ImageImageImage

Asik + Anderson + Pondexter for Baynes + Ilyasova + Meeks?

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

sfballa13
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,831
And1: 928
Joined: Jan 11, 2005

Asik + Anderson + Pondexter for Baynes + Ilyasova + Meeks? 

Post#1 » by sfballa13 » Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:23 am

Asik + Anderson + Pondexter

for

Baynes + Ilyasova + Jodie Meeks

Pelicans save 21-23M by dumping Asik and get a cheap replacement in Ilyasova at 8M for next season.

Anderson is a huge upgrade over Ilyasova and Asik needed a change of scenery. Pondexter is cheap (3M), signed for the next two year, and is shooting 38% from 3Pt this season.

Our cap space also stays the same as Asik/Pondexter would be paid the same 12M we owed to Meeks/Baynes

Reggie / Jennings - Blake
KCP / Stanley
Morris / Pondexter
Anderson / Tolliver
Drummond / Asik
DBC10
General Manager
Posts: 9,963
And1: 2,829
Joined: Jun 01, 2013
 

Re: Asik + Anderson + Pondexter for Baynes + Ilyasova + Meeks? 

Post#2 » by DBC10 » Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:25 am

Asik is incapable of playing offense. I'd really rather have Baynes which is frightening to say.

Plus Asik's contract is disgusting. I'd rather keep our shooters even though Meeks hasn't really shown anything ever since coming here.
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,267
And1: 9,758
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Asik + Anderson + Pondexter for Baynes + Ilyasova + Meeks? 

Post#3 » by tmorgan » Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:32 am

Taking on Asik is too hefty a price. That's a cap eater contract we can't afford.

The real target in this trade is Ryan Anderson, right? He's good (on one end), but he's a FA. Pondexter is a small positive asset, Asik is a huge negative, and together they're still a big negative. I'd take those three for NOTHING (if we had the space), perhaps, but I'm not giving up Baynes (neutral at worst), Ilyasova (positive asset, has an additional year over Anderson), and Meeks (neutral at worst, because he's not expensive). That's just a poor deal for us long term.
mattao313
General Manager
Posts: 9,587
And1: 4,464
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
       

Re: Asik + Anderson + Pondexter for Baynes + Ilyasova + Meeks? 

Post#4 » by mattao313 » Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:32 am

Asik is terrible not taking on that contract to pay Anderson.
Championships
User avatar
zeebneeb
RealGM
Posts: 19,492
And1: 13,022
Joined: Jun 30, 2003
Location: ANGERVILLE: Population 1
 

Re: Asik + Anderson + Pondexter for Baynes + Ilyasova + Meeks? 

Post#5 » by zeebneeb » Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:48 am

Anderson is a horrible defender and Erson is easily better then him on that end of the floor. Pass all day long. Massive upgrade my ass. I will replace Erson at the drop of a hat but not for someone even worse defensively then him.
joedumars1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,931
And1: 2,211
Joined: Jan 17, 2015
       

Re: Asik + Anderson + Pondexter for Baynes + Ilyasova + Meeks? 

Post#6 » by joedumars1 » Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:56 am

Is Anderson really better than Ersan? He takes four more shots and 1 more three per game. If you gave that to Illy they'd probably be close to the same. Anderson averages .5 more boards also plays 3-4 more minutes per game. I guarantee he doesn't take charges like Illy
Spider156
Head Coach
Posts: 6,613
And1: 1,421
Joined: Jul 25, 2010
       

Re: Asik + Anderson + Pondexter for Baynes + Ilyasova + Meeks? 

Post#7 » by Spider156 » Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:35 am

Ersan is the first guy SVG asked about coming to Detroit. He knows exactly what he gets from him. With that said, he's also coached Anderson. I don't believe he'd trade Ersan for him. He'd probably rather sign Anderson in FA and that'll likely happen considering how much money we have. I'm just worried he'll overspend for him.
Defense wins championships
hoophabit
Analyst
Posts: 3,698
And1: 1,420
Joined: Jan 19, 2002
 

Re: Asik + Anderson + Pondexter for Baynes + Ilyasova + Meeks? 

Post#8 » by hoophabit » Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:28 pm

Why? Disrupt team chemistry during the first decent season we've seen in a while? What is it about Baynes that so many people seem to dislike? He has been a pretty good back up center for the Pistons. As has been noted, if SVG really wants Anderson he can sign him in the off season as he's a UFA. Pondexter is injured and out for the remainder of the season.
DetroitSho
Head Coach
Posts: 6,857
And1: 2,460
Joined: Sep 28, 2012

Re: Asik + Anderson + Pondexter for Baynes + Ilyasova + Meeks? 

Post#9 » by DetroitSho » Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:04 pm

If Asik is our backup center we don't win last night and a whole handful of other games when Dre is getting hacked. The ft parade would just continue and we'd be helpless. There's nothing Anderson, whatever false perceived upgrade he is, would be able to do about it. Can't wait until free agency is over and he's on Sacramento or something because I'm so sick of hearing his name.
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 48,969
And1: 12,471
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: Asik + Anderson + Pondexter for Baynes + Ilyasova + Meeks? 

