Rookie Discussion Thread

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Nuggets_Talk
Head Coach
Posts: 6,389
And1: 2,298
Joined: Oct 19, 2003
Contact:
 

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#421 » by Nuggets_Talk » Sun Mar 6, 2016 4:55 am

Slava wrote:
Nuggets_Talk wrote:
QUIZ wrote:Pretty much this, plus Winslow's actually contributing 30mpg as part of a playoff rotation. He's helping us win games. He's never gonna win the stats battle, most of what he does doesn't show up in the box score.

But since we adjusted our offense and stopped trying to make him shoot corner three's he's averaged 7.7pts 7.1rebs in 31mpg while shooting 50FG% in his past 18 games.


as already mentioned positions do not count when dealing with all rookie teams.

secondly, neither does team success. so getting to play for miami doesnt give winslow bonus points or anything.

jokic is far out playing winslow this year.


Mentioned by who? You? If Jokic makes the all rookie team, he will have to beat out Porzingis.


dafan334 - just a few posts above these. :lol:

no way jokic beats out porzingis for all rookie first team. but he should definitely beat out winslow.
User avatar
QUIZ
Forum Mod - Heat
Forum Mod - Heat
Posts: 32,014
And1: 78,769
Joined: Feb 02, 2014
Location: South Florida
Contact:
 

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#422 » by QUIZ » Sun Mar 6, 2016 4:58 am

Nuggets_Talk wrote:
QUIZ wrote:
Nuggets_Talk wrote:
as already mentioned positions do not count when dealing with all rookie teams.

secondly, neither does team success. so getting to play for miami doesnt give winslow bonus points or anything.

jokic is far out playing winslow this year.

Ok man he can have the award.


which award? you mean all rookie first team over winslow?

then yes, he should. hes earned it. not sure why you are so upset about it.

I'm really not and I don't pretend that I've watched the Nuggets or Jokic play. If you feel so strongly about it then ok, good luck to him.
Don’t let us get one. — Nikola Jovic

Dru Smith very lucky he got that 500k this year. He should invest and manage a subway after all this-MettaWorldPanda
PG24
Junior
Posts: 358
And1: 252
Joined: Jun 20, 2010

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#423 » by PG24 » Sun Mar 6, 2016 5:15 am

Slava wrote:
Nuggets_Talk wrote:
QUIZ wrote:Pretty much this, plus Winslow's actually contributing 30mpg as part of a playoff rotation. He's helping us win games. He's never gonna win the stats battle, most of what he does doesn't show up in the box score.

But since we adjusted our offense and stopped trying to make him shoot corner three's he's averaged 7.7pts 7.1rebs in 31mpg while shooting 50FG% in his past 18 games.


as already mentioned positions do not count when dealing with all rookie teams.

secondly, neither does team success. so getting to play for miami doesnt give winslow bonus points or anything.

jokic is far out playing winslow this year.


Mentioned by who? You? If Jokic makes the all rookie team, he will have to beat out Porzingis.

Why would he have to beat out Porzingis? Positions don't matter.

I think the all rookie first team is set 1-4 -- Towns, Russell, Okafor, Porzingis... then we will see from there who gets the last spot.
Bet on yourself and believe in yourself if everybody doesn't believe in you. F--k everybody else. What do they know? If you have a passion and you want to put the work into something, then chase it. If it means something to you, chase it.

- Kevin Garnett
User avatar
Kabookalu
RealGM
Posts: 63,103
And1: 70,115
Joined: Aug 18, 2006
Location: Long Beach, California

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#424 » by Kabookalu » Sun Mar 6, 2016 6:24 am

The thing that's surprised me about Towns is his scoring ability. I didn't think he'd be this good already. From my understanding in college he was more of a defensive player with the ability to knock down shots, hence the Ibaka comparisons. Right now he's looking like some freak hybrid of Garnett and Duncan.
Read on Twitter
wablty
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,940
And1: 1,099
Joined: Jun 18, 2012

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#425 » by wablty » Sun Mar 6, 2016 7:10 am

Choker wrote:The thing that's surprised me about Towns is his scoring ability. I didn't think he'd be this good already. From my understanding in college he was more of a defensive player with the ability to knock down shots, hence the Ibaka comparisons. Right now he's looking like some freak hybrid of Garnett and Duncan.


