 20, 2015 3:21 pm

So GBPG just wrote an article on how Rodgers has some absurd streak without throwing a pick six. I'm going to guess Woodson takes one back today.
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
User avatar
Turk Nowitzki
RealGM
Posts: 34,459
And1: 11,475
Joined: Feb 26, 2010
Location: on the Hellmouth
     

Re: Raiders lead-up 

Post#67 » by Turk Nowitzki » Sun Dec 20, 2015 4:45 pm

Mostly excited to see Woodson play again. I honestly thought that after we let him go Oakland gave him a pity deal so he could play one more year for his old team that wasn't going anywhere, and then retire. No way anyone expected this.
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,977
And1: 1,441
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: Raiders lead-up 

Post#68 » by WiscoKing13 » Sun Dec 20, 2015 5:53 pm

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=espn:14404735

Nice background story on james jones.
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
jimmybones
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,692
And1: 3,187
Joined: May 29, 2009
Location: MKE
     

Re: Raiders lead-up 

Post#69 » by jimmybones » Sun Dec 20, 2015 6:55 pm

crkone wrote:
Mags FTW wrote:Don't you have to fault the training staff/doctors at some point?



:blank: You can only really RICE here. It's how the injured person rehabs it when he's not with the doctors and how the ankle responds to treatment.


This. There's only so much rehab that can be done to rehab a strain.
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 8,949
And1: 5,003
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: RE: Re: Raiders lead-up 

Post#70 » by RRyder823 » Sun Dec 20, 2015 7:16 pm

jimmybones wrote:
crkone wrote:
Mags FTW wrote:Don't you have to fault the training staff/doctors at some point?



:blank: You can only really RICE here. It's how the injured person rehabs it when he's not with the doctors and how the ankle responds to treatment.


This. There's only so much rehab that can be done to rehab a strain.


I'm more suprised that ive heard from so many fans that they're suprised he's been out this long.

We should all know by now a high ankle sprain is much worse then a broken bone when it comes to getting back on the football field
User avatar
DanoMac
RealGM
Posts: 10,036
And1: 4,137
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
     

Re: Raiders lead-up 

Post#71 » by DanoMac » Sun Dec 20, 2015 7:21 pm

http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/off-field-decisions-prime-packers-for-strong-finish-b99636325z1-363053691.html

It's truly pathetic that the Rodgers hate still exists in 2015. Some of these people on Twitter are clueless.
Profound23
RealGM
Posts: 20,548
And1: 8,292
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
     

Re: Raiders lead-up 

Post#72 » by Profound23 » Mon Dec 21, 2015 1:03 am

Profound23 wrote:What are the odds Woodson gets an INT, fumble recovery, or forced fumble?

Not sure if you guys are paying attention but he is playing at a very high level. Every game I see him make at least one big play when it matters most.



You could have almost guaranteed one of these things was going to happen. Perfect to watch him make a couple of big plays and we still win.
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,977
And1: 1,441
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: Raiders lead-up 

Post#73 » by WiscoKing13 » Mon Dec 21, 2015 1:12 am

Profound23 wrote:
Profound23 wrote:What are the odds Woodson gets an INT, fumble recovery, or forced fumble?

Not sure if you guys are paying attention but he is playing at a very high level. Every game I see him make at least one big play when it matters most.



You could have almost guaranteed one of these things was going to happen. Perfect to watch him make a couple of big plays and we still win.

According to the announcers, woodson had a FF. There was a lot of eye rolls in that 5 minutes of commentary.
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.

Return to Green Bay Packers