ImageImageImage

Fundamental problems or growing pains?

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

Fundamental problems or growing pains?

Fundamental problems
7
28%
Growing pains
18
72%
 
Total votes: 25

User avatar
Laimbeer
RealGM
Posts: 42,963
And1: 15,115
Joined: Aug 12, 2009
Location: Cabin Creek
     

Fundamental problems or growing pains? 

Post#1 » by Laimbeer » Mon Jan 25, 2016 12:01 pm

Our young core, while talented, has some red flags. Are these growing pains or fundamental problems?

Dre - Shockingly bad free throw shooter, seems to lack concentration and effort at times.

KCP - Better than I thought, but his shot still hasn't developed enough. Selection isn't always great.

Reggie - Too ball dominant at times, inconsistent, turnovers, shot selection. Seems to try to do too much.

Stanimal - He's a kid. Too early. But I do wonder about his offensive tools at the three.
Comments to rationalize bad contracts -
1) It's less than the MLE
2) He can be traded later
3) It's only __% of the cap
4) The cap is going up
5) It's only __ years
6) He's a good mentor/locker room guy
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,266
And1: 5,253
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: Fundamental problems or growing pains? 

Post#2 » by Kilo » Mon Jan 25, 2016 12:37 pm

Fundamental Problems in that Andre Drummond is not a cornerstone franchise player and is treated as one and about to be paid as one. He'll never be a even passable free throw shooter because it's all mental with him, and he's soft serve ice cream. If you can hit 70% in practice and then shoot 25% in games - he can't take the pressure and all eyes being on him. That means you can't play him late in close games - so we have a $22M player on the bench in crunch time.

Stan, KCP and Reggie are growing pains. I think Reggie might be feeling some pressure or awkwardness from Jennings actually, and that might be something that needs to be addressed one way or another.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
Redeemed
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,519
And1: 419
Joined: Apr 06, 2012
     

Re: Fundamental problems or growing pains? 

Post#3 » by Redeemed » Mon Jan 25, 2016 1:05 pm

Dre - is an immature guy who is just learning the game. This is pretty remarkable when you consider the rate of his improvement over last season. The guy is growing and learning and he creates so many problems that teams have to got to the Hack a Dre to compete. I'm optimistic that he'll get to the 50 to 60 percent range at some point. Growing

KCP - has elite defender written all over him. He is by far the best example of what it means to give consistent effort. As for his offense, he has been consistent on offense for several games now. Growing

Reggie - is learning to be more assertive and definitive with his dribble. We've seen Jennings (a career starter) suffer through the growing pains of learning SVG's system. Even Jameer struggled with it which is why at varying points Turkoglu rain the point forward many times.. Reggie has shown signs of brilliance that have exceeded what Jennings has done here. He's growing

Stanimal - has been more impressive to me in the area of confidence and maturity. He screws up but still have the will to take and make key plays in crunch time. His comments about just ignoring the refs and playing says a lot about him. Dude is special. Growing
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 48,969
And1: 12,471
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: Fundamental problems or growing pains? 

Post#4 » by BadMofoPimp » Mon Jan 25, 2016 1:36 pm

Kilo wrote:Fundamental Problems in that Andre Drummond is not a cornerstone franchise player and is treated as one and about to be paid as one. He'll never be a even passable free throw shooter because it's all mental with him, and he's soft serve ice cream. If you can hit 70% in practice and then shoot 25% in games - he can't take the pressure and all eyes being on him. That means you can't play him late in close games - so we have a $22M player on the bench in crunch time.



FYI. Dwight, Shaq and Deandre have been relegated to the bench in crunch time.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,266
And1: 5,253
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: Fundamental problems or growing pains? 

Post#5 » by Kilo » Mon Jan 25, 2016 2:07 pm

BadMofoPimp wrote:
Kilo wrote:Fundamental Problems in that Andre Drummond is not a cornerstone franchise player and is treated as one and about to be paid as one. He'll never be a even passable free throw shooter because it's all mental with him, and he's soft serve ice cream. If you can hit 70% in practice and then shoot 25% in games - he can't take the pressure and all eyes being on him. That means you can't play him late in close games - so we have a $22M player on the bench in crunch time.



FYI. Dwight, Shaq and Deandre have been relegated to the bench in crunch time.


