Slava wrote:mksp wrote:The argument that Okafor was a bad fit because the Lakers already had Randle seems flawed. I'm just not sure Randle has enough talent to warrant consideration on this front.
Even with Jahlil's horrible start to the season, he's crushing Randle in terms of advanced stats:
http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.cgi?request=1&sum=1&p1=okafoja01&p2=randlju01&p3=&p4=&p5=&p6=
So question is would you rather build around Clarkson + Okafor (moving Randle for some value) or Russell + Randle (moving Clarkson for some value).
I don't understand, why do we have to trade anyone now when they don't have much value? We would rather develop them a while longer and sell at peak value if we have to.
I guess that all depends whether you think they've actually already hit their peak value or not.
Hinkie aggressively decided the LAL 2016 pick was peak value for MCW, and we're all pretty happy with that trade, even though he's been playing a bit better lately.
It's a risk I suppose. Another two years of similar production and Randle will have very little value.
Never said it was an easy call!