
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=1420012#start_here
I'm not gonna lie, most of them actually make good points too.
Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez
RunDogGun wrote:Fischella wrote:The thing is, if the Lakers pick end up been a top5 pick this season or a top5-10 next year, is it worth it the difference between Thomas and Knight (plus Cleveland's pick), because that is the big failure there.
It would all depend on who that pick ended up being. Could be a Thabett. This board has been crying "Tank for _____" for the last four years. Each of those years we could have drafted that somebody with our normal pick. It started with Perry Jones, then Shabazz, then Noel. The draft is a crapshoot. And then it also depends on who is picked with the Cleveland pick. Later picks turn out well at times like Jimmy Buttler. I agree that a higher pick with a GM like McD should yield a better player, but Len was a top five pick, and he is just as inconsistent as anyone on our team. So what I'm saying is it will take a while to judge that trade, and we can't make that judgement just by where the picks end up in number.
AtheJ415 wrote:toucansma wrote:Bogyo wrote:I have soured on McD since the last offseason. Initially I loved when he got the job, as he had a very solid background, was speaking very well, etc... But this asset hoarding mentality along with the 2 pg crap has gotten out of hand a bit, and so far I do not see evidence that he is learning (learned) from these situations.
We can look at each case differently, and make up excuses for him - and some of those are really legit - but if there is so much turmoil and bad remarks from players/previous players towards the management it just reeks bad business after a while. Where there is smoke there is fire...
I think he has one-two more seasons, depending on the outcome of this Kief situation, the development of our team (especially the young guys-his draft picks), and the "outcome" of some previous trades (hello lakers pick).
If we don't take steps forward in a season or two, or we'll have another case like Dragic/IT/Morri/Frye/Bledsoe, then I will want him gone asap.
His 2 PG "wish" might be just based on what he sees talent wise around the league. Right now there are more good to very good PGs than SGs. Players that may been that 2-3 in the past, now seem to gravitate towards 3-4(stretch) in systems. So if more talented SGs come into the league he might not be as big on the concept in the future.
I just don't understand why people call Knight a PG at this point. He's not. He's a 2 guard through and through. When we are healthy, he plays very little PG. Bledsoe is our PG.
toucansma wrote:AtheJ415 wrote:toucansma wrote:
His 2 PG "wish" might be just based on what he sees talent wise around the league. Right now there are more good to very good PGs than SGs. Players that may been that 2-3 in the past, now seem to gravitate towards 3-4(stretch) in systems. So if more talented SGs come into the league he might not be as big on the concept in the future.
I just don't understand why people call Knight a PG at this point. He's not. He's a 2 guard through and through. When we are healthy, he plays very little PG. Bledsoe is our PG.
He should be an SG, but he has been a PG in that he was often initiating the offense even with Bled out there. The problem is Bled's setup skills are not great either, so they have been rotating between each other as the initiator. Neither have done a superb job with that aspect.
bwgood77 wrote:alldayeveryday wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
Every time I think about that I have to watch the video. That just makes me laugh.
That is what upsets me so much. Do you think we went after Chandler because of $arver?
(Since he wants to get into the playoffs = more $$$ to fill his pockets because the money purse that comes with getting into the show)
For sure. I also am not entirely sure we trade the pick for Knight if Sarver didn't say something like "we don't need THAT many young guys and picks! We need players who can play now!" At least he isn't selling our own picks any more.
Frank Lee wrote:bwgood77 wrote:alldayeveryday wrote:
That is what upsets me so much. Do you think we went after Chandler because of $arver?
(Since he wants to get into the playoffs = more $$$ to fill his pockets because the money purse that comes with getting into the show)
For sure. I also am not entirely sure we trade the pick for Knight if Sarver didn't say something like "we don't need THAT many young guys and picks! We need players who can play now!" At least he isn't selling our own picks any more.
jeezus.... this is the biggest crawl up McDuh's rump and wiggle blame deflection I've seen to date. You have out done yourself. No one can touch your 'hampstering' talents. You really believe things like this?
Bad enough to get the smug know it all, condescending rebuttals, and futuristic reassurances, whenever anyone questions the direction of the team. (Hats off to the torch carrierswho haven't given in to the rosy glassers). King Midas McDuh knows what he is doing. Or does he? He has drafted 3 guys that appear to have a future with us... two have been dubbed All Stars already, and our dominate big man got demoted by an old man. But thats apparently on Sarver too. Just so we could get a sister kiss chasing LMA. That almosts feel good. (but please, stop the Bogdan praise/penciled in starter. He's the new hopethrob of the Goodwhiners)
From what I have seen.. McDuh has done OK drafting... and we do have a few extra late picks... our best one, aside from the one we are cruising towards, doesn't drop till 2021.... thats uh... 5 yrs from nowMc has made one really good trade, some so so-ers, and a couple of WTFs. But he has poorly managed the personnel here and screwed the pooch in free agency. Certainly there is a question with his coach selection, as well as this love affair with multiple combo guards.
Frankly, all his efforts over the past three years, puts us almost back on page one. He's all in with Knight, and for his and our sake, we'd better hope the 2 of the three draftees come through. And Bled ??? you really think he will re-up with us. I don't see it.
King Midas? More like Prince Pyrite to me. He has a lot of unfinished work to do.
So Yeah... I am still around, still eyeball games and this site. Was holding off till the new year and hopefully a roster shuffle, but the
nutless wonders in the FO can't even muster up enough balljuice to tell Morris to stay home till further notice. Pathetic. My guess, very few GMs would tolerate MoBro being around to sour the troops. Might be why he is still here. Oh well... I don't know what to expect anymore, especially after hearing a few of McDuh's BS pressers. Carry on Bgwood... I'll be watching.
1UPZ wrote:I truely believe McD is being pressured by Suns ownership and board group to make the playoffs.
1UPZ wrote:The Dragic trade was good....
Frank Lee wrote:I don't think he is as involved as many believe. But I think the front office as a whole is sucking wind right now. This was a bad off season that followed a mediocre one. Things are not working out like they envisioned on paper.
I have little to no interest except in our Wee Three.
G35 wrote:He may run a great offense but I wouldn't choose him over Amare to start a team.
Sun Scorched wrote:I thought this past off-season was solid. Had we landed LMA, this probably wouldn't even be a thread. The fact that we had a legitimate shot at LaMarcus was huge and, in my opinion, a testament to McD.
LaMarcus would have been our biggest free agent signing since Nash. Let that sink in. And we were *this* close.
1UPZ wrote:Dragic at 17 million dollars a year for 4-5 years is TERRIBLE for the Suns.
If the Suns already had a COMPLETE team to run for the playoffs... SURE... bank away.
Had Dragic been 3-4 years younger... SURE, bank away also.
But Signing Dragic to a HUGE contract when the team was under cleanup mode... was a RISKY move and to get 2 picks from him after HE came out to the media and demanded a trade. F^&k that guy. Had he kept everything under wraps, the Suns could of gotten more.
I agree... about the Lakers pick... I agree about the Knight trade that also traded away Thomas, who is outplaying Knight at 50% the cost. I agree with those things Frank. But I dont agree with the Dragic thing. Dragic forced the FO to sell low because he wanted out ASAP because he was sooking about his stats dropping.