Chamberlainship wrote:^Yeah. I get that vibe too. But the Knicks are kinda caught in between if they really think Porzingis is going to be a star. Melo is too young to already be playing the veteran-mentor role. he's still a star, if a very difficult one to build around. In an age where players talk all the time, you could see someone hatching a plan that includes landing Melo.
Melo has a no-trade clause, even if the Knicks wanted to move him, they can't without his permission. That means it has to be to a big media market to appease his reality tv wife and his own personal business interests and ventures. Look at the places he looked at during his last free agency: NYC, LA, Chi.
Chicago is out with the Rose contract and the mess they're currently stuck in with GarPax.
It's not like the Brooklyn Nets are in a better place rebuilding-wise than the Knicks with Porzingis, