deeps6x wrote:It isn't about 'next season' for the PG/C/SG/SF positions on the team because we have players in the pipeline to fill future voids.
But at PF, we have 2Pat for one season and nobody to take his place. Some project Bruno there, but that is at least 2 years away, probably 3 consider how much he still needs to learn and how much body mass he would need to add.
We need a couple PFs added NOW so that at least one can be our starter in a year (assuming we can't resign 2Pat - and realistically we won't want to when cap space peaks and everyone is bidding for him next summer).
However, even if we can't find a 'ready to start in a year' PF in this draft, at least the glut of PFs available (10 will go in the first round!) will shake loose some other more developed PFs that might not have reached their potential - and they will be available on the cheap. This is what happened in Charlotte, when they drafted Kaminsky and let Biyombo go to make room for him. The same thing will happen to 10 other PFs this summer as the drafting teams try to make room for them.
PF will become the most saturated position in the league, ahead of PGs a year from now. So at least we won't have to pay through the nose for one. Who knows, maybe we can even find the cash to retain 2Pat. But I doubt it. He will be looking to get paid. His big contract for his prime years. If we are giving DD and Kyle $50M/yr, we just won't be able to afford him. And everyone will have a new batch of cap space next summer as well. SO I'll wish 2Pat well, and hope the PFs we added this summer are ready to go.
That is why Masai will NOT consider Skal or Thon. They are too far behind at least 6 other first round PFs. 7 if Rabb stays in the draft.
Do you know something the rest of us don't?
We can always trade for a PF to hold us over until a younger player is developed. The draft should be about selecting who you think will be the best player several years down the line. If Masai thinks someone like Skal or Chriss has a good chance to be better than Sabonis 5 years from now, that's who he should select. The draft is about long-term solutions. Trying to address short-term problems with long-term solutions doesn't make sense to me.























