ImageImageImageImageImage

PG: "It's Just Us Here."

Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi

User avatar
Deeeez Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 49,229
And1: 55,126
Joined: Nov 12, 2004

Re: PG: "It's Just Us Here." 

Post#301 » by Deeeez Knicks » Fri Feb 5, 2016 6:31 pm

To be fair everyone said we would get Monroe and either trade the pick or get someone like WCS or Winslow last offseason and were completely off. We are still not great, but the offseason was a lot better then people imagined.

Phil has been good in most of his player moves. Whether the system/coach can work, and if we can get the guards to run a more modern offense is a bigger question.
Mavs
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
User avatar
newyorker4ever
RealGM
Posts: 10,412
And1: 4,671
Joined: Jan 03, 2012
     

Re: PG: 

Post#302 » by newyorker4ever » Fri Feb 5, 2016 6:35 pm

Ron Mexico wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
JayKnicKz11 wrote:I'm cool with you but this is a ******* loser mentality. Not showing up to start the game is a huge sign that we have no leader. Yet you're not mad. FOH

Don't you think that us shooting 27% in the 1st half also had a lot to do with why we were so bad?? It's pretty obvious that it was.


The knife just has to cut both ways. You can't discredit for the start and credit for the comeback.

That said, coach needs to have the team ready to give effort. If Fisher is a motivator, then it should just be about missed shots. But I saw Detroit open up the game with jump shot practice. Knicks came out pancake booty flat.

I won't look at the comeback effort in a vacuum though. Sometimes you wake up after you get hit in the mouth. But that first half was one of the sorriest displays of basketball in recent memory. We were sixers bad.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Ok then tell me thi and i'm not sticking up for Fisher but this is a legit question. How do you know that it's the fault of Fisher for them not coming with the effort needed and that he didn't do everything he could to pep talk them into giving everything they have and it was just the players coming out in their own funk?? All Fisher can do is talk to them and tell them they need to give everything they have when they get out on the court, he can't do anything more than that. All season long it's been said how hard these guys play even when they're out of the game and it's been pretty noticeable.
User avatar
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,170
And1: 62,279
Joined: May 16, 2005
Location: In Your Head, USA
   

Re: PG: 

Post#303 » by HarthorneWingo » Fri Feb 5, 2016 6:38 pm

newyorker4ever wrote:
Ron Mexico wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:Don't you think that us shooting 27% in the 1st half also had a lot to do with why we were so bad?? It's pretty obvious that it was.


The knife just has to cut both ways. You can't discredit for the start and credit for the comeback.

That said, coach needs to have the team ready to give effort. If Fisher is a motivator, then it should just be about missed shots. But I saw Detroit open up the game with jump shot practice. Knicks came out pancake booty flat.

I won't look at the comeback effort in a vacuum though. Sometimes you wake up after you get hit in the mouth. But that first half was one of the sorriest displays of basketball in recent memory. We were sixers bad.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Ok then tell me thi and i'm not sticking up for Fisher but this is a legit question. How do you know that it's the fault of Fisher for them not coming with the effort needed and that he didn't do everything he could to pep talk them into giving everything they have and it was just the players coming out in their own funk?? All Fisher can do is talk to them and tell them they need to give everything they have when they get out on the court, he can't do anything more than that. All season long it's been said how hard these guys play even when they're out of the game and it's been pretty noticeable.


Rah-rah speeches over an 82 game schedule wear thin quick. We have a lot of veterans on the team. Coming out hard, especially after the loss at home to the Celts, shouldn't even be an issue. Aren't there any leaders on the team?
Free Palestine
User avatar
Fat Kat
RealGM
Posts: 34,842
And1: 35,533
Joined: Apr 19, 2004
     

Re: PG: "It's Just Us Here." 

Post#304 » by Fat Kat » Fri Feb 5, 2016 6:40 pm

TrueWarrior wrote:When Phil got here he kept saying he wasn't married to the triangle. That he just wanted system basketball that didn't 100% rely on pick and roll after pick and roll and to let everybody on the floor get involved. That he wanted to be like the Spurs.

Everybody should be down for that. So then IDK why we're being so damn strict with the triangle. Other teams incorporate triangle sets into their offense, but they're much more versatile. All that talk about Fish altering the system a bit and wanting to push the pace have all went out the window. This team is as slow, predictable, stagnant, and jump shot happy as ever. The ugliest offense I've seen in quite a while.

