payitforward wrote:In the 335 minutes Beal has played since his return, I have his productivity per 40 minutes just slightly higher than that of Klay Thompson (i.e. on the whole season so far).
Beal's scoring is better than Thompson's: he's producing 26.75 pts per 40 minutes vs. Thompson's 26 (again, tho, that's on the season), and Beal's TS% for this stretch is .62 vs. Thompson's .59 (through 50 games).
The rest of their on-court numbers per 40 minutes are pretty close overall: Thompson's rebounding a little better, Beal gets more assists. Thompson steals a little less and turns it over a little more. Beal fouls more.
It's worth noting that Thompson is 26, almost 3.5 years older than Bradley Beal. His first 3 seasons were no better than Beal's first 3. He broke out last year.
It's a little too early to give up on Bradley Beal. There are rookies in the league older than Beal! (Actually, I just made that up but I bet it's true anyway)
Then again... it's also too early to give him a max contract, but we'll be forced to I think.
Klay Thompson received a max contract extension with Golden State in 2014. Beal's return has been solid since his return but the sample size is still small.
I would say Thompson was not only more efficient but more importantly much healthier than Bradley Beal in their 3rd seasons. Thompson only missed one game during his first 3 seasons.
Another factor to take into account is that Golden State has been much more competitive than the Wizards. While you can certainly argue that the Warriors had more talent around Klay than Beal, the problem that remains is that how do the Wizards end up acquiring more talent if Beal is to remain on their books as a max contract.
Overall, you do make some good points that Beal is on track to earn a big payday. I think human nature will judge Beal by his recent performance rather than how he performed as a whole in the regular season. If the Wizards make the playoffs, Beal can most likely tear it up and look like a great player especially for teams who do not watch the Wizards on a day to day basis.
Beal may very well have been maxed out already by Washington this offseason. He hasn't for the following reasons- signing Beal to an extensions would have shrunk their cap space to sign Kevin Durant or another major free agent. Plus I believe Beal can only sign a 4 year extension whereas the Wizards can offer him a 5 year deal if the Wizards decide to re-sign him in the 2017 offseason.
At the end of the day, I can certainly understand the rational for moving on from Beal but I suspect that EG will re-sign Beal to a max contract. Even if the Wizards had a better gm, I don't think that Leonsis would let Beal walk.
Of course, there is a small chance that the Wizards could move Beal at the trade deadline but I wouldn't hold my breath.