What makes the 2016 Warriors any better than the 1997 Bulls?

Moderators: KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Dirk, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27

Rupert Murdoch
Starter
Posts: 2,020
And1: 1,906
Joined: May 05, 2009

What makes the 2016 Warriors any better than the 1997 Bulls? 

Post#1 » by Rupert Murdoch » Sat Apr 9, 2016 3:45 pm

People are comparing them to the 1996 Bulls because of the record but they are statistically much more comparable to the 1997 Bulls.

2016 Warriors

Average Point Differential: 10.8 PPG
SRS: 10.34
Off RTG: 114.6 (1st in NBA)
Def RTG: 103.8 (5th in NBA)

1997 Bulls

Average Point Differential: 10.8 PPG
SRS: 10.70
Off RTG: 114.4 (1st in NBA)
Def RTG: 102.4 (4th in NBA)

The average point differential and offensive rating is virtually identical but the '97 Bulls had a better SRS and defensive rating. They were just as good if not slightly better than this year's Warriors team.
User avatar
rumdiary
Starter
Posts: 2,197
And1: 776
Joined: Dec 06, 2005
   

Re: What makes the 2016 Warriors any better than the 1997 Bulls? 

Post#2 » by rumdiary » Sat Apr 9, 2016 3:58 pm

Who cares which one was better really? They're both two of the most entertaining and dominating teams in NBA history and I'm really glad to have grown up with the Bulls and now I get to watch the Warriors.
Image
Warriorfan
RealGM
Posts: 15,357
And1: 2,801
Joined: Jun 24, 2001
         

Re: What makes the 2016 Warriors any better than the 1997 Bulls? 

Post#3 » by Warriorfan » Sat Apr 9, 2016 4:03 pm

1997 Bulls are better unless GS repeats.
User avatar
WarriorsEFC
Rookie
Posts: 1,133
And1: 1,111
Joined: Mar 29, 2015

Re: What makes the 2016 Warriors any better than the 1997 Bulls? 

Post#4 » by WarriorsEFC » Sat Apr 9, 2016 4:05 pm

Why can't we just say the Bulls were the best of their era and the Warriors are the best of this era?
73-9 - GTOAT.
User avatar
mihail_petkov
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,451
And1: 1,433
Joined: Jun 23, 2011

Re: What makes the 2016 Warriors any better than the 1997 Bulls? 

Post#5 » by mihail_petkov » Sat Apr 9, 2016 4:25 pm

I think that Warriors ORTG and DRTG are not accurate to real number because during 1/4 of the season their starters didn't play in the whole forth quarter + a few other quarters where they played only 3-4 minutes. Then their bench kill the difference every time when they come to the floor in already decided games.
PierceFan4ever
RealGM
Posts: 35,807
And1: 41,925
Joined: Dec 17, 2011

Re: What makes the 2016 Warriors any better than the 1997 Bulls? 

Post#6 » by PierceFan4ever » Sat Apr 9, 2016 4:35 pm

Well, I don't think the Warriors are better than either the 96 or 97 Bulls it just they're compared to the 96 Bulls because of the regular season record
JonFromVA
RealGM
Posts: 15,363
And1: 5,089
Joined: Dec 08, 2009
     

Re: What makes the 2016 Warriors any better than the 1997 Bulls? 

Post#7 » by JonFromVA » Sat Apr 9, 2016 4:39 pm

mihail_petkov wrote:I think that Warriors ORTG and DRTG are not accurate to real number because during 1/4 of the season their starters didn't play in the whole forth quarter + a few other quarters where they played only 3-4 minutes. Then their bench kill the difference every time when they come to the floor in already decided games.


This is typical, though, and the W's have a pretty good bench that at least will hold leads.
JonFromVA
RealGM
Posts: 15,363
And1: 5,089
Joined: Dec 08, 2009
     

Re: What makes the 2016 Warriors any better than the 1997 Bulls? 

Post#8 » by JonFromVA » Sat Apr 9, 2016 4:40 pm

WarriorsEFC wrote:Why can't we just say the Bulls were the best of their era and the Warriors are the best of this era?


