Neddy wrote:great news! but wrong forum brother.
Whoops! That's what I get for posting 1st thing once out of bed this lazy Saturday afternoon.

 
                    
                    
                    
                                      
               Neddy wrote:great news! but wrong forum brother.

 _IGNORED: Max Headrom-esqtvd-QRich3-EBledsoe12-alon8882-45clip
 _IGNORED: Max Headrom-esqtvd-QRich3-EBledsoe12-alon8882-45clip 
                    
                    
                    
                                      
                _IGNORED: Max Headrom-esqtvd-QRich3-EBledsoe12-alon8882-45clip
 _IGNORED: Max Headrom-esqtvd-QRich3-EBledsoe12-alon8882-45clip 
                                                                          
                                  Neddy wrote:DieHardFan wrote:Pekovic is the least player doc would show any interest. Besides the huge salary, he's slower than Hawes, awful shooter, would be very bad in the new defensive scheme and probably worst athlete in the league by far. Only strong play he has is the half-efficent post play which is a huge ball stopper gap in today's basketball. He is gonna be out of the league as soon as his contract finishes.
Pek is a nice player, but yeah I don't see him fit our system. hell the guys we have right now doesn't seem to fit the system and those guys were specifically signed because of Doc's system.
which brings me to the actual problem we all have known now... is Doc the GM worse than Doc the talent evaluator or visa versa? on paper Josh looks like a good small ball center, but didn't work out. Hawes looked like a good spacer on the floor, but didn't work out. gave away a first to get rid of Jered that was a piece of the bigger puzzle that obviously ended up lessening our return for Bledsoe trade, I mean, hindsight is always 20/20 but doesn't it seem like Doc doesn't really know what type of players actually fits his system? or his system just a result of his assistants at that time a la Mark Jackson? I do think Doc is a good play calling coach out of time outs so he is at least better than Jackson, but way too many misses than hits for my taste. I miss coaches who can alter their systems to maximize the talent they are given.
 
                    
                    
                                                                      
 
                                                                                                          
 
                                                                                                          
 
                                                                                                           
                    
                    
                                                        
               
 
                                                                                                           
                    
                    
                                      
                    
               
 
                                                                                                          
 
                                                                                                           
                    
                    
                                                                      
 
                                                                                                           
                    
                    
                    
                                      
               Other than that, why should the Nets let him go for nothing? Brooklyn is still better with Johnson on the floor, and it's not like he's blocking much young talent from playing. Without a pick for the upcoming draft, the Nets have no incentive to tank, not even for a second-rounder, given that the Clippers will almost certainly capitalize on a second-round pick swap with them this June.
Still, a buyout is comprehensible if only for the reasons above, and if it does happen, certainly keep an eye on those Clippers, who love to sign veteran buyout candidates come late February and early March.
 _IGNORED: Max Headrom-esqtvd-QRich3-EBledsoe12-alon8882-45clip
 _IGNORED: Max Headrom-esqtvd-QRich3-EBledsoe12-alon8882-45clip
 
                                                                                                          og15 wrote:Robert Covington is another option. I know his shooting numbers are down, but considering the team he's playing for, I'd say that if he was getting his shots from CP and Blake his percentages would be better. Big, long SF, very active hands, active on the glass. I'm worried about what causes him to turn the ball over so much though. Maybe in a system where he's handling less, that changes, but I don't know, right now he's awful with that.
Hard to get him without a pick, so the best idea would be to take on Landry's contract, and send a 2nd to Philly along with someone like Jamal and Wilcox, or I suppose Lance is another option here.
Clippers get to keep their second round pick if it is in the top 55, and secondly have the option to swap picks with the Nets as long as it is in the top 55. So with GSW, SAS and OKC ahead of the Clippers, and likely CLE, the Clippers will most likely be in the top 55 and can swap picks with the Nets which will give an early 2nd round pick.
Covington is signed at $1 million / year for 2 more seasons

Return to Los Angeles Clippers