Would like to see what happens if we threw this isosceles system out the window and just gave Grant the keys to run said pick and roll after pick and roll with our starters instead of Lou Amundson.


Is Fish capable? The team isn't even running their triangle sets with precision. As a matter of fact, teams that don't fully run the triangle run triangle sets better than us. That's why people's perception of the triangle is skewed. Our guys run it terribly.

Fisher can't seem to get this guys to run and cut with a sense of urgency. If we switch systems, it should be because we switched coaches. I'm not advocating that yet, but his decisions continue to be head scratchers.

As far the a PnR offense goes, if we do what everybody else is doing, we'll still need superior talent and execution to beat better teams. Our guards don't fit that bill.
All comments made by Fat Kat are given as opinion, which may or may not be derived from facts, and not made to personally attack anyone on Realgm. All rights reserved.®
User avatar
TrueWarrior
RealGM
Posts: 19,103
And1: 8,519
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Behind You

Re: PG: "It's Just Us Here." 

Post#305 » by TrueWarrior » Fri Feb 5, 2016 6:44 pm

Fat Kat wrote:
TrueWarrior wrote:When Phil got here he kept saying he wasn't married to the triangle. That he just wanted system basketball that didn't 100% rely on pick and roll after pick and roll and to let everybody on the floor get involved. That he wanted to be like the Spurs.

Everybody should be down for that. So then IDK why we're being so damn strict with the triangle. Other teams incorporate triangle sets into their offense, but they're much more versatile. All that talk about Fish altering the system a bit and wanting to push the pace have all went out the window. This team is as slow, predictable, stagnant, and jump shot happy as ever. The ugliest offense I've seen in quite a while.

Would like to see what happens if we threw this isosceles system out the window and just gave Grant the keys to run said pick and roll after pick and roll with our starters instead of Lou Amundson.


Is Fish capable? The team isn't even running their triangle sets with precision. As a matter of fact, teams that don't fully run the triangle run triangle sets better than us. That's why people's perception of the triangle is skewed. Our guys run it terribly.

Fisher can't seem to get this guys to run and cut with a sense of urgency. If we switch systems, it should be because we switched coaches. I'm not advocating that yet, but his decisions continue to be head scratchers.

As far the a PnR offense goes, if we do what everybody else is doing, we'll still need superior talent and execution to beat better teams. Our guards don't fit that bill.


Yea I see the laziest cuts ever with this team. Nobody seems like they want the ball. Nobody looks like they know what the hell they're doing in general.

Last night was also about effort though. Nothing should piss a fan off more than when your team comes out with the energy of Ben Stein.
User avatar
newyorker4ever
RealGM
Posts: 10,412
And1: 4,671
Joined: Jan 03, 2012
     

Re: PG: "It's Just Us Here." 

Post#306 » by newyorker4ever » Fri Feb 5, 2016 6:45 pm

Capn'O wrote:They're not going to ask him about a trade. They'll probably check in with him at season's end to see where he's at with the process. That's roughly how they'll word it. If he's unhappy, Melo will initiate the "T" word and you go from there.

If Phil doesn't get a significant player at this trade deadline or in the off season then i can see him going to Melo to tell him that it's gonna be a longer rebuilding project than what they/he thought it was gonna be so either Melo decides to stay and play with average players on a average team for the next 2/3 years or he can be traded to a contending team, because i'm sure the way Phil and Melo have spoken to each other up to this point is that it wouldn't take long to build this team to a contending team, so if Phil tells him he's looking at it being at least 2/3 years maybe he'll change his mind about staying. Getting big name players here should be a big part of Melo's job as well. He knows all these big name players so he should be able to talk to whichever ones are about to be free agents and ask them what the chances are of them coming to New York in private and the ones he doesn't know personally he probably knows another player that does know them personally who could help him with this. Players talk to each other privately all the time about stuff like this which nobody in the media or anyone besides them know what's being talked about so do your part of this Melo.
User avatar
mpharris36
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 112,198
And1: 115,875
Joined: Nov 03, 2010
     

Re: PG: "It's Just Us Here." 

Post#307 » by mpharris36 » Fri Feb 5, 2016 6:52 pm

TrueWarrior wrote:
Fat Kat wrote:
TrueWarrior wrote:When Phil got here he kept saying he wasn't married to the triangle. That he just wanted system basketball that didn't 100% rely on pick and roll after pick and roll and to let everybody on the floor get involved. That he wanted to be like the Spurs.