I don't think anyone expected him to be able to take people off the dribble and he does it pretty consistently. We knew he was working on his post game and figured there'd be a bit there, and we were told he could shoot it a bit. We didn't know he had a handle for a 7 footer. Obviously he won't be playing point center anytime soon, but he'll beat most 4's and 5's in the league to the rim if they come out to defend the jumper and if they don't, he buries it consistently. The damned if you do, damned if you don't aspect of his game 15-20' from the basket is a surprise.
User avatar
Zeitgeister
General Manager
Posts: 8,785
And1: 7,584
Joined: Nov 11, 2008
   

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#426 » by Zeitgeister » Sun Mar 6, 2016 7:22 am

wablty wrote:
Choker wrote:The thing that's surprised me about Towns is his scoring ability. I didn't think he'd be this good already. From my understanding in college he was more of a defensive player with the ability to knock down shots, hence the Ibaka comparisons. Right now he's looking like some freak hybrid of Garnett and Duncan.


I don't think anyone expected him to be able to take people off the dribble and he does it pretty consistently. We knew he was working on his post game and figured there'd be a bit there, and we were told he could shoot it a bit. We didn't know he had a handle for a 7 footer. Obviously he won't be playing point center anytime soon, but he'll beat most 4's and 5's in the league to the rim if they come out to defend the jumper and if they don't, he buries it consistently. The damned if you do, damned if you don't aspect of his game 15-20' from the basket is a surprise.


I would say by game 2, where he dropped something like 28 points against Denver, I was pretty sure this guy could be a special scorer. He was taking them off the dribble, coming off screens, scoring in such a variety of ways. But I had an idea of the handle after I saw that draft express workout video.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkK1xY3xSkc[/youtube]

This video shocked me because I was so surprised not only by how agile he looked but also his handle looked so good for a center. I know it's easy to be dismissive of workout videos but there was an obvious, and rare talent on display. Not to mention he was drilling threes over and over in the video, that didn't hurt.
Lenin wrote: All over the world, wherever there are capitalists, freedom of the press means freedom to buy up newspapers, to buy writers, to bribe, buy and fake "public opinion" for the benefit of the bourgeoisie.
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,353
And1: 30,652
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#427 » by Domejandro » Sun Mar 6, 2016 9:21 am

I believe Karl-Anthony Towns is the first player twenty years old or younger to post (get ready for this obscure cut-off) 28 Points, 7 Assists, 6 Rebounds, 3 Blocks, and 2 Steals. When you exclude the steals, only Josh Smith, and Lamar Odom had reached the cutoff.

http://bkref.com/tiny/ag7tm
Revived
RealGM
Posts: 37,451
And1: 22,229
Joined: Feb 17, 2011

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#428 » by Revived » Sun Mar 6, 2016 9:44 am

Freaking Towns man. I never thought we'll see a player who could be better than Davis so fast but here he is.
User avatar
Westbreezy
Pro Prospect
Posts: 970
And1: 951
Joined: Nov 17, 2012

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#429 » by Westbreezy » Sun Mar 6, 2016 10:02 am

SF88 wrote:Freaking Towns man. I never thought we'll see a player who could be better than Davis so fast but here he is.


And the crazy part is that he was one of the least hyped #1 picks in a while. I (including many, many others) thought at his best he would be a better version of Al Horford which is still really solid in and of itself.

Just goes to show you that we really don't know as much as we think we do
dub81 wrote:Byron had to do one of two things this year: Either win games or develop the youth. Swung and missed wildly on both.