Post#10 » by BadMofoPimp » Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:20 pm

I would almost consider this just to remove Meeks.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
Pugz
Rookie
Posts: 1,033
And1: 168
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
Location: Detroit
Contact:
     

Re: Asik + Anderson + Pondexter for Baynes + Ilyasova + Meeks? 

Post#11 » by Pugz » Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:49 pm

zeebneeb wrote:Anderson is a horrible defender and Erson is easily better then him on that end of the floor. Pass all day long. Massive upgrade my ass. I will replace Erson at the drop of a hat but not for someone even worse defensively then him.
this and asik is quite possibly the worst offensive player in the league.
Image
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 48,969
And1: 12,471
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: Asik + Anderson + Pondexter for Baynes + Ilyasova + Meeks? 

Post#12 » by BadMofoPimp » Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:04 pm

I think New Orleans would be so happy to do this deal they would even give up a 1st to facilitate.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
Arp590
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,332
And1: 2,989
Joined: Jul 02, 2009
 

Re: Asik + Anderson + Pondexter for Baynes + Ilyasova + Meeks? 

Post#13 » by Arp590 » Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:44 pm

BadMofoPimp wrote:I would almost consider this just to remove Meeks.

Why? He's an expiring next season, not like it would be hard to move him.
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 48,969
And1: 12,471
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: Asik + Anderson + Pondexter for Baynes + Ilyasova + Meeks? 

Post#14 » by BadMofoPimp » Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:47 pm

Arp590 wrote:
BadMofoPimp wrote:I would almost consider this just to remove Meeks.

Why? He's an expiring next season, not like it would be hard to move him.


Exactly, I would prefer to have his money OFF the books this upcoming offseason.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
Arp590
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,332
And1: 2,989
Joined: Jul 02, 2009
 

Re: Asik + Anderson + Pondexter for Baynes + Ilyasova + Meeks? 

Post#15 » by Arp590 » Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:49 pm

BadMofoPimp wrote:
Arp590 wrote:
BadMofoPimp wrote:I would almost consider this just to remove Meeks.

Why? He's an expiring next season, not like it would be hard to move him.


Exactly, I would prefer to have his money OFF the books this upcoming offseason.

Well it wouldn't really do anything since we are taking on Asik's massive contract, we'd be in a worse situation salary wise.
Arp590
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,332
And1: 2,989
Joined: Jul 02, 2009
 

Re: Asik + Anderson + Pondexter for Baynes + Ilyasova + Meeks? 

Post#16 » by Arp590 » Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:49 pm

BadMofoPimp wrote:
Arp590 wrote:
BadMofoPimp wrote:I would almost consider this just to remove Meeks.

Why? He's an expiring next season, not like it would be hard to move him.


Exactly, I would prefer to have his money OFF the books this upcoming offseason.

Well it wouldn't really do anything since we are taking on Asik's massive contract.
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 48,969
And1: 12,471
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: Asik + Anderson + Pondexter for Baynes + Ilyasova + Meeks? 

Post#17 » by BadMofoPimp » Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:55 pm

Arp590 wrote:
BadMofoPimp wrote:
Arp590 wrote:Why? He's an expiring next season, not like it would be hard to move him.


Exactly, I would prefer to have his money OFF the books this upcoming offseason.

Well it wouldn't really do anything since we are taking on Asik's massive contract.


Asik makes $9 mil per. About the average for a decent Backup Center in the NBA. Baynes gets $8.

Regardless, I was half joking. I would prefer to keep Baynes, but would like to find a way to move Meeks.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
mattao313
General Manager
Posts: 9,587
And1: 4,464
Joined: Aug 29, 2014
       

Re: Asik + Anderson + Pondexter for Baynes + Ilyasova + Meeks? 

Post#18 » by mattao313 » Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:17 pm

BadMofoPimp wrote:
Arp590 wrote:
BadMofoPimp wrote:
Exactly, I would prefer to have his money OFF the books this upcoming offseason.

Well it wouldn't really do anything since we are taking on Asik's massive contract.


Asik makes $9 mil per. About the average for a decent Backup Center in the NBA. Baynes gets $8.

Regardless, I was half joking. I would prefer to keep Baynes, but would like to find a way to move Meeks.

Asik average per year is 11 per 4 year contract Baynes is 6.5 3 years, plus Baynes is better. It's not even close who is more valuable.
Championships
Pistone
Sophomore
Posts: 111
And1: 103
Joined: Jul 03, 2015
     

Re: Asik + Anderson + Pondexter for Baynes + Ilyasova + Meeks? 

Post#19 » by Pistone » Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:35 pm

sfballa13 wrote:Asik + Anderson + Pondexter

for

Baynes + Ilyasova + Jodie Meeks


:D
User avatar
Han Solo
General Manager
Posts: 9,903
And1: 7,696
Joined: Jan 07, 2011
Contact:
     

Re: Asik + Anderson + Pondexter for Baynes + Ilyasova + Meeks? 

Post#20 » by Han Solo » Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:21 am

Baynes is untouchable.. Kind of serious. haha

Return to Detroit Pistons