ATL: Week 17
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Re: ATL: Week 17
- BigDee
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,175
- And1: 1,381
- Joined: Jul 11, 2006
- Location: Wisconsin
-
Re: ATL: Week 17
Farewell Woodson!
Re: ATL: Week 17
- rilamann
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,669
- And1: 15,197
- Joined: Jun 20, 2003
- Location: Damn that rilamann!!
-
Re: ATL: Week 17
The Chiefs sure fell apart after Jamal Charles got hurt....lol.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
Re: ATL: Week 17
- Ron Swanson
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,510
- And1: 29,332
- Joined: May 15, 2013
Re: ATL: Week 17
rilamann wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:Seattle looks pretty good, but they're just 10x more motivated to win this game than the Cardinals are. Let's not forget that they laid an egg last week against the Rams at home. I just don't buy that they're this "awaking juggernaut" that we should all cower in fear of.
They're not the same team as they were in years past. A good secondary can still shut down that so-so WR corps like we did earlier this season and in the NFC championship last year.
Yeah,the cardinals only had a shot at the #1 seed going into this game.
Except that Carolina was destroying the Buccaneers at the time so they had no incentive after the 1st quarter. Or do you honestly think they gave the Seahawks their best effort?
Re: ATL: Week 17
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,976
- And1: 1,441
- Joined: Jan 03, 2009
-
Re: ATL: Week 17
Ron Swanson wrote:rilamann wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:Seattle looks pretty good, but they're just 10x more motivated to win this game than the Cardinals are. Let's not forget that they laid an egg last week against the Rams at home. I just don't buy that they're this "awaking juggernaut" that we should all cower in fear of.
They're not the same team as they were in years past. A good secondary can still shut down that so-so WR corps like we did earlier this season and in the NFC championship last year.
Yeah,the cardinals only had a shot at the #1 seed going into this game.
Except that Carolina was destroying the Buccaneers at the time so they had no incentive after the 1st quarter. Or do you honestly think they gave the Seahawks their best effort?
You're playing a divisional foe for the 1 seed, of course they are. Also if AZ were giving up in the second quarter they wouldn't of waited till the 3rd to bench palmer.
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.