ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread - Part XXX

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

thricethefun
Junior
Posts: 340
And1: 46
Joined: Feb 15, 2013

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#501 » by thricethefun » Tue Jan 19, 2016 2:16 am

The Cavs don't use Kevin Love correctly. His skillset overlaps with Lebron and Kyrie. Trade Beal and Gortat for Love then sign Whiteside this offseason. Wall Bazemore Otto Love Whiteside
User avatar
long suffrin' boulez fan
General Manager
Posts: 7,894
And1: 3,665
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Just above Ted's double bottom line
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#502 » by long suffrin' boulez fan » Tue Jan 19, 2016 2:19 am

thricethefun wrote:The Cavs don't use Kevin Love correctly. His skillset overlaps with Lebron and Kyrie. Trade Beal and Gortat for Love then sign Whiteside this offseason. Wall Bazemore Otto Love Whiteside


At this point, that's a lot to give up for Love.

...and I would do anything for Love.

But I won't do that.
In Rizzo we trust
thricethefun
Junior
Posts: 340
And1: 46
Joined: Feb 15, 2013

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#503 » by thricethefun » Tue Jan 19, 2016 2:23 am

long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
thricethefun wrote:The Cavs don't use Kevin Love correctly. His skillset overlaps with Lebron and Kyrie. Trade Beal and Gortat for Love then sign Whiteside this offseason. Wall Bazemore Otto Love Whiteside


At this point, that's a lot to give up for Love.

...and I would do anything for Love.

But I won't do that.


I think if we give him a big role in the offense like he could have here he could go back to playing like the Minnesota Love instead of the glorified spot up shooter that he's become.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,907
And1: 9,253
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#504 » by payitforward » Tue Jan 19, 2016 2:49 am

wolves_89 wrote:
payitforward wrote:
wolves_89 wrote:The same can be said for Blair. Out of Payne or Blair I'd rather have Payne.

I'm don't know whether either of these guys is among the league's worst players, but at least Blair has had a history of success in the NBA. And, he has an actual role.

In short, you're wrong.

I'm not sure how wanting the younger player with more upside is wrong for a rebuilding team. Saying that Blair was once a useful player has little to do with his current value. Could Blair return to usefulness, it's possible, but when the bet is a long shot either way I'll go with the option that is more oriented to the future instead of the past.

In principle, I agree 100%. But... the thing is... we're not talking about principles here, we're talking about 2 particular players.

Payne is about to turn 25. He's never been any good, and he hasn't gotten better either; he hasn't gone from bad to less bad. There's just no reason whatever to place even a small bet on him.

Oh, and Dejuan Blair is less than 2 years older than Payne. I'd say it's *a lot* more likely he contributes this year and next than that Payne does.

Keep in mind, I'm not trying to build a statue of Dejuan Blair in the park! Just saying that he's a better bet than Adreian Payne! You want to give me Dieng for Blair? You got a deal. I'll throw in Kris Humphries and Gary Neal. :)
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#505 » by fishercob » Tue Jan 19, 2016 3:03 am

Bradley Beal and Nene for Kevin Love right the eff now. Cleveland is apt to make a panic trade seeing as they can't beat GSW.
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,907
And1: 9,253
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#506 » by payitforward » Tue Jan 19, 2016 3:10 am

fishercob wrote:Bradley Beal and Nene for Kevin Love right the eff now. Cleveland is apt to make a panic trade seeing as they can't beat GSW.

It's like John said so long ago...

"There's nothing you can do that can't be done
Nothing you can sing that can't be sung
Nothing you can say but you can learn how to play the game
It's easy"
nuposse04
RealGM
Posts: 11,315
And1: 2,471
Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Location: on a rock
   

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#507 » by nuposse04 » Tue Jan 19, 2016 3:26 am

fishercob wrote:Bradley Beal and Nene for Kevin Love right the eff now. Cleveland is apt to make a panic trade seeing as they can't beat GSW.




Would be hilarious to watch him **** up on defense 3-5 times a game. Cle prolly says no though.

I think CLE should consider something like Love for T. Jones and Capella to HOU.

They really effed themselves IMO by giving TT that contract.
deneem4
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,917
And1: 1,263
Joined: Dec 26, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#508 » by deneem4 » Tue Jan 19, 2016 3:36 am

fishercob wrote:Bradley Beal and Nene for Kevin Love right the eff now. Cleveland is apt to make a panic trade seeing as they can't beat GSW.


