Manocad wrote:313 Professor wrote:Billl wrote:I don't see how this is even a question. Yes, he makes lots of bad decisions through the course of a game, but they guy is clutch. Some switch goes on in his head and he just lights it up.
If want to ask "can the pistons be contenders if their 2 best players are inconsistent", that is really a separate question.
If Reggie Jackson is 2 for 15 from the field, and the game is tied 96-96, and he hits a 3 at the buzzer for a game winner.... is that clutch? What about those 13 possessions he bricked away, potentially the turnovers, and the possessions where he stalled the offense and we got a bad shot? Is all just forgotten? Lol
The "switch" might be "Man I've sucked! I gotta do something.... my job is on the line! SVG might bench me!"
Clutch is the ability to hit the shot when the game is on the line. The game wasn't on the line while RJ was 2-13 and the game wound up being tied at 96; since the game was tied you can't say that RJ's 2-13 lost the game as the game isn't lost yet. Clutch is about performance at a particular point in the game, not performance during the whole game.
By definition sure, but the word "clutch" has a VERY positive connotation. In that example by definition yes he hit a clutch shot, but if he does this 4 games in a row (which to a lesser extreme is what Reggie has done) he doesn't deserve all the perks that come with being considered a clutch player. He's truly making up for his bad performances with good endings.... a.k.a. saving his job in quite a few games. I might log them when I have time.
Calling a player clutch is one of the biggest compliments in sports.