Everybody should be down for that. So then IDK why we're being so damn strict with the triangle. Other teams incorporate triangle sets into their offense, but they're much more versatile. All that talk about Fish altering the system a bit and wanting to push the pace have all went out the window. This team is as slow, predictable, stagnant, and jump shot happy as ever. The ugliest offense I've seen in quite a while.

Would like to see what happens if we threw this isosceles system out the window and just gave Grant the keys to run said pick and roll after pick and roll with our starters instead of Lou Amundson.


Is Fish capable? The team isn't even running their triangle sets with precision. As a matter of fact, teams that don't fully run the triangle run triangle sets better than us. That's why people's perception of the triangle is skewed. Our guys run it terribly.

Fisher can't seem to get this guys to run and cut with a sense of urgency. If we switch systems, it should be because we switched coaches. I'm not advocating that yet, but his decisions continue to be head scratchers.

As far the a PnR offense goes, if we do what everybody else is doing, we'll still need superior talent and execution to beat better teams. Our guards don't fit that bill.


Yea I see the laziest cuts ever with this team. Nobody seems like they want the ball. Nobody looks like they know what the hell they're doing in general.

Last night was also about effort though. Nothing should piss a fan off more than when your team comes out with the energy of Ben Stein.


Yeah I gotta agree here. Not one of our players actually cuts with any sense of urgency. That is one of key options in the triangle. If no one cuts then its basically just an iso offense. The point of the cuts is to hit a driver to the basket. If the first cut isn't there the cutter next option should be to back screen for the player on the weak side to cut in and they don't do that either.

They just lazy trot through the paint and let Melo or AA ISO 1 on 1.
4-Peat! 22-25 BAF Champion Spurs:

ROSTER

Walker Kessler/Daniel Gafford/Adem Bona
Nikola Jokic/Santi Aldama/Isaiah Stewart
Aaron Nesmith/Josh Hart/Jaime Jaquez
Alex Caruso/Keon Ellis/Justin Champagnie
Steph Curry/Chris Paul/Ryan Rollins
User avatar
newyorker4ever
RealGM
Posts: 10,412
And1: 4,671
Joined: Jan 03, 2012
     

Re: PG: 

Post#308 » by newyorker4ever » Fri Feb 5, 2016 6:53 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
Ron Mexico wrote:
The knife just has to cut both ways. You can't discredit for the start and credit for the comeback.

That said, coach needs to have the team ready to give effort. If Fisher is a motivator, then it should just be about missed shots. But I saw Detroit open up the game with jump shot practice. Knicks came out pancake booty flat.

I won't look at the comeback effort in a vacuum though. Sometimes you wake up after you get hit in the mouth. But that first half was one of the sorriest displays of basketball in recent memory. We were sixers bad.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Ok then tell me thi and i'm not sticking up for Fisher but this is a legit question. How do you know that it's the fault of Fisher for them not coming with the effort needed and that he didn't do everything he could to pep talk them into giving everything they have and it was just the players coming out in their own funk?? All Fisher can do is talk to them and tell them they need to give everything they have when they get out on the court, he can't do anything more than that. All season long it's been said how hard these guys play even when they're out of the game and it's been pretty noticeable.


Rah-rah speeches over an 82 game schedule wear thin quick. We have a lot of veterans on the team. Coming out hard, especially after the loss at home to the Celts, shouldn't even be an issue. Aren't there any leaders on the team?

Well said. I just think that there's plenty of Knick fans that are such Fisher haters that they convince themselves that everything that goes wrong is Fisher's fault which i don't understand. So if these professional players don't play hard the fault automatically goes to Fisher like these guys that are getting paid millions of dollars can't motivate themselves which is absolutely ridiculous. I think the Fisher haters need to take their hater blinders off and stop blaming Fisher for everything that isn't working for the Knicks. I don't love Fisher or think he's a great coach but i do believe he's better than a lot of fans give him credit for and he's still learning.
User avatar
John Murdoch
RealGM
Posts: 10,250
And1: 7,720
Joined: Sep 16, 2013
         

Re: PG: "It's Just Us Here." 