Lakers 2015-16 Season in a Nutshell
Riko
Rookie
Posts: 1,090
And1: 689
Joined: Dec 17, 2015
   

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#430 » by Riko » Sun Mar 6, 2016 10:13 am

cyclix wrote:All rookie First and Second Team so far

First Team
Russell
Booker
Winslow
Porzingis
KAT

Second Team
Mudiay
Hezonja
Johnson
Turner
Okafor


Position doesn't matter. The All-Rookie are pretty much settle:

All Rookie 1st Team
Towns
Porzingis
Booker
Okafor
Russell

All Rookie 2nd Team
Mudiay
Turner
Jokic
Winslow
Johnson
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,019
And1: 22,560
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#431 » by Klomp » Sun Mar 6, 2016 11:12 am

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyTZ1yZQoAQ[/youtube]
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Revived
RealGM
Posts: 37,451
And1: 22,229
Joined: Feb 17, 2011

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#432 » by Revived » Sun Mar 6, 2016 11:14 am

Westbreezy wrote:
SF88 wrote:Freaking Towns man. I never thought we'll see a player who could be better than Davis so fast but here he is.


And the crazy part is that he was one of the least hyped #1 picks in a while. I (including many, many others) thought at his best he would be a better version of Al Horford which is still really solid in and of itself.

Just goes to show you that we really don't know as much as we think we do

Damn straight. I almost hate the TWolves now because I'm jealous that they have Towns, Wiggins and Lavine.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,019
And1: 22,560
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#433 » by Klomp » Sun Mar 6, 2016 11:29 am

SF88 wrote:Damn straight. I almost hate the TWolves now because I'm jealous that they have Towns, Wiggins and Lavine.

After 12 years, we deserve this.

It's just too bad half our fan base is too busy complaining about petty stuff to enjoy this team.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,353
And1: 30,652
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#434 » by Domejandro » Sun Mar 6, 2016 11:29 am

SF88 wrote:
Westbreezy wrote:
SF88 wrote:Freaking Towns man. I never thought we'll see a player who could be better than Davis so fast but here he is.


And the crazy part is that he was one of the least hyped #1 picks in a while. I (including many, many others) thought at his best he would be a better version of Al Horford which is still really solid in and of itself.

Just goes to show you that we really don't know as much as we think we do

Damn straight. I almost hate the TWolves now because I'm jealous that they have Towns, Wiggins and Lavine.

I would put Zach LaVine below Ricky Rubio, Ricky is easily our second best player behind Towns. The dude is a horrible shooter, but he is elite at every other aspect of the game.

I am somewhat iffy on Zach though. If we can hire someone like Tom Thibodeau to help him defensively, the dude could potentially become a monster, like top fifteen in the league at least good. If he does not get someone like Coach Thibodeau, I am really, really concerned with his long-term defense; he just needs the right guy to guide him in the right direction. He is really struggling on that end.

That aside, I understood the sentiment of the post, haha. It has been eleven brutal years, but things are finally falling into place; once Sam Mitchell goes, we are absolutely set.
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,353
And1: 30,652
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#435 » by Domejandro » Sun Mar 6, 2016 11:31 am

Klomp wrote:
SF88 wrote:Damn straight. I almost hate the TWolves now because I'm jealous that they have Towns, Wiggins and Lavine.

After 12 years, we deserve this.

It's just too bad half our fan base is too busy complaining about petty stuff to enjoy this team.

Eh, we are not fun to watch most of the time; poor coaching and lackadaisical effort has really diminished my excitement on this team. That said, Karl Anthony-Towns is worth every single second of bad basketball we have to watch. :lol:
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,019
And1: 22,560
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#436 » by Klomp » Sun Mar 6, 2016 11:38 am

Domejandro wrote:Eh, we are not fun to watch most of the time; poor coaching and lackadaisical effort has really diminished my excitement on this team.