As much as I love will help us...beal would help them more...playoff beal next to Lebron and kyrie is unfair not to mention giving the cavs a smart big man in nene
Pay your beals....or its lights out!!!
Bron, Bosh, Wade is like Mike, Hakeem, barkley...3 top 5 picks from same draft
mike, hakeem and Barkley on the same team!!!!
wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,163
And1: 4,652
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#509 » by wolves_89 » Tue Jan 19, 2016 4:28 am

payitforward wrote:
wolves_89 wrote:
payitforward wrote:I'm don't know whether either of these guys is among the league's worst players, but at least Blair has had a history of success in the NBA. And, he has an actual role.

In short, you're wrong.

I'm not sure how wanting the younger player with more upside is wrong for a rebuilding team. Saying that Blair was once a useful player has little to do with his current value. Could Blair return to usefulness, it's possible, but when the bet is a long shot either way I'll go with the option that is more oriented to the future instead of the past.

In principle, I agree 100%. But... the thing is... we're not talking about principles here, we're talking about 2 particular players.

Payne is about to turn 25. He's never been any good, and he hasn't gotten better either; he hasn't gone from bad to less bad. There's just no reason whatever to place even a small bet on him.

Oh, and Dejuan Blair is less than 2 years older than Payne. I'd say it's *a lot* more likely he contributes this year and next than that Payne does.

Keep in mind, I'm not trying to build a statue of Dejuan Blair in the park! Just saying that he's a better bet than Adreian Payne! You want to give me Dieng for Blair? You got a deal. I'll throw in Kris Humphries and Gary Neal. :)


I can see your argument, I just don't agree with it. I don't see Blair as having any use at this point and while Payne isn't currently any better, I'll still take his athletic ability and slight potential to develop over Blair any day. It's not like Blair is in a month long slump, it's going on a season and a half of being completely terrible so hoping for a return to the production he once had seems far fetched to me.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,493
And1: 2,143
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#510 » by Dark Faze » Tue Jan 19, 2016 2:19 pm

If I had to choose between the two I'd go Payne for those reasons. Don't want either though.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,907
And1: 9,253
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#511 » by payitforward » Tue Jan 19, 2016 3:33 pm

Ok, fine.... Not much at stake here. :)
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 20,826
And1: 5,349
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#512 » by tontoz » Tue Jan 19, 2016 3:37 pm

long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
thricethefun wrote:The Cavs don't use Kevin Love correctly. His skillset overlaps with Lebron and Kyrie. Trade Beal and Gortat for Love then sign Whiteside this offseason. Wall Bazemore Otto Love Whiteside


At this point, that's a lot to give up for Love.

...and I would do anything for Love.

But I won't do that.



Am I the only one that got the Meatloaf reference? :lol:
Thank God we didn't draft the Fat Matador.

"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
LyricalRico
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 30,567
And1: 854
Joined: May 23, 2002
Location: Back into the fray!
Contact:
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#513 » by LyricalRico » Tue Jan 19, 2016 4:48 pm

fishercob wrote:Bradley Beal and Nene for Kevin Love right the eff now. Cleveland is apt to make a panic trade seeing as they can't beat GSW.


I don't see that helping Cleveland at all. They give up the best player in the deal, and it doesn't change any of their roster dynamics to help them matchup better with teams like GS that go small.

thricethefun wrote:The Cavs don't use Kevin Love correctly. His skillset overlaps with Lebron and Kyrie. Trade Beal and Gortat for Love then sign Whiteside this offseason. Wall Bazemore Otto Love Whiteside


Not feeling the Whiteside part of the scenario, but the first half might be an interesting offseason sign-and-trade if the Cavs don't win a title this year and want to shake things up. Gortat gives them similar size/production to Mosgov but at a more controlled cost (who know what kind of deal Mosgov will get this summer). And maybe they'd want a future first as insurance for Beal's leg, which I'd be fine with.

Acquring Love and signing Durant would give us all the star power we'd need. Oubre steps in at SG, and we can move Otto for a serviceable center. Maybe something like Otto+Blair for Noah (assuming he's healthy)?