Bingo... but even that's too early to say. Best team has to win the championship!
PizzaSteve
Veteran
Posts: 2,675
And1: 1,837
Joined: May 05, 2015
     

Re: What makes the 2016 Warriors any better than the 1997 Bulls? 

Post#9 » by PizzaSteve » Sat Apr 9, 2016 4:41 pm

Why do we have a compulsion to rank or compare different teams that are not actually in competition with each other? I think it is our tribal human nature that influences our thinking. We seem doomed to need to form tribes, associate with our tribe and then both within and without, create a hierarchy. Silly stuff.

Which is better, a beautiful, perfect red rose that bloomed in 1980 or a gorgeous, colorful orchid grown in 2016? Neither. Both are perfectly pleasurable to observe. WarriorsEFC, has it right, as quoted above. (In my opinion)
KyletheDingbat
Veteran
Posts: 2,768
And1: 1,687
Joined: Jun 15, 2010

Re: What makes the 2016 Warriors any better than the 1997 Bulls? 

Post#10 » by KyletheDingbat » Sat Apr 9, 2016 4:50 pm

PizzaSteve wrote:Why do we have a compulsion to rank or compare different teams that are not actually in competition with each other? I think it is our tribal human nature that influences our thinking. We seem doomed to need to form tribes, associate with our tribe and then both within and without, create a hierarchy. Silly stuff.

Which is better, a beautiful, perfect red rose that bloomed in 1980 or a gorgeous, colorful orchid grown in 2016? Neither. Both are perfectly pleasurable to observe. WarriorsEFC, has it right, as quoted above. (In my opinion)

BORING!

97 Bulls FTW. Rodman gets Green ejected in all four games of the sweep. Jordan gets sick of this 'Curry is the GOAT shooter' noise and decides to hit 10 first half 3's, and then instead of a shrug, he grabs his D and shoves his tongue out at Steph. Pippen leaves the games with headaches and Kerr hits the championship winning jumper and cries in sorrow.
User avatar
mihail_petkov
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,451
And1: 1,433
Joined: Jun 23, 2011

Re: What makes the 2016 Warriors any better than the 1997 Bulls? 

Post#11 » by mihail_petkov » Sat Apr 9, 2016 4:51 pm

JonFromVA wrote:
mihail_petkov wrote:I think that Warriors ORTG and DRTG are not accurate to real number because during 1/4 of the season their starters didn't play in the whole forth quarter + a few other quarters where they played only 3-4 minutes. Then their bench kill the difference every time when they come to the floor in already decided games.


This is typical, though, and the W's have a pretty good bench that at least will hold leads.

I am not sure how to check but I am sure their bench is negative in all blowouts.
User avatar
Dominator83
RealGM
Posts: 21,581
And1: 33,091
Joined: Jan 16, 2005
Location: NBA Hell

Re: What makes the 2016 Warriors any better than the 1997 Bulls? 

Post#12 » by Dominator83 » Sat Apr 9, 2016 5:00 pm

This isn't going to end well....
Fantasy Hoops/Football/Baseball fans..

For info on a forum that actually talks Fantasy sports and not spammed with soliciting leagues, PM me. The more the merrier !
NBAfan3024
RealGM
Posts: 16,568
And1: 7,035
Joined: May 25, 2013
Contact:
 

Re: What makes the 2016 Warriors any better than the 1997 Bulls? 

Post#13 » by NBAfan3024 » Sat Apr 9, 2016 5:04 pm

Mods lock this crap
laika
Analyst
Posts: 3,044
And1: 1,996
Joined: Mar 22, 2011

Re: What makes the 2016 Warriors any better than the 1997 Bulls? 

Post#14 » by laika » Sat Apr 9, 2016 6:59 pm

JonFromVA wrote:
mihail_petkov wrote:I think that Warriors ORTG and DRTG are not accurate to real number because during 1/4 of the season their starters didn't play in the whole forth quarter + a few other quarters where they played only 3-4 minutes. Then their bench kill the difference every time when they come to the floor in already decided games.


This is typical, though, and the W's have a pretty good bench that at least will hold leads.


