ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread - Part XXX

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,565
And1: 1,992
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1661 » by gambitx777 » Tue Apr 5, 2016 9:01 pm

nate33 wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:
nate33 wrote:If they offered a mid first round pick for Beal, I'd make the trade without hesitation (assuming Beal was insisting on a max contract).

People have gotten decent hauls for sign and trades before. they have lie what 4 picks in this draft, they could toss two in and be ok. that would be a good deal for us! for sure. I think noel might even be an option. Philly would be the best trade partner for us for beal.

Not for sub-max caliber players who got max contracts.

The last time I recall a team trade for a max contract of a non-elite player and include picks in the transaction was when Denver traded for Kenyon Martin. That was about 14 years ago.

Well i don't devalue the fact that Philly might be one of the most desperate teams in the league this summer, they need some star power, and even if beal is not a true star yet, they don't have a ton of other options. Plus if beal is offered full max from philly and the wiz don't want to match but will just to keep him from walking and philly is willing to play ball, it benefits everyone involved !
We get beal off our books and get a little something for him, philly get's their guy and beal gets full 5 year max.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,634
And1: 23,106
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1662 » by nate33 » Tue Apr 5, 2016 9:05 pm

gambitx777 wrote:
nate33 wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:People have gotten decent hauls for sign and trades before. they have lie what 4 picks in this draft, they could toss two in and be ok. that would be a good deal for us! for sure. I think noel might even be an option. Philly would be the best trade partner for us for beal.

Not for sub-max caliber players who got max contracts.

The last time I recall a team trade for a max contract of a non-elite player and include picks in the transaction was when Denver traded for Kenyon Martin. That was about 14 years ago.

Well i don't devalue the fact that Philly might be one of the most desperate teams in the league this summer, they need some star power, and even if beal is not a true star yet, they don't have a ton of other options. Plus if beal is offered full max from philly and the wiz don't want to match but will just to keep him from walking and philly is willing to play ball, it benefits everyone involved !
We get beal off our books and get a little something for him, philly get's their guy and beal gets full 5 year max.

As I said, I'd make that deal. I just consider it highly unlikely. I don't see Philly pulling the trigger no matter how desperate you believe they are.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,877
And1: 9,238
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1663 » by payitforward » Tue Apr 5, 2016 9:27 pm

jivelikenice wrote:Why would you want to get rid of Morris? 13.6ppg and 6.3 rpg while shooting 50% from the field and 38% from 3 in 28 mpg in his 18 starts. That while acclimating to a new team and only slated to earn 7.4MM next year.

Its fair not to like why they had to or that the did trade for Markieff but the player himself has been solid since coming to Washington.

No. Not solid. Why don't you look at his numbers per 40 minutes, and compare them to an average NBA PF? That should change your mind.
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,887
And1: 1,062
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1664 » by The Consiglieri » Tue Apr 5, 2016 10:37 pm

I just hope those of you with tickets just stop attending, maybe sell them to rival fans. At this point if ownership has so little interest or empathy with the fan base, or winning that they'll bring this three time loser (in DC alone) back for another walk the plank year where he can sell of the future to save his own arse for a third time, ownership deserves to see an empty arena filled with only a scattering of fans from the visiting of side. Make this humiliating for this -------, totally humiliating, this kind of horror is the only thing that can save us from Dumb and Dumber II running this franchise into even deeper layers of the ground beyond what Snyderatto accomplished with the Redskins.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,565
And1: 1,992
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1665 » by gambitx777 » Wed Apr 6, 2016 5:24 am

nate33 wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:
nate33 wrote:Not for sub-max caliber players who got max contracts.

The last time I recall a team trade for a max contract of a non-elite player and include picks in the transaction was when Denver traded for Kenyon Martin. That was about 14 years ago.

Well i don't devalue the fact that Philly might be one of the most desperate teams in the league this summer, they need some star power, and even if beal is not a true star yet, they don't have a ton of other options. Plus if beal is offered full max from philly and the wiz don't want to match but will just to keep him from walking and philly is willing to play ball, it benefits everyone involved !
We get beal off our books and get a little something for him, philly get's their guy and beal gets full 5 year max.