We don't have Harden, Kobe, Wade, Paul, Griffin either. DeAndre is not their offensive centerpiece either. Dwight and Shaq are also much better free throw shooters than Dre - Shaq being career 52% and D12 a career 57%. Drummond is a career 38% currently shooting 29% in 11 January games.

So until we add a first ballot hall-of famer scoring guard in our back court, it's a fundamental problem.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
User avatar
pistontr
Analyst
Posts: 3,010
And1: 275
Joined: Mar 10, 2012

Re: Fundamental problems or growing pains? 

Post#6 » by pistontr » Mon Jan 25, 2016 2:13 pm

there is no such thing as growing pain
Sorry for my poor english
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 48,969
And1: 12,471
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: Fundamental problems or growing pains? 

Post#7 » by BadMofoPimp » Mon Jan 25, 2016 2:23 pm

Kilo wrote:
BadMofoPimp wrote:
Kilo wrote:Fundamental Problems in that Andre Drummond is not a cornerstone franchise player and is treated as one and about to be paid as one. He'll never be a even passable free throw shooter because it's all mental with him, and he's soft serve ice cream. If you can hit 70% in practice and then shoot 25% in games - he can't take the pressure and all eyes being on him. That means you can't play him late in close games - so we have a $22M player on the bench in crunch time.



FYI. Dwight, Shaq and Deandre have been relegated to the bench in crunch time.


We don't have Harden, Kobe, Wade, Paul, Griffin either. DeAndre is not their offensive centerpiece either. Dwight and Shaq are also much better free throw shooters than Dre - Shaq being career 52% and D12 a career 57%. Drummond is a career 38% currently shooting 29% in 11 January games.

So until we add a first ballot hall-of famer scoring guard in our back court, it's a fundamental problem.


Who did Dwight have?

How about Shaq when he was in Orlando. Penny was not a goto scorer either.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
Bakuto
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,362
And1: 1,301
Joined: Mar 15, 2014
     

Re: Fundamental problems or growing pains? 

Post#8 » by Bakuto » Mon Jan 25, 2016 2:30 pm

pistontr wrote:there is no such thing as growing pain


A team where the 4 key players of the future are 19, 22, 22 and 25. That's an average age of 22, playing in a league where the best teams' core pieces are an average age of what, 28? Yeah I'd say growing pains exist, especially with the mistakes a lot of our young guys have made.
Kobe System wrote:I won't touch Drummond's contract. I'd rather have Deng and Mozgov's contract tbh.


Collymore wrote:Jay Tatum is a better prospect than Lebron James was at his age.


:noway:
User avatar
The Penguin
"Beat The Commish" Champion/Mr. Clean Slate
Posts: 7,267
And1: 4,109
Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Location: Columbus
     

Re: Fundamental problems or growing pains? 

Post#9 » by The Penguin » Mon Jan 25, 2016 2:49 pm

Kilo wrote:
BadMofoPimp wrote:
Kilo wrote:Fundamental Problems in that Andre Drummond is not a cornerstone franchise player and is treated as one and about to be paid as one. He'll never be a even passable free throw shooter because it's all mental with him, and he's soft serve ice cream. If you can hit 70% in practice and then shoot 25% in games - he can't take the pressure and all eyes being on him. That means you can't play him late in close games - so we have a $22M player on the bench in crunch time.



FYI. Dwight, Shaq and Deandre have been relegated to the bench in crunch time.


We don't have Harden, Kobe, Wade, Paul, Griffin either. DeAndre is not their offensive centerpiece either. Dwight and Shaq are also much better free throw shooters than Dre - Shaq being career 52% and D12 a career 57%. Drummond is a career 38% currently shooting 29% in 11 January games.

So until we add a first ballot hall-of famer scoring guard in our back court, it's a fundamental problem.




I don't know that not having a go to offensive shot dominator is quite the kiss of death that it was 5+ years ago. Specifically, I don't know that just letting a "Harden" try to trade baskets with Lebron & Kyrie is the way to win the East, nor is it the way to beat the Spurs (Kwahi is just too good one of one defensively) or the Warriors (too good as a team defensively). The Spurs and Warriors very clearly have all NBA level players, which certainly helps their case, but they play very well as a unit, keep the ball ahead of the defense and exploit weak points in other teams defensively. Maybe that will be a fad and we'll regress back to the Lebrons of the world pounding the air out of the ball, but I think the offensive evolution that's been shown is too smart to regress back to the stone age.