They do not. The Warriors bench is massively overrated and is statistically one of the worst in the league.

It's hard to find lineup numbers for 97, but my guess is that the Warrior's best lineups are a lot better than the Bulls.
User avatar
AIfan3
Head Coach
Posts: 6,561
And1: 3,816
Joined: Mar 21, 2005
Location: Searching for AI's mojo..

Re: What makes the 2016 Warriors any better than the 1997 Bulls? 

Post#15 » by AIfan3 » Sat Apr 9, 2016 7:06 pm

NBAfan3024 wrote:Mods lock this crap


Truth..

We have this thread every month it seems..
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,866
And1: 31,465
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: What makes the 2016 Warriors any better than the 1997 Bulls? 

Post#16 » by Domejandro » Sat Apr 9, 2016 7:23 pm

AIfan3 wrote:
NBAfan3024 wrote:Mods lock this crap


Truth..

We have this thread every month it seems..

I would actually argue that it is weekly.

In any case, for me personally, I would pick the Warriors in a best of seven series.
User avatar
CP300 lbs
Junior
Posts: 355
And1: 258
Joined: Nov 19, 2015

Re: What makes the 2016 Warriors any better than the 1997 Bulls? 

Post#17 » by CP300 lbs » Sat Apr 9, 2016 7:26 pm

NBAfan3024 wrote:Mods lock this crap


Agreed. Lock this up Mods.
User avatar
whocurrz
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,259
And1: 1,491
Joined: Apr 14, 2011
   

Re: What makes the 2016 Warriors any better than the 1997 Bulls? 

Post#18 » by whocurrz » Sat Apr 9, 2016 8:06 pm

laika wrote:
JonFromVA wrote:
mihail_petkov wrote:I think that Warriors ORTG and DRTG are not accurate to real number because during 1/4 of the season their starters didn't play in the whole forth quarter + a few other quarters where they played only 3-4 minutes. Then their bench kill the difference every time when they come to the floor in already decided games.


This is typical, though, and the W's have a pretty good bench that at least will hold leads.


They do not. The Warriors bench is massively overrated and is statistically one of the worst in the league.

It's hard to find lineup numbers for 97, but my guess is that the Warrior's best lineups are a lot better than the Bulls.


There's good individual players on the warriors bench who can play with starters well. Iguodala is a great 6th man who improves the defense, is a good secondary ball handler and with those two skills really helps the transition game. Livingston allows Curry to play off ball and has the post game to punish opposing teams if they switch their longer defenders on Curry and try to guard Shaun with PGs. Ezeli is a good roll man to catch lobs from the 4 on 3s created in the Curry/Green pick and roll. Barbosa and Speights are both gunners off the bench who can provide good offense but not the most consistent. But as a whole the bench is a poor fit to play together. Iguodala, Livingston and Barbosa are all most effective with the ball in their hands and although good at cutting off ball, none are floor spacers. Iguodala and Livingston are basically redundant when playing together. Speights is pretty good at stretching the floor. Ezeli is a solid defender, rebounder and roll man but not a very good at scoring when creating his own shot.
Jarret Jack: “I brought one of my best suits. But looking down at this jersey, it’s just a sense of pride I don’t think I’ve ever felt as a professional. … Nothing in my closet is better than what I have on now."
Tinseltown
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,334
And1: 1,917
Joined: Aug 19, 2013
 

Re: What makes the 2016 Warriors any better than the 1997 Bulls? 

Post#19 » by Tinseltown » Sat Apr 9, 2016 8:10 pm

2016 Steph Curry > 1997 Michael Jordan
Fico92
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,899
And1: 2,361
Joined: Aug 05, 2014

Re: What makes the 2016 Warriors any better than the 1997 Bulls? 

Post#20 » by Fico92 » Sat Apr 9, 2016 8:15 pm

mihail_petkov wrote:I think that Warriors ORTG and DRTG are not accurate to real number because during 1/4 of the season their starters didn't play in the whole forth quarter + a few other quarters where they played only 3-4 minutes. Then their bench kill the difference every time when they come to the floor in already decided games.

As opposed to the Bulls who played their starters 48 minutes.

Return to The General Board