As I said, I'd make that deal. I just consider it highly unlikely. I don't see Philly pulling the trigger no matter how desperate you believe they are.

fair and valid opinion. I guess we will wait and see. And hope because I'm sure all of us can agree that getting rid of beal some how is better than maxing him out.
payitforward wrote:No. Not solid. Why don't you look at his numbers per 40 minutes, and compare them to an average NBA PF? That should change your mind.

I don't want to start this fight. but I really diss like per 40 stats. I think the per game and totals have just as much if not more validity in an argument.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,877
And1: 9,238
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1666 » by payitforward » Wed Apr 6, 2016 8:29 pm

gambitx777 wrote:
payitforward wrote:No. Not solid. Why don't you look at his numbers per 40 minutes, and compare them to an average NBA PF? That should change your mind.

I don't want to start this fight. but I really diss like per 40 stats. I think the per game and totals have just as much if not more validity in an argument.

No, there's nothing to fight about here. The value of per 40 stats over per game stats is only that they give you some way to compare players who log different numbers of minutes.

E.g. Markieff has played @26 minutes/game for us. Do you want me to compare his per-game rebounding numbers to e.g. Paul Millsap, who plays 25% more minutes? Doesn't seem fair to him.

Obviously shooting %s are not affected by a per-minute adjustment.

Edit: One admitted problem w/ per-minute stats is that they can make it look like a guy who has a very small sample size of numbers has done more than he really has. Even in Markieff's case, he's only played @800 minutes for us. If his numbers were radically better or worse than his career averages, it would be hard to place any trust in them. But they're not.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,877
And1: 9,238
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1667 » by payitforward » Wed Apr 6, 2016 8:35 pm

Note that Markieff's per game numbers aren't good either. Obviously. If his per 40 numbers aren't good, his per game numbers can't be good either.
llcc25
Senior
Posts: 532
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 13, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1668 » by llcc25 » Thu Apr 7, 2016 12:35 pm

If we decide to blow things up, how bout his trade:

Wall, gortat, filler for dragic, whiteside, Winslow?
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,634
And1: 23,106
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1669 » by nate33 » Thu Apr 7, 2016 1:13 pm

llcc25 wrote:If we decide to blow things up, how bout his trade:

Wall, gortat, filler for dragic, whiteside, Winslow?

Terrible.

Whiteside is an unrestricted free agent and can be had for free, so this is just Wall for Dragic and Winslow. Dragic is 30 and not very good. Winslow isn't any better than Porter.

If we're going to trade Wall, we need to trade him for a really good young player or a high lotto pick. Derrick Favors is one of the few targets that might make sense for both teams.
llcc25
Senior
Posts: 532
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 13, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1670 » by llcc25 » Thu Apr 7, 2016 1:51 pm

Exum, favors and #1, for for wal and Morris? We can have them throw in lyles or hood.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,634
And1: 23,106
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1671 » by nate33 » Thu Apr 7, 2016 2:13 pm

llcc25 wrote:Exum, favors and #1, for for wal and Morris? We can have them throw in lyles or hood.

I would do that without Lyles or Hood.
thricethefun
Junior
Posts: 340
And1: 46
Joined: Feb 15, 2013

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1672 » by thricethefun » Thu Apr 7, 2016 2:19 pm

nate33 wrote:
llcc25 wrote:Exum, favors and #1, for for wal and Morris? We can have them throw in lyles or hood.

I would do that without Lyles or Hood.


Are you serious? Favors will never be as good as Wall and Exum and the draft pick are unknowns. That would be extremely foolish. If they wanted Wall i'd ask for Gobert, Hayward and a pick
User avatar
TheSecretWeapon
RealGM
Posts: 17,122
And1: 877
Joined: May 29, 2001
Location: Milliways
Contact:
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1673 » by TheSecretWeapon » Thu Apr 7, 2016 3:46 pm

thricethefun wrote:
nate33 wrote:
llcc25 wrote:Exum, favors and #1, for for wal and Morris? We can have them throw in lyles or hood.

I would do that without Lyles or Hood.