My point exactly. No fan base is 100% happy with their coach. No team gives great effort on every play of every game.

Read our board and you'd think you'd accidentally visited the Nets board. They at least have something to complain about with no present and no future.

Not saying this has been a great or enjoyable team to watch in every game. But even when there's games like this, it's still like pulling teeth to get some excitement and optimism from the fan base, and that's extremely frustrating. A number of other fan bases are jealous of what we have, yet our own fan base is blind to what we have.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,353
And1: 30,652
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#437 » by Domejandro » Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:13 pm

Klomp wrote:
Domejandro wrote:Eh, we are not fun to watch most of the time; poor coaching and lackadaisical effort has really diminished my excitement on this team.

My point exactly. No fan base is 100% happy with their coach. No team gives great effort on every play of every game.

Read our board and you'd think you'd accidentally visited the Nets board. They at least have something to complain about with no present and no future.

Not saying this has been a great or enjoyable team to watch in every game. But even when there's games like this, it's still like pulling teeth to get some excitement and optimism from the fan base, and that's extremely frustrating. A number of other fan bases are jealous of what we have, yet our own fan base is blind to what we have.

You are underrating the level of lackadaisical effort, the team is completely demoralized at this point, and at times look like they have given up. This is not a one-off lack of effort thing, Klomp, Andrew Wiggins is often times completely disengaged from the game!

In addition, the relevance of what other fan-bases feel about their coach is nonexistent. Sam Mitchell is a horrible, horrible coach; he is holding this team back from both a development standpoint AND a winning standpoint. He is awful.

Other fan-bases have good reason to be envious of the young pieces we have, I personally am ecstatic at what has been built; that said, you cannot simply disregard the awful tendencies of this team because it will likely be fixed in the future. People who are irate with Sam Mitchell are frustrated because he is hurting the team's growth and is making the team not fun to watch.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,019
And1: 22,560
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#438 » by Klomp » Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:22 pm

Domejandro wrote:You are underrating the level of lackadaisical effort, the team is completely demoralized at this point, and at times look like they have given up. This is not a one-off lack of effort thing, Klomp, Andrew Wiggins is often times completely disengaged from the game!

Yeah, and those things were evident during last night's game, right?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,353
And1: 30,652
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#439 » by Domejandro » Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:27 pm

Klomp wrote:
Domejandro wrote:You are underrating the level of lackadaisical effort, the team is completely demoralized at this point, and at times look like they have given up. This is not a one-off lack of effort thing, Klomp, Andrew Wiggins is often times completely disengaged from the game!

Yeah, and those things were evident during last night's game, right?

Klomp, this kind of straw-man-esque logic is why I have chosen to avoid the Minnesota forum, it is painful. Minnesota played great against Brooklyn, duh, but does that completely negate the rest of the season? Nobody is complaining about last night, the team played well. That said, Andrew Wiggins and the rest of the team have absolutely had issues with their effort level throughout the season; Wiggins in particular has been lazy in multiple games. That does not mean I hate him, it simply means I see a major flaw that I wish to see addressed.

I am still bamboozled at how last night should make any other game irrelevant.

I am going to bow out of this debate, I don't wish to spam the Rookie Thread anymore, and I have already explained my position on the Minnesota board extensively. :lol:
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,019
And1: 22,560
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#440 » by Klomp » Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:39 pm

I don't want to hijack this thread, but I'm not calling for last night to make everything irrelevant. I just think people get too caught up in the now of another likely 50+ loss season that we aren't looking at what we have.

-Three 20-year olds leading the team in scoring (has that ever been done)
-The possible unanimous ROY
-A top-5 draft pick
-A bunch of cap space

Yet we're too focused on what we don't have. Sam's not a good enough coach, Ricky's not a top-5 PG, Wiggins not an elite defender or rebounder yet, etc. I don't disagree with any of those statements, but I don't let them be my entire mindset of the franchise.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment

Return to The General Board