Post#309 » by John Murdoch » Fri Feb 5, 2016 6:55 pm

Triple C wrote:

lol i was like wth when i saw this. you would think the natural reaction would be escape dribble to the right forner corner 3 but he does a 360 spinning towards dude lol
Magic#1 wrote:We have won two playoff games in two years. If we decide to keep this team for the next two years, maybe it will feel like we won a series.
User avatar
F N 11
RealGM
Posts: 94,883
And1: 67,611
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Getting over screens with Gusto.
Contact:
 

Re: PG: "It's Just Us Here." 

Post#310 » by F N 11 » Fri Feb 5, 2016 6:55 pm

Johnny Hoops wrote:
JayKnicKz11 wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:Don't you think that us shooting 27% in the 1st half also had a lot to do with why we were so bad?? It's pretty obvious that it was.

MOAR JUMPSHOTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MOARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

Dont ever adjust!! Just shoot MOARRRRRRR JUMPSHOTS


I'm no spelling champ, plus don't like to make comments on stuff like this and maybe I'm missing the point but are you meaning to say MORE???

It goes back to our days with D antoni. When we shot a lot of three's the slogan was "MOAR THREES" when you're been on the board for so long you pick up on trends and slangs. I know how to spell lol.
CEO of the not trading RJ Club
User avatar
Sark
RealGM
Posts: 19,274
And1: 16,051
Joined: Sep 21, 2010
Location: Merry Pills
 

Re: PG: 

Post#311 » by Sark » Fri Feb 5, 2016 6:57 pm

newyorker4ever wrote:
Ron Mexico wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:Don't you think that us shooting 27% in the 1st half also had a lot to do with why we were so bad?? It's pretty obvious that it was.


The knife just has to cut both ways. You can't discredit for the start and credit for the comeback.

That said, coach needs to have the team ready to give effort. If Fisher is a motivator, then it should just be about missed shots. But I saw Detroit open up the game with jump shot practice. Knicks came out pancake booty flat.

I won't look at the comeback effort in a vacuum though. Sometimes you wake up after you get hit in the mouth. But that first half was one of the sorriest displays of basketball in recent memory. We were sixers bad.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

Ok then tell me thi and i'm not sticking up for Fisher but this is a legit question. How do you know that it's the fault of Fisher for them not coming with the effort needed and that he didn't do everything he could to pep talk them into giving everything they have and it was just the players coming out in their own funk?? All Fisher can do is talk to them and tell them they need to give everything they have when they get out on the court, he can't do anything more than that. All season long it's been said how hard these guys play even when they're out of the game and it's been pretty noticeable.


The task you are talking about is exactly what Fisher's job is to do. If they come out flat, then that is his fault. If they come out fired up and ready, he gets credit. But how a team plays completely falls on the shoulders of the coach.
Greenie
RealGM
Posts: 58,966
And1: 30,697
Joined: Feb 25, 2010

Re: PG: "It's Just Us Here." 

Post#312 » by Greenie » Fri Feb 5, 2016 6:57 pm

Melo is never leaving....dab
Melo is never leaving....dab
Melo is never leaving....dab
Melo is never leaving....dab
Melo is never leaving....dab
Melo is never leaving....dab
User avatar
Fat Kat
RealGM
Posts: 34,842
And1: 35,533
Joined: Apr 19, 2004
     

Re: PG: "It's Just Us Here." 

Post#313 » by Fat Kat » Fri Feb 5, 2016 7:00 pm

Fat Kat wrote:
TrueWarrior wrote:When Phil got here he kept saying he wasn't married to the triangle. That he just wanted system basketball that didn't 100% rely on pick and roll after pick and roll and to let everybody on the floor get involved. That he wanted to be like the Spurs.

Everybody should be down for that. So then IDK why we're being so damn strict with the triangle. Other teams incorporate triangle sets into their offense, but they're much more versatile. All that talk about Fish altering the system a bit and wanting to push the pace have all went out the window. This team is as slow, predictable, stagnant, and jump shot happy as ever. The ugliest offense I've seen in quite a while.

Would like to see what happens if we threw this isosceles system out the window and just gave Grant the keys to run said pick and roll after pick and roll with our starters instead of Lou Amundson.


Is Fish capable? The team isn't even running their triangle sets with precision. As a matter of fact, teams that don't fully run the triangle run triangle sets better than us. That's why people's perception of the triangle is skewed. Our guys run it terribly.

