Sweater Vest Thread #20: Magic 83 - Nets 77
Moderators: ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass
Re: Sweater Vest Thread #20: Magic 83 - Nets 77
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,435
- And1: 3,679
- Joined: May 23, 2013
Re: Sweater Vest Thread #20: Magic 83 - Nets 77
- OrlandO
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,634
- And1: 16,421
- Joined: May 27, 2009
Re: Sweater Vest Thread #20: Magic 83 - Nets 77
Too much talk about a guy averaging 11 pts on 36% fg this season and who didn't do much better against us (Joe Johnson).
Re: Sweater Vest Thread #20: Magic 83 - Nets 77
- j_n
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,834
- And1: 1,693
- Joined: Mar 19, 2010
-
Re: Sweater Vest Thread #20: Magic 83 - Nets 77
mojosodope wrote:Bored, so I will go ahead and take this bait, mostly because I think you are betting on the fact that no one will actually watch your clips and take your word for your description of the plays.
I won't even get into your decision to omit the missed FGA's, according to you Harris was just lucky JJ missed.
I didnt mention the made ones either, defense is determined by how hard you made it on your opponent, not if he made it or not, you can miss open shots and make contested ones, over time it will be balanced.
I guess we will agree to disagree on the way you analyzed some of the plays but even with your analysis he was far from playing good defense on JJ.
Re: Sweater Vest Thread #20: Magic 83 - Nets 77
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,739
- And1: 459
- Joined: Apr 29, 2011
-
Re: Sweater Vest Thread #20: Magic 83 - Nets 77
j_n wrote:mojosodope wrote:Bored, so I will go ahead and take this bait, mostly because I think you are betting on the fact that no one will actually watch your clips and take your word for your description of the plays.
I won't even get into your decision to omit the missed FGA's, according to you Harris was just lucky JJ missed.
I didnt mention the made ones either, defense is determined by how hard you made it on your opponent, not if he made it or not, you can miss open shots and make contested ones, over time it will be balanced.
I guess we will agree to disagree on the way you analyzed some of the plays but even with your analysis he was far from playing good defense on JJ.
No, but while having a TERRIBLE shooting night, still nearly having a triple double, and leading the team in +/-, what we will agree to disagree on is:
j_n wrote:Harris as a complete negative all night.