Game 37: Phoenix Suns (12-24) @ Los Angeles Lakers (7-27)

Calvin Klein · Post #361 » by **Calvin Klein** » Mon Jan 4, 2016 4:41 am

maybe the strangest game i've even watched.

RaisingArizona · Post #362 » by **RaisingArizona** » Mon Jan 4, 2016 4:42 am

Tucker and Chandler with -33 and -30, respectively.

saintEscaton · Post #363 » by **saintEscaton** » Mon Jan 4, 2016 4:42 am

Calvin Klein wrote:maybe the strangest game i've even watched.

It was surreal. Kafkaesque you could say...

Cutter · Post #364 » by **Cutter** » Mon Jan 4, 2016 4:43 am

ginobiliflops wrote:Tucker and Chandler with -33 and -30, respectively.

Booker was -30 as well.

SunsRback4Good · Post #365 » by **SunsRback4Good** » Mon Jan 4, 2016 4:44 am

Hornacek fired tomorrow morning. Tucker & Price shed tears knowing their playing time will be reduced to 3 min per game.

AtheJ415 · Post #366 » by **AtheJ415** » Mon Jan 4, 2016 4:45 am

kennydorglas wrote:21 min for TJ
20 min for Booker

this is not good, Hornacek.

With an inability to get TJ going at all as our primary scorer now that Bledsoe's down. Although he also decided to bench said primary scorer. So there's that too. But hey, Jeff's a great guy. And PJ and Ronnie hustle. That's what really matters. I hope they give participation trophies for our hustling go getters.

Mr Puddles · Post #367 » by **Mr Puddles** » Mon Jan 4, 2016 4:45 am

Who would have thought taking our 22 year old SF, who as a starter over the last two games averaged 24 ppg/7 rebounds on 56% shooting, out of the starting line-up would be a bad idea? mind boggling.

Jdiddy701 · Post #368 » by **Jdiddy701** » Mon Jan 4, 2016 4:45 am

I don't think we talk about the Suns losing Bledsoe enough. I actually didn't think he would be missed by that much. He's important but damn he's our whole team.

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

saintEscaton · Post #369 » by **saintEscaton** » Mon Jan 4, 2016 4:46 am

This was all according to the plan Stan. Playing those pinballs just right

Cutter · Post #370 » by **Cutter** » Mon Jan 4, 2016 4:47 am

We are definitely a worse team than the Lakers, and I am confident we are now worse than the 76'ers. This team is the worst team in the NBA even though our record may not show it. There are enough games remaining that the Lakers can catch us, I'm not sure the Sixers will catch us though.

Mulhollanddrive · Post #371 » by **Mulhollanddrive** » Mon Jan 4, 2016 4:47 am

Philadelphia have a 45% chance of getting the Lakers pick at pick 4 or 5.

We could have 2 top 5 picks this draft.

kennydorglas · Post #372 » by **kennydorglas** » Mon Jan 4, 2016 4:47 am

half game in front of Brooklyn for the #3 seed
we're almost there, guys

RaisingArizona · Post #373 » by **RaisingArizona** » Mon Jan 4, 2016 4:47 am

Cutter wrote:
ginobiliflops wrote:Tucker and Chandler with -33 and -30, respectively.

Booker was -30 as well.

He gets a pass as a 19 year old rookie.

Post #374 » by **bwgood77** » Mon Jan 4, 2016 4:47 am

Hornacek probably has to go now, but I'm guessing if he does, McD will go shortly thereafter. Sarver will want to scrap it all and start over once again.

letsgosuns · Post #375 » by **letsgosuns** » Mon Jan 4, 2016 4:48 am

Tom Chambers really bashing Knight. Said Knight did nothing for the Suns when it mattered and got all his shots during garbage time. It is the complete truth.

saintEscaton · Post #376 » by **saintEscaton** » Mon Jan 4, 2016 4:48 am

Mulhollanddrive wrote:Philadelphia have a 45% chance of getting the Lakers pick at pick 4 or 5.

We could have 2 top 5 picks this draft.

Stop reminding me! Oh what could have been! But the Knightmare will never cease to torment us.

DirtyDez · Post #377 » by **DirtyDez** » Mon Jan 4, 2016 4:48 am

Do we really want Horny fired? Sometimes teams go on nice little runs after a coaching change. Can't be having that.

Post #378 » by **bwgood77** » Mon Jan 4, 2016 4:49 am

Mulhollanddrive wrote:Philadelphia have a 45% chance of getting the Lakers pick at pick 4 or 5.

We could have 2 top 5 picks this draft.

Yeah, except that without Knight we might have been better to escape bottom 5 status.

kennydorglas · Post #379 » by **kennydorglas** » Mon Jan 4, 2016 4:49 am

But u guys know Lakers will never lose this pick... odds really doesnt matter here.

saintEscaton · Post #380 » by **saintEscaton** » Mon Jan 4, 2016 4:50 am

bwgood77 wrote:Hornacek probably has to go now, but I'm guessing if he does, McD will go shortly thereafter. Sarver will want to scrap it all and start over once again.

I feel like once we get rid of Horny who has been the convenient scapegoat all scrutinous eyes will be cast upon the FO so they may try to forestall his deperature to save their own hide.