Are you serious? Favors will never be as good as Wall and Exum and the draft pick are unknowns. That would be extremely foolish. If they wanted Wall i'd ask for Gobert, Hayward and a pick

Favors is already better than Wall.
"A lot of what we call talent is the desire to practice."
-- Malcolm Gladwell

Check out my blog about the Wizards, movies, writing, music, TV, sports, and whatever else comes to mind.
CobraCommander
RealGM
Posts: 25,531
And1: 16,633
Joined: May 01, 2014
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1674 » by CobraCommander » Thu Apr 7, 2016 4:53 pm

TheSecretWeapon wrote:
thricethefun wrote:
nate33 wrote:I would do that without Lyles or Hood.


Are you serious? Favors will never be as good as Wall and Exum and the draft pick are unknowns. That would be extremely foolish. If they wanted Wall i'd ask for Gobert, Hayward and a pick

Favors is already better than Wall.



All of the people that would trade Wall - it better be for a younger all star or much better older player. Because it would take Lebron or Durant to make this poorly configured team better. The person that would trade for Whiteside--- Miami isn't sure they will resign him because of his maturity but we would trade Wall for that? This board appears to be full of trolls or people that don't know basketball... Favors? Exum? D.Russell, etc... JW is 25/26- Beal and Porter 22. KO 20? The rest of the team should be trade bait but those 4- if we can't win with those pieces it's not the players, it's the org. Give Boston or Spurs or any competent coach wall, beal and porter- they would be able to do more than us. KO is an unknown still but he has talent.

The person that put up the Whiteside trade should be on TrollWatch. Or they don't read or watch Miami basketball because we could get him without a trade.
CobraCommander
RealGM
Posts: 25,531
And1: 16,633
Joined: May 01, 2014
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1675 » by CobraCommander » Thu Apr 7, 2016 4:59 pm

nate33 wrote:
llcc25 wrote:If we decide to blow things up, how bout his trade:

Wall, gortat, filler for dragic, whiteside, Winslow?

Terrible.

Whiteside is an unrestricted free agent and can be had for free, so this is just Wall for Dragic and Winslow. Dragic is 30 and not very good. Winslow isn't any better than Porter.

If we're going to trade Wall, we need to trade him for a really good young player or a high lotto pick. Derrick Favors is one of the few targets that might make sense for both teams.


Come on Nate- Favors for Wall? Let's look at their careers in 2 years. I know the wall flaws- but you are projecting big time with Favors. He could end being Sheldon Mack
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,877
And1: 9,238
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1676 » by payitforward » Thu Apr 7, 2016 5:11 pm

CobraCommander wrote:
nate33 wrote:
llcc25 wrote:If we decide to blow things up, how bout his trade:

Wall, gortat, filler for dragic, whiteside, Winslow?

Terrible.

Whiteside is an unrestricted free agent and can be had for free, so this is just Wall for Dragic and Winslow. Dragic is 30 and not very good. Winslow isn't any better than Porter.

If we're going to trade Wall, we need to trade him for a really good young player or a high lotto pick. Derrick Favors is one of the few targets that might make sense for both teams.

Come on Nate- Favors for Wall? Let's look at their careers in 2 years. I know the wall flaws- but you are projecting big time with Favors. He could end being Sheldon Mack

First off, how we can trade for Whiteside? We're past the deadline, and as soon as the season ends he's a FA.

How can Favors end up being Sheldon Mack, I wonder?
llcc25
Senior
Posts: 532
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 13, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1677 » by llcc25 » Thu Apr 7, 2016 5:51 pm

Sorry cobra and Nate, I forgot whiteside was unrestricted so that trade I agree doesn't make sense. And I'm no wall troll. He's the best and most valuable trade trip we got but it's clear to be that although good/very good, he will never be great. He doesn't do the little things when we need to. His defense and decision making, finishing at rim, hasn't improved so I'm willing to move him IF he team can get better. I think it's arguable that the favors, Exum, #1pick and hood or lyles for wall and Morris does that. Favors immediately upgrades our PF position on both ends but more importNtly it fits well w gortat. Secondly, Exum and utahs pick which could be used to take Ulis who calipari said was his best ever floor general is nice consolation at PG. and then add to that lyles or hood I do think it makes us no worse than this year and builds toward the future. I'm willing to take a step back one year to take two steps forward and I think this trade possibly does that. With wall I know what we have- a team that will battle for 7/8 in east. Thats not good enough for me.
pcbothwel
Head Coach
Posts: 6,246
And1: 2,807
Joined: Jun 12, 2010
     

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1678 » by pcbothwel » Thu Apr 7, 2016 6:09 pm

CobraCommander wrote:
nate33 wrote:
llcc25 wrote:If we decide to blow things up, how bout his trade:

Wall, gortat, filler for dragic, whiteside, Winslow?

Terrible.

Whiteside is an unrestricted free agent and can be had for free, so this is just Wall for Dragic and Winslow. Dragic is 30 and not very good. Winslow isn't any better than Porter.

If we're going to trade Wall, we need to trade him for a really good young player or a high lotto pick. Derrick Favors is one of the few targets that might make sense for both teams.


Come on Nate- Favors for Wall? Let's look at their careers in 2 years. I know the wall flaws- but you are projecting big time with Favors. He could end being Sheldon Mack


I think he was referring to Exum, but said Favors
CobraCommander
RealGM
Posts: 25,531
And1: 16,633
Joined: May 01, 2014
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1679 » by CobraCommander » Fri Apr 8, 2016 2:25 am

llcc25 wrote:Sorry cobra and Nate, I forgot whiteside was unrestricted so that trade I agree doesn't make sense. And I'm no wall troll. He's the best and most valuable trade trip we got but it's clear to be that although good/very good, he will never be great. He doesn't do the little things when we need to. His defense and decision making, finishing at rim, hasn't improved so I'm willing to move him IF he team can get better. I think it's arguable that the favors, Exum, #1pick and hood or lyles for wall and Morris does that. Favors immediately upgrades our PF position on both ends but more importNtly it fits well w gortat. Secondly, Exum and utahs pick which could be used to take Ulis who calipari said was his best ever floor general is nice consolation at PG. and then add to that lyles or hood I do think it makes us no worse than this year and builds toward the future. I'm willing to take a step back one year to take two steps forward and I think this trade possibly does that. With wall I know what we have- a team that will battle for 7/8 in east. Thats not good enough for me.


Your argument makes no sense... If you are simply saying trade Wall for a better player that makes the Wizards Better right now. Then you win...you will get no argument there. But the same can be said for Lillard, Durant, Lebron, Paul, and Curry- Yes trade them for some one that makes your team better immediately.

But if you suggest that The Wizards trade their best player that is avg 20 & 10 at 25 years old and is a bargin under the new salary cap for another player that you suggest will make the Wiz better immediately because this other player will at some point in the future be "great"...I say to you that you are truly a wishful thinker and a disciple of Hienke and Grufeld. Yes mortage the present and the future for some distant future dream of something great... Yes good call- like Erine didn't improve the team last offseason in hopes of pulling Durant this offseason by hiring his highschool coach or how the 76ers kept drafting the "best player available" and stockpiling picks in hopes that one of them would GREAT instead of building a team with those picks that could play together (now they got 3 big men that play the same position...moderately)

Your assessment that Wall will never be great while not explaining how you know any of these other guys will be great is illogical. At 25 Wall may not be a top 3 point guard but ALL NBA pundits have him anywhere from 3-7 with 2 guys that are in the discussion Lowery 30 and Paul 30 being on the other side of 30 (also known as in your prime) while Wall and Lillard are the youngest in the best point guard discussion at 25. Portland wouldn't dream of trading Lillard even though by all accounts Lillard was harder to play for most of his team mates last year than Wall because he was a shoot first point guard and many of the fans blame him for Aldridge leaving.