Instead of a go to perimeter scorer, the thing I think we really need is a 4 like Draymond / Blake who can create and exploit mismatches and allow us to run smaller with a long 3&D wing replacing Drummond for stretches and to account for the end of game weaknesses shown by Dre. Morris might be able to fill that role, but I see him more as our "Harrison Barnes", the guy who can play some SF when we go big then slide over to PF when our missing 4 takes some minutes at the 5. I really think the Draymond / Blake versatile 4's are the new version of the old school McGrady / Vince Carter / AI's of this smarter basketball age. Just as important and just as hard to find as those perimeter guys used to be. The real irony is the Cavs have the perfect guy for that position in Lebron, but he's not willing to do the banging that Draymond happily takes on.
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,266
And1: 5,253
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: Fundamental problems or growing pains? 

Post#10 » by Kilo » Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:13 pm

^Lebron has a lot more miles on his body though. He's only 31, but probably 35-36 in "basketball age" given his starting at 18, all the very deep play-off runs, and the international games played.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:
vic
Veteran
Posts: 2,619
And1: 1,101
Joined: Dec 27, 2012

Re: Fundamental problems or growing pains? 

Post#11 » by vic » Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:36 pm

growing pains... simply because of age.

They need to grow up mentally. Stanley Johnson is going to be the leader of the team, but that will take time.

If I was SVG I would institute a "no talk to refs if under 30" and "no talking to refs during live play" policy. Their minds are just too scattered. Then need to grow up quick and stop expecting the refs to give them things.

SVG needs to start Stanley ASAP to get some mental strength and defensive effort into the starting lineup. Reggie and Drummond are athletic but mentally lazy defenders.

If this core stays together and they keep Jennings... they are going to gel and be a consistent force within a year...
You need 2-way wings, 2-way shooting bigs, and you can't allow low iq players on the court. Assist/turnover ratio is crucial. Shooting point guards are icing on the cake IF they are plus defenders.
Weaver & Casey, govern yourselves accordingly!
User avatar
bballnmike
Veteran
Posts: 2,671
And1: 1,531
Joined: Jan 17, 2011
Location: Brooklyn, NY
     

Re: Fundamental problems or growing pains? 

Post#12 » by bballnmike » Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:56 pm

Definitely growing pains. First, obviously these guys are all young so it's somewhat to be expected. Then second, almost every problem you listed can be attributed to experience, consistency, or bball IQ/shot selection (and even Drummond's FTs seem to be a mental thing). All of those things SHOULD improve as they get more experience and play together more.
Image
El Chivo
Starter
Posts: 2,317
And1: 978
Joined: Jun 19, 2015
Location: Roma
       

Re: Fundamental problems or growing pains? 

Post#13 » by El Chivo » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:09 pm

Kilo wrote:Fundamental Problems in that Andre Drummond is not a cornerstone franchise player and is treated as one and about to be paid as one. He'll never be a even passable free throw shooter because it's all mental with him, and he's soft serve ice cream. If you can hit 70% in practice and then shoot 25% in games - he can't take the pressure and all eyes being on him. That means you can't play him late in close games - so we have a $22M player on the bench in crunch time.

Stan, KCP and Reggie are growing pains. I think Reggie might be feeling some pressure or awkwardness from Jennings actually, and that might be something that needs to be addressed one way or another.


agree 100%
You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.
chrbal
RealGM
Posts: 21,553
And1: 1,996
Joined: Mar 02, 2001
Contact:

Re: Fundamental problems or growing pains? 

Post#14 » by chrbal » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:11 pm

Crazy young core, most key players would still get carded. I think we make the playoffs as a 6th seed and then make a major leap next year assuming we can keep Andre.
Blomberg
Junior
Posts: 274
And1: 265
Joined: Aug 04, 2013
Location: Finland
 

Re: Fundamental problems or growing pains? 

Post#15 » by Blomberg » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:40 pm

We are over 50%. Most of the fans thought we`d be around 45-55% for the season if you asked last summer. Many fans have raised their expectations because we`ve had some impressive wins, but we are exactly where we are supposed to be.

We`ll be fine.
User avatar
Timmaytime
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 6,890
And1: 1,717
Joined: Feb 03, 2013
Location: Beer City, USA
 

Re: Fundamental problems or growing pains? 

