cosmofizzo wrote:
Six million dollars for Jon Leuer? I heard Hakim Warrick is available...
You take the opportunities you get. You can't just go out and get a max free agent. They have to agree to sign. That'ot
Whoa...slow down, there, slappy. Where have you been for the past, oh, IDK, 5 years, and Sarver's stunts, interviews, etc.
I never once said Philly, I said stop signing non-All-Stars to 15-20% of our cap. Hindsight?? Really?? How many non-All-NBA, 33 YO players receive $13M per for 4 years? That's not hindsight; everyone knew at the time it was an overpay. Getting quality FAs to sign here? How about develop some youth INTO All-Stars, like many teams do. That's all I'm saying. If anything, as I've stated recently, they should attempt an approach closer to Minny's. I'm saying, quit buying non-All-NBA types, that would be 2 in one year, for 2/5ths of our cap this year, and darn near 1/3 of our cap next year. Especially, when we have another $14M, non-All-NBA contract on the books.
And Jon Leuer, for what would be the equivalent of about $4.2M per last year, is a heck of a lot better than Chandler for 3X that much. Sorry bub, that's not hindsight. Jon Leuer, when actually given minutes, like December, was shooting 53%, 39.4% from 3, bringing in 7 Rebs and scoring nearly 12 per game in 26 minutes per game. That's sure as heck worth about $6M at nest year's Salary Cap number of $89M. We could sign him 15X for that amount. Last year the Cap was $63M, or 71% of next years Cap of, again $89M, so yeah, $6M for a bench PF, which we have how many on contract next season?? Oh, that's right, none!
Knight's contract of $14M was ALSO considered an overpay when it happened. Don't believe me?? Go back to posts both on this forum and the T&T forum. Get outta here with your "hindsight" crap--they were junk deals when they happened. At least Chandler made SOME sense, because we needed a Vet Big, but hey, let's trade away IT, a PG, who cost half as much, and gave more production, for Knight, another PG. Oh wait, he was a 'ball hog', thank goodness Knight's not that way...whew...
So when you ACTUALLY understand what I was posting, and ACTUALLY know the difference between a contract signed under $63M, one signed under $70M (this year), and one signed under an $89M Cap, come on back and discuss.
Where did I EVER say following the Philly model...when did I EVER say we could sign any Max FA...and Sarver??? Yeah, he's the owner, the one paying the bills, hiring and firing GMs and HCs...so yeah, I am gonna blame the owner for some of this; McD owns some of this, for sure, but Sarver is FAR from blameless. So again, when you understand what I was getting at, and understand the Cap situation, then feel free to comment, but until then, making baseless accusations as to what I said is pointless, because that's not what I said...like, not even close...
Sorry I upset you. I believe my reading comprehension skills are fine, though.
Following Minnesota's model... I don't even know what that means. First, we must have a superstar and a team willing to give us the #1 pick for him. The following year, we must win the lottery. That's not a plan. You just chose the one team with better young talent than us and said, "We should be them." Might as well say we should be the '84 Bulls.