CelticsLV wrote:Hield is Lillard 2.0
I love Hield, but he doesn't have near the handle that Lillard has. Very different players.
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

CelticsLV wrote:Hield is Lillard 2.0
Smitty731 wrote:CelticsLV wrote:Hield is Lillard 2.0
I love Hield, but he doesn't have near the handle that Lillard has. Very different players.
Cornbread wrote:return2glory wrote:Just think about the possibilities of a starting lineup next year of:
SF: Crowder
PF: Durant
C: Horford
SG: Hield
PG: Thomas
Bench: Turner, Bradley, Smart, Sully, KO, Mickey, and two other # 1 picks.
If we get Horford and Hield, there is a good chance Durant comes.
And that chance will have nothing to do with Hield.
return2glory wrote:Cornbread wrote:return2glory wrote:Just think about the possibilities of a starting lineup next year of:
SF: Crowder
PF: Durant
C: Horford
SG: Hield
PG: Thomas
Bench: Turner, Bradley, Smart, Sully, KO, Mickey, and two other # 1 picks.
If we get Horford and Hield, there is a good chance Durant comes.
And that chance will have nothing to do with Hield.
I disagree. A player like Durant who is a student of the game will be taking notice of what Hield has been done all year and in the Tourny.
Hield is more NBA ready than Simmons and Ingrid.
It will mostly likely take a top 3 pick to land Hield. If we are able to draft Hield and also land Horford, then that increases the chances of Durant coming here. TD knows we already have an all-star PG, an improving player in Crowder, one of the top 3 coaches in the league.
We are already a playoff team. Adding arguable the best college player this year in Hield and adding an all-star player like Horford makes the Celtics a top 2 team in the East. With KD, we become the best team in the East. I'm not saying we are for sure getting KD, but adding these type of pieces makes it easier for KD to come aboard.
robbie84 wrote:return2glory wrote:Cornbread wrote:
And that chance will have nothing to do with Hield.
I disagree. A player like Durant who is a student of the game will be taking notice of what Hield has been done all year and in the Tourny.
Hield is more NBA ready than Simmons and Ingrid.
It will mostly likely take a top 3 pick to land Hield. If we are able to draft Hield and also land Horford, then that increases the chances of Durant coming here. TD knows we already have an all-star PG, an improving player in Crowder, one of the top 3 coaches in the league.
We are already a playoff team. Adding arguable the best college player this year in Hield and adding an all-star player like Horford makes the Celtics a top 2 team in the East. With KD, we become the best team in the East. I'm not saying we are for sure getting KD, but adding these type of pieces makes it easier for KD to come aboard.
Hield never starts over Bradley. Bradley's defense would be more valuable than Hield's offense as a rookie.
Hield's obviously a better offensive player overall, but he's not quite an NBA caliber defender yet.
Having Hield on our team as a rookie as zero impact on Durant's decision to come to Boston or not. Literally zero.
I agree that Hield is awesome though, just not that kind of awesome.
DK-All Day wrote:No thanks to Buddy. He doesn't have the handle to be more than a spot up shooter as a role player in the NBA. Defenses will expose him in the NBA. He'll be a JJ Reddick type more than a Ray Allen.
Great college player, but people will be dissapointed if you spend a top 10 pick on him.
DK-All Day wrote:No thanks to Buddy. He doesn't have the handle to be more than a spot up shooter as a role player in the NBA. Defenses will expose him in the NBA. He'll be a JJ Reddick type more than a Ray Allen.
Great college player, but people will be dissapointed if you spend a top 10 pick on him.
return2glory wrote:robbie84 wrote:return2glory wrote:
I disagree. A player like Durant who is a student of the game will be taking notice of what Hield has been done all year and in the Tourny.
Hield is more NBA ready than Simmons and Ingrid.
It will mostly likely take a top 3 pick to land Hield. If we are able to draft Hield and also land Horford, then that increases the chances of Durant coming here. TD knows we already have an all-star PG, an improving player in Crowder, one of the top 3 coaches in the league.
We are already a playoff team. Adding arguable the best college player this year in Hield and adding an all-star player like Horford makes the Celtics a top 2 team in the East. With KD, we become the best team in the East. I'm not saying we are for sure getting KD, but adding these type of pieces makes it easier for KD to come aboard.
Hield never starts over Bradley. Bradley's defense would be more valuable than Hield's offense as a rookie.
Hield's obviously a better offensive player overall, but he's not quite an NBA caliber defender yet.
Having Hield on our team as a rookie as zero impact on Durant's decision to come to Boston or not. Literally zero.
I agree that Hield is awesome though, just not that kind of awesome.
Saying Hield will never start over Bradley is your opinion. When I was calling Thomas one of the best PGs in the East most of you were calling Thomas to come off the bench.
Hield will have a chance to be an all-star. Bradley, not so much.

robbie84 wrote:Wonder if Danny would trade the #2 pick for #3 or #4 plus a stud (ie Okafur+#4 for our #2).
mbsnmisc wrote:I think the New Orleans pick has the possibility to be a pick that could be "had". We all know the Pelicans issues, ( No depth, small market, sketchy ownership/management ). Their management comes from a NFL background, as a general rule they tend to favor quantity over quality. I think an offer of Boston first, Dallas first and Philadelphia second for New Orleans first, (around 7),would get laughed at by most GM's. I am not sure about Demps.
It would be tremendous to get Ingram and Hield or package a top three and another top seven pick with some of our young players for a true star.
Probably wishful thinking, but I don't think it is impossible.