Post#16 » by Timmaytime » Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:56 pm

Combination of both. For one, this core is not fundamentally sound enough to win a championship. We need one more difference maker at least, maybe 2. To add to that, our entire core is 25 or under, and the rest of our rotation (outside of Tolliver) are under-30 and have never had meaningful leadership experience.

We'll get there eventually, for now let's hope someone really wants to play in Detroit
ComboGuardCity wrote:If Bellinelli drops 50 and we lose I’ll eat my dog
Billl
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,221
And1: 3,357
Joined: Sep 06, 2013

Re: Fundamental problems or growing pains? 

Post#17 » by Billl » Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:21 pm

It's a fundamental problem. Currently, our best players aren't our hardest workers. That's not generally a formula for success nor a habit that is easy to change.
vic
Veteran
Posts: 2,619
And1: 1,101
Joined: Dec 27, 2012

Re: Fundamental problems or growing pains? 

Post#18 » by vic » Tue Jan 26, 2016 2:35 pm

""I wanted to put some pressure on the ball, and hopefully did so tonight, and kind of relieved my teammates by buying us some time. Everybody else does it to us so I kind of wanted to reciprocate," Jackson said."

Amaaaazing. 70 games as a starting pg and you finally decide to put some pressure on the ball. That's the growth we're looking for.

Now you need to figure out how to get your franchise center Andre Drummond 10 points a game on lobs and layup instead of using the pick & roll for yourself 80% of the time...
You need 2-way wings, 2-way shooting bigs, and you can't allow low iq players on the court. Assist/turnover ratio is crucial. Shooting point guards are icing on the cake IF they are plus defenders.
Weaver & Casey, govern yourselves accordingly!
edmunder_prc
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,746
And1: 824
Joined: Dec 06, 2015
   

Re: Fundamental problems or growing pains? 

Post#19 » by edmunder_prc » Tue Jan 26, 2016 3:21 pm

Team is way better than I thought it would be, beating the best teams in the league. Mentally a very soft team.

Stanley Johnson - He is going to be very good. No reason to worry there. He is looking way better than KCP did coming into the league. No concerns there. Can already shoot the 3 ball pretty well, better ball handling, his defense errors seem to be mostly mental, he can stay in front and body up most guys.

KCP - He's playing way better. Let's see him finish this way for the rest of the season and call me a believer!

Reggie - He's won the team many games. He has off nights, but not many. He would be better if the rest of the team was better or were better spot up shooters.

Drummond - The free throw shooting is so bad. If we make the playoffs you can expect EVERY team to follow the same script. Foul Drummond. Pull some scrubs off the bench, foul Drummond. If he is a bad shooter in January games what do you think is going to happen in a game 7 in the playoffs. He might feint. We could see 4-5 air balls in a row. So far we've won games that have tried that strategy but I argue its because those teams weren't very good. The last team Houston did and it really helped them, but they were a bad team. If a better team is playing us and we start shooting well of playing well. Foul Drummond. Its like a free time out with the ball back. Do a few times in a row, get our team out of sync.

I don't know what to say. Fingers crossed he plays better. Its nothing but frustration when I see someone who is a professional and I could do something better than him. I mean even in the MLB pitchers would be better hitters than us. Goalies would be better scorers than us. Etc. Yet I could go into an NBA Stadium and shoot better than 30% on several hundred free throws attempts. Its an open shot for a guy who played basketball for years under professional coaching.
User avatar
Kilo
RealGM
Posts: 12,266
And1: 5,253
Joined: Jun 18, 2011
 

Re: Fundamental problems or growing pains? 

Post#20 » by Kilo » Tue Jan 26, 2016 3:58 pm

The Pistons are accustomed to Andre Drummond missing free throws, and he was 1 of 10 Monday. The rest of the team was 15 of 23. Reggie Jackson, Stanley Johnson, Brandon Jennings and Aron Baynes, all competent free-throw shooters, missed two each and were 7 of 15 collectively. "Andre's, we're just going to have to live with that. But the others, yeah, that's a problem," Van Gundy said.


We're going to have to live with Andre shooting 1-for-10 from the foul line. Think about that and tell me how a team can contend with a 22M/yr player who can't play in close games late, or even in blow out leads for that matter.

That is a fundamental problem.
Weaver = Hinkie
VW to Portland :pray:

Return to Detroit Pistons