Fisher can't seem to get this guys to run and cut with a sense of urgency. If we switch systems, it should be because we switched coaches. I'm not advocating that yet, but his decisions continue to be head scratchers.

As far the a PnR offense goes, if we do what everybody else is doing, we'll still need superior talent and execution to beat better teams. Our guards don't fit that bill.


Yep. Terrible effort and they go through sets as if they're confused. WTF are all of these coaches doing? Googling platitudes for Fish's timeouts?

Also, if you have to bench Jose because he's such a liability, why start him in the first place? He didn't even try to stay with his man. Instaswitch. Some guys get away with that crap, some are benched immediately, others are benched indefinitely. Fisher seems to contradict himself daily.
All comments made by Fat Kat are given as opinion, which may or may not be derived from facts, and not made to personally attack anyone on Realgm. All rights reserved.®
R-DAWG
RealGM
Posts: 19,942
And1: 6,002
Joined: Nov 07, 2003

Re: PG: "It's Just Us Here." 

Post#314 » by R-DAWG » Fri Feb 5, 2016 7:08 pm

knickst4pe wrote:
R-DAWG wrote:
DaGawd wrote:When Melo settles for the late game 3 every time<<<<

Old age is showing.. Driving is too much work for him


But we can't trade him, he's a mentor for Porzingis. We might be the 6th seed in 3 years with him.

What has gone on here the past 2.5 years is so unacceptable. It's so frustrating. It's so embarrassing.

It's everything James Dolan deserves.


yeah trade him for 2 late chicago firsts and a late clippers first like you suggested on the trades & transaction board. you're the greatest.


My trade also had 2 lotto picks in it but lets' leave out 40% of the trade.

Getting our pick back along with Sacramento's pick along with 3 late 1sts for Melo. I'll do that deal.
User avatar
K_ick_God
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 80,879
And1: 43,336
Joined: Oct 10, 2003
   

Re: PG: "It's Just Us Here." 

Post#315 » by K_ick_God » Fri Feb 5, 2016 7:27 pm

I just want to know what happened in that Boston game, and right before it. We were playing some super-heated, crisp basketball. Looked like a totally different team. I'm not saying what's happened since -- Melo got hurt, KP is off for some reason. But I really want to know what happened to cause the team to click like that pretty suddenly. Was it just random? If not whatever it was, do it again.

The season feels lost though. You'd like to keep hopes high, but really what good reasons are there for that. The teams above us seem to have their act together and while I do give this team some credit for not quitting, which we have seen a lot and may be something you can attribute to Fisher, I also don't see signs of them getting over the hump. They seem to be able to bump along the bottom without falling apart, which is admirable, but they don't seem to be able to sustain their progress either.
Knicks Byke
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,841
And1: 4,888
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
   

Re: PG: "It's Just Us Here." 

Post#316 » by Knicks Byke » Fri Feb 5, 2016 7:29 pm

John Murdoch wrote:
Triple C wrote:

lol i was like wth when i saw this. you would think the natural reaction would be escape dribble to the right forner corner 3 but he does a 360 spinning towards dude lol


when you accidentally hit the wrong move in 2k :lol: :lol:
User avatar
K_ick_God
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 80,879
And1: 43,336
Joined: Oct 10, 2003
   

Re: PG: "It's Just Us Here." 

Post#317 » by K_ick_God » Fri Feb 5, 2016 7:36 pm

Knicks Bycke wrote:
John Murdoch wrote:
Triple C wrote:

lol i was like wth when i saw this. you would think the natural reaction would be escape dribble to the right forner corner 3 but he does a 360 spinning towards dude lol


when you accidentally hit the wrong move in 2k :lol: :lol:


Please. We were down 3. It's an excellent move in rhythm. Silly criticism.
NOOB77
General Manager
Posts: 9,165
And1: 3,288
Joined: Aug 17, 2007
   

Re: PG: "It's Just Us Here." 

Post#318 » by NOOB77 » Fri Feb 5, 2016 7:40 pm

KnicksGod wrote:I just want to know what happened in that Boston game, and right before it. We were playing some super-heated, crisp basketball. Looked like a totally different team. I'm not saying what's happened since -- Melo got hurt, KP is off for some reason. But I really want to know what happened to cause the team to click like that pretty suddenly. Was it just random? If not whatever it was, do it again.

The season feels lost though. You'd like to keep hopes high, but really what good reasons are there for that. The teams above us seem to have their act together and while I do give this team some credit for not quitting, which we have seen a lot and may be something you can attribute to Fisher, I also don't see signs of them getting over the hump. They seem to be able to bump along the bottom without falling apart, which is admirable, but they don't seem to be able to sustain their progress either.



Melo got hurt I think is the only real thing that happened. We were in a nice flow. Melo creating easy shots for every one. Once Melo went down it ruined the flow. People got out of sorts. Shots weren't wide open anymore. Nobody could create those easy chances on the team besides Melo. Now Melo is back and we see it in spurts but he isn't 100% so he can't do it for an entire game so we see things like we did yesterday.

How to fix? We need a PG that can create for others. Melo is the only one on the team that can do it. We will be totally reliant on Melo until we can get a PG that can do those same things.

Right now we are asking Melo to be ....Our primary scorer, Our primary play makers, Our #1 rebounder, and our tone setter on defense. When you are reliant on one player to do all those things and he isn't 100% healthy then you will have problems.
User avatar
Capn'O
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 89,824
And1: 109,436
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Bone Goal
 

Re: PG: "It's Just Us Here." 

Post#319 » by Capn'O » Fri Feb 5, 2016 7:46 pm

NYKfan77 wrote:
KnicksGod wrote:I just want to know what happened in that Boston game, and right before it. We were playing some super-heated, crisp basketball. Looked like a totally different team. I'm not saying what's happened since -- Melo got hurt, KP is off for some reason. But I really want to know what happened to cause the team to click like that pretty suddenly. Was it just random? If not whatever it was, do it again.

The season feels lost though. You'd like to keep hopes high, but really what good reasons are there for that. The teams above us seem to have their act together and while I do give this team some credit for not quitting, which we have seen a lot and may be something you can attribute to Fisher, I also don't see signs of them getting over the hump. They seem to be able to bump along the bottom without falling apart, which is admirable, but they don't seem to be able to sustain their progress either.



Melo got hurt I think is the only real thing that happened. We were in a nice flow. Melo creating easy shots for every one. Once Melo went down it ruined the flow. People got out of sorts. Shots weren't wide open anymore. Nobody could create those easy chances on the team besides Melo. Now Melo is back and we see it in spurts but he isn't 100% so he can't do it for an entire game so we see things like we did yesterday.

How to fix? We need a PG that can create for others. Melo is the only one on the team that can do it. We will be totally reliant on Melo until we can get a PG that can do those same things.

Right now we are asking Melo to be ....Our primary scorer, Our primary play makers, Our #1 rebounder, and our tone setter on defense. When you are reliant on one player to do all those things and he isn't 100% healthy then you will have problems.


Basically, this is what happened to the season. Add to that, our secondary option and defensive tone setter is a rookie, is also hurt, and has slammed into the wall. It is what it is. KP will get better and better able to handle the grind. Melo - we can only hope he is 100% in years coming.

And we need **** guards.
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION

:beer:
User avatar
j4remi
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 38,220
And1: 20,124
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
         

Re: PG: "It's Just Us Here." 

Post#320 » by j4remi » Fri Feb 5, 2016 7:47 pm

god shammgod wrote:i'm one of the guys who appreciates melo more then most on here. you don't have to sell him or the importance of stars to me. but 1 is not enough. it never has been even if you have the best player in the league. the man is 31, it has to happen relatively soon. we're spending 3 years just to get to the 8th spot. the hope, i guess, is that kp develops enough and melo stays healthy enough that the two of them propel us. because as you say and i agree, it's all about stars, and i don't see another one coming.


That's essentially the play, you hope that either KP grows good enough to be a legitimate number two on a championship team while Melo can still be a number one; or that KP becomes a number 1 before Melo regresses to a number 3 or worse. In the mean time, you continue to build the supporting cast so that if either of those scenarios hits you've got an immediate contender. If we land Conley or Durant, awesome, if not; at least we leave multiple options to build from as opposed to the "we've dealt Melo, now let's hope these draft picks work out" scenario which completely eliminates major FA's from the equation without committing a ton of your cap.
C- Turner | Wiseman
PF- Hunter |Clowney | Fleming
SF- Strus | George
SG- Bridges | Dick | Bogdanovic
PG- Haliburton | Sasser

Return to New York Knicks