You also are saying someone fits well with Gortat? And you said Gortat and the word future in the same post- that's cute. I love the Polish Hammer - Great Guy - good team guy but he is a 32 year old career 10 point and 7 rebound guy. Last year he was 13 and 9 and this year he is 12 and 9- do you think he will be significantly better next year because he is playing with a new point guard and PF and 33 years old? You also said that you are willing to take a step back for the next two years if it makes us significantly better in the future. And again you are suggesting trading WALL at 25 so you can get a guy that (as you put it...more importantly) PAIRS well with Gortat who will be 33 next year...wow :banghead:

You also said with Wall we will battle for 7/8 for the next couple years and that's not good enough for you...like Wall is playing by himself. Most of the good teams build around their best player especially if that best player takes accountability when he does wrong, is coachable by all accounts, stays out of trouble, is young, stays relatively healthy, an all star 3 times by 25, one of the best at his position, a bargin based on the salary cap and is liked by the fans.

Since making the playoffs isn't good enough for you I would like to remind you that- that most people believe only 3 teams have a chance this year. Cleveland, GS and San Antonio. So this year you need 1 MVP level and two great players to compete for a ring (Cleveland and GS) or the the best coach in the league with an amazing system, 3 HOFers and two of the best players in the league (San Antonio). The rest of the league is playing for 4th- OKC could be playing for a ring if they kept Harden...they would have 3 MVP level guys but they gave up on Harden for cash considerations and the PLAYERs voted HARDEN their MVP last year...oops - I bet if OKC could do it over they would have kept the Beard---but I digress.

These are my points-
1: If making the playoffs isn't enough- none of the guys you named are going to make the wiz a title contender.

2: you can't talk future while trading a 25 year old 3 time MVP for someone even younger and unproven while talking about how someone would pair well with your 32 year old center

3:If you need a big 3 to compete for a title- Wall is at very least a piece of a big 3 (especially if Kyrie is considered that in Cleveland) and if you trade him for another point you have just traded out or even upgraded your point guard...you are in a relatively similar situation after the trade (even if you traded for 25 year old Chris Paul...who remains ringless at 30). Unless you go get Curry for Wall we ain't competing for a ring and I don't even think Curry could get this team through a healthy Cleveland with this roster. So what's the point of that??

4: Pop ain't walking through that door and as long as we have Wittless and Erine - Wall will have to brute force it to get us to 9th in the east because the East is MUCH BETTER this year and will be better next year. If we don't keep Wall and get 2 other great players and a coach...its down hill from here. But don't worry Wall will be demanding a trade by Christmas because why wouldn't he..and we can go back to the pre-Wall good ole days when this franchise was dominating the league.

5: your "blowing it up" trade for Dragic (30 year old overpaid and horribly over rated - Goran is a career 12pt 4.5 assist guy but he did have that carreer year in that CONTRACT YEAR...20 and 6 and then promptly back to 16 and 4 the next) Whiteside (young, talented and uncoachable...remember we tried that and it sucks) and Winslow (unproven) would clearly make the wiz better because that team without good coaching and DWade would be better than 10 in the east (laughable!)

Or we can go out there get a coach, a GM and try to surround Wall with some young players that can stay healthy and by the time Wall 27 maybe we are competing for something significant.

the Wiz are doomed until we get a new GM and Coach... Unless Durant just decides to come here because...he is crazy.

Btw- I can tell you study at the foot of Skip Bayless :)
CobraCommander
RealGM
Posts: 25,531
And1: 16,633
Joined: May 01, 2014
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXX 

Post#1680 » by CobraCommander » Fri Apr 8, 2016 2:26 am

pcbothwel wrote:
CobraCommander wrote:
nate33 wrote:Terrible.

Whiteside is an unrestricted free agent and can be had for free, so this is just Wall for Dragic and Winslow. Dragic is 30 and not very good. Winslow isn't any better than Porter.

If we're going to trade Wall, we need to trade him for a really good young player or a high lotto pick. Derrick Favors is one of the few targets that might make sense for both teams.


Come on Nate- Favors for Wall? Let's look at their careers in 2 years. I know the wall flaws- but you are projecting big time with Favors. He could end being Sheldon Mack


I think he was referring to Exum, but said Favors


Either way I think it's a bad call...but I respect Nate cause he has been bringing it for years.

Return to Washington Wizards