Noah/2016 first
Love/Hump
Durant/FA
Oubre/Temple
Wall/Sato
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,647
And1: 23,139
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#514 » by nate33 » Tue Jan 19, 2016 4:58 pm

LyricalRico wrote:
fishercob wrote:Bradley Beal and Nene for Kevin Love right the eff now. Cleveland is apt to make a panic trade seeing as they can't beat GSW.


I don't see that helping Cleveland at all. They give up the best player in the deal, and it doesn't change any of their roster dynamics to help them matchup better with teams like GS that go small.

?

Beal is a quality SG with upside and a history of performing well in the playoffs. With him on the roster, they can play Lebron at the 4 a lot more because Beal, Smith and Shumpert can handle the rotation at SG and SF.

All that said, I'm not sure how enthusiastic I am about trading for Love. With his $21M contract on the books, we wouldn't have much depth if we also went after Durant. There is no backup PF, no backup C, no backup PG and no money for them. I suppose it could work if we knew we weren't getting Durant. Then we'd use the Durant money on a guy like Biyombo.

I guess I'm saying that If KD2DC is still in play, I'd much prefer a low cost option at PF like Portis or maybe Markieff. If KD2DC is out the window, then maybe Love makes sense.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#515 » by Ruzious » Tue Jan 19, 2016 5:14 pm

nate33 wrote:
LyricalRico wrote:
fishercob wrote:Bradley Beal and Nene for Kevin Love right the eff now. Cleveland is apt to make a panic trade seeing as they can't beat GSW.


I don't see that helping Cleveland at all. They give up the best player in the deal, and it doesn't change any of their roster dynamics to help them matchup better with teams like GS that go small.

?

Beal is a quality SG with upside and a history of performing well in the playoffs. With him on the roster, they can play Lebron at the 4 a lot more because Beal, Smith and Shumpert can handle the rotation at SG and SF.

All that said, I'm not sure how enthusiastic I am about trading for Love. With his $21M contract on the books, we wouldn't have much depth if we also went after Durant. There is no backup PF, no backup C, no backup PG and no money for them. I suppose it could work if we knew we weren't getting Durant. Then we'd use the Durant money on a guy like Biyombo.

I guess I'm saying that If KD2DC is still in play, I'd much prefer a low cost option at PF like Portis or maybe Markieff. If KD2DC is out the window, then maybe Love makes sense.

Theoretically speaking, sign and trade Beal for Love after signing Durant?
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,647
And1: 23,139
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#516 » by nate33 » Tue Jan 19, 2016 5:17 pm

Ruzious wrote:
nate33 wrote:
LyricalRico wrote:
I don't see that helping Cleveland at all. They give up the best player in the deal, and it doesn't change any of their roster dynamics to help them matchup better with teams like GS that go small.

?

Beal is a quality SG with upside and a history of performing well in the playoffs. With him on the roster, they can play Lebron at the 4 a lot more because Beal, Smith and Shumpert can handle the rotation at SG and SF.

All that said, I'm not sure how enthusiastic I am about trading for Love. With his $21M contract on the books, we wouldn't have much depth if we also went after Durant. There is no backup PF, no backup C, no backup PG and no money for them. I suppose it could work if we knew we weren't getting Durant. Then we'd use the Durant money on a guy like Biyombo.

I guess I'm saying that If KD2DC is still in play, I'd much prefer a low cost option at PF like Portis or maybe Markieff. If KD2DC is out the window, then maybe Love makes sense.

Theoretically speaking, sign and trade Beal for Love after signing Durant?

I'd have to double check, but I think they tightened the S&T rules to make this idea a no-go. They tried to stop teams from using S&T as a means of exceeding the cap. But if this is possible, then I'd be heavily in favor.
mademan
RealGM
Posts: 32,137
And1: 31,219
Joined: Feb 18, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#517 » by mademan » Tue Jan 19, 2016 5:34 pm

nate33 wrote:
LyricalRico wrote:
fishercob wrote:Bradley Beal and Nene for Kevin Love right the eff now. Cleveland is apt to make a panic trade seeing as they can't beat GSW.


I don't see that helping Cleveland at all. They give up the best player in the deal, and it doesn't change any of their roster dynamics to help them matchup better with teams like GS that go small.

?

Beal is a quality SG with upside and a history of performing well in the playoffs. With him on the roster, they can play Lebron at the 4 a lot more because Beal, Smith and Shumpert can handle the rotation at SG and SF.
.


Beal is a SG that is not (right now) a big enough upgrade over the JR/Shumpert rotation they have to justify giving up Love. He doesnt solve their defending problems, Lebron doesnt want to be a full time PF (even though he should be) and they still have a starting C issue. If Love is going out, it has to be to plug holes, not strengthen areas where they are fine (SG)
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,647
And1: 23,139
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#518 » by nate33 » Tue Jan 19, 2016 5:52 pm

mademan wrote:
nate33 wrote:
LyricalRico wrote:
I don't see that helping Cleveland at all. They give up the best player in the deal, and it doesn't change any of their roster dynamics to help them matchup better with teams like GS that go small.

?

Beal is a quality SG with upside and a history of performing well in the playoffs. With him on the roster, they can play Lebron at the 4 a lot more because Beal, Smith and Shumpert can handle the rotation at SG and SF.
.


Beal is a SG that is not (right now) a big enough upgrade over the JR/Shumpert rotation they have to justify giving up Love. He doesnt solve their defending problems, Lebron doesnt want to be a full time PF (even though he should be) and they still have a starting C issue. If Love is going out, it has to be to plug holes, not strengthen areas where they are fine (SG)

Shumpert and Smith can't play the entire game. If Lebron plays PF full time, Beal will be replacing Mo Williams and Richard Jefferson, not Shumpert and Smith. And that's a HUGE upgrade.
mademan
RealGM
Posts: 32,137
And1: 31,219
Joined: Feb 18, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#519 » by mademan » Tue Jan 19, 2016 6:02 pm

nate33 wrote:
mademan wrote:
nate33 wrote:?

Beal is a quality SG with upside and a history of performing well in the playoffs. With him on the roster, they can play Lebron at the 4 a lot more because Beal, Smith and Shumpert can handle the rotation at SG and SF.
.


Beal is a SG that is not (right now) a big enough upgrade over the JR/Shumpert rotation they have to justify giving up Love. He doesnt solve their defending problems, Lebron doesnt want to be a full time PF (even though he should be) and they still have a starting C issue. If Love is going out, it has to be to plug holes, not strengthen areas where they are fine (SG)

Shumpert and Smith can't play the entire game. If Lebron plays PF full time, Beal will be replacing Mo Williams and Richard Jefferson, not Shumpert and Smith. And that's a HUGE upgrade.


And Love, you forgot that. Does it make them more likely to win a championship this year? I dont think so. And they'll be forced to match a 20+ mill contract to one of the few players in the league more injury prone than Love. Jus sayin, Cavs are trying to win a chip right now, Beal, to me, is not the win now player the Cavs need.

Would the Cavs rather have, say, Crowder/Bradley or Beal, to win a chip right now? I'd pretty easily take the former if i was them, and thats only 1 deal. How about McCollum/Aminu? etc...
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#520 » by fishercob » Tue Jan 19, 2016 6:08 pm

mademan wrote:
nate33 wrote:
mademan wrote:
Beal is a SG that is not (right now) a big enough upgrade over the JR/Shumpert rotation they have to justify giving up Love. He doesnt solve their defending problems, Lebron doesnt want to be a full time PF (even though he should be) and they still have a starting C issue. If Love is going out, it has to be to plug holes, not strengthen areas where they are fine (SG)

Shumpert and Smith can't play the entire game. If Lebron plays PF full time, Beal will be replacing Mo Williams and Richard Jefferson, not Shumpert and Smith. And that's a HUGE upgrade.


And Love, you forgot that. Does it make them more likely to win a championship this year? I dont think so. And they'll be forced to match a 20+ mill contract to one of the few players in the league more injury prone than Love. Jus sayin, Cavs are trying to win a chip right now, Beal, to me, is not the win now player the Cavs need.

Would the Cavs rather have, say, Crowder/Bradley or Beal, to win a chip right now? I'd pretty easily take the former if i was them, and thats only 1 deal. How about McCollum/Aminu? etc...


I think that whomever the Cavs would get with Beal would be a significant help -- whether that is Dudley or Nene.

The only reasonable counter Cleveland has to Golden State's death lineup is Lebron at the 5 matching up with Draymond. Cleveland has to plan for that.

Crowder would be a great get for Cleveland.
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin

Return to Washington Wizards