Edug27 wrote:Only on this board is Boston a better place than OKC for Durant.
Look at it this way. Who is better: OKC without Durant or Boston right now?
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob, canman1971, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
Edug27 wrote:Only on this board is Boston a better place than OKC for Durant.
Banks2Pierce wrote:Edug27 wrote:Only on this board is Boston a better place than OKC for Durant.
Look at it this way. Who is better: OKC without Durant or Boston right now?

Captain_Caveman wrote:Spoiler:
I'd say 50% Warriors, 40% Thunder, 10% everyone else.
Of that 10%, we have as good a shot as anyone, if not better.
FakeScreenName123 wrote:KD's gonna sign a 1+1
djFan71 wrote:Captain_Caveman wrote:Spoiler:
I'd say 50% Warriors, 40% Thunder, 10% everyone else.
Of that 10%, we have as good a shot as anyone, if not better.
Really on GSW that high? Seems like a lose-lose to me if i was KD. Go there and win a chip and everyone thinks you just road coattails. Go there and don't - oh man. Now if they somehow fall apart, don't get 70 wins and don't win a title, that changes things. But joining after they win 2 straight titles, man, I hope KD doesn't do that.
Fencer reregistered wrote:FakeScreenName123 wrote:KD's gonna sign a 1+1
A year from now Durant, Westbrook and Ibaka could all walk. It would be interesting if 2 or more of them joined a team together.
Edug27 wrote:Fencer reregistered wrote:FakeScreenName123 wrote:KD's gonna sign a 1+1
A year from now Durant, Westbrook and Ibaka could all walk. It would be interesting if 2 or more of them joined a team together.
Stop talking like that... makes me think of the Lakers
Fencer reregistered wrote:Edug27 wrote:Fencer reregistered wrote:
A year from now Durant, Westbrook and Ibaka could all walk. It would be interesting if 2 or more of them joined a team together.
Stop talking like that... makes me think of the Lakers
It could also be here.

Captain_Caveman wrote:djFan71 wrote:Captain_Caveman wrote:Spoiler:
I'd say 50% Warriors, 40% Thunder, 10% everyone else.
Of that 10%, we have as good a shot as anyone, if not better.
Really on GSW that high? Seems like a lose-lose to me if i was KD. Go there and win a chip and everyone thinks you just road coattails. Go there and don't - oh man. Now if they somehow fall apart, don't get 70 wins and don't win a title, that changes things. But joining after they win 2 straight titles, man, I hope KD doesn't do that.
If he goes somewhere else and doesn't win, he will face questions about that as well. The tallest trees get the strongest breeze.
All that coattail stuff is just noise, IMO. People say that Bird or Jordan didn't have to sign up with other stars, but I think that's nonsense personally. They were fortunate enough to have HOFers on their teams and due to their ultra competitive nature, they would have absolutely forced their way off of bad teams in order to win rings. No one ever did it alone.
KD is an MVP winner who doesn't need anyone to do it for him. Bottom line is that all those questions end when you get the ring. Warriors are his best chance to do that, and fit his playing style like a glove. A core of Curry/KD/Dray/Klay would be one of the very best ever, and he would get a chance (if not likelihood) of going down as one of the all-time greats.
KD has already played on a team full of defensive grinders, and saw the ceiling there. I doubt he is interested in playing for 2nd place anymore.
Edug27 wrote:Fencer reregistered wrote:Edug27 wrote:
Stop talking like that... makes me think of the Lakers
It could also be here.
Now you're just being silly.
Captain_Caveman wrote:RaptorsFTL wrote:I come in peace guys, but I have a question. Why is KD not a viable option for you? I haven't heard any rumblings, but maybe your beat reporters have in local news stations?
KD would make you the best in the East (though same can probably be said for Toronto as well), but I think the fit is incredible.
I'd say 50% Warriors, 40% Thunder, 10% everyone else.
Of that 10%, we have as good a shot as anyone, if not better.
Fencer reregistered wrote:Edug27 wrote:Fencer reregistered wrote:
It could also be here.
Now you're just being silly.
Nope. Everybody assumes that Durant would only sign here if another star also did (or was traded for). But maybe Ibaka would suffice?
Or consider the angle in which Durant, Westbrook and Ibaka (or just Durant/Westbrook) seek out a team together, and demand that the team S&T with OKC. If we offered OKC Thomas & some picks/prospects for the favor (plus whatever contract filler we needed to send back to make the numbers work), that might be the best deal for all concerned. Ditto if Smart is in the package.
Edug27 wrote:And in what crazy world is Boston that team? All that stress for Brad?

Curmudgeon wrote:If KD goes to the Warriors, who will likely win consecutive championships without him, what kind of legacy is that? If they win another one with him, he'd just be riding on everyone's coattails, like David West in San Antonio.
Darth Celtic wrote:CrowderKeg wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/brohrbach/status/702905075795173376[/tweet]
Probably the funniest thing i've read in months.
Fencer reregistered wrote:Edug27 wrote:And in what crazy world is Boston that team? All that stress for Brad?
Boston is the 7th-best team in the league -- or 6th-best if we subtract OKC's stars from it -- younger and more asset-rich than any team ahead of it.
I can think of various reasons why "that team" is NOT GSW, LAC, SAS, CLE or TOR.
BOS is much better than MIA if we assume age/health issues plaguing Wade and/or Bosh.
Indianapolis? Actually one of the better choices, but David West notwithstanding, I like our recruiting chances against them. Similarly Atlanta, Chicago & Washington.
MEM? There are many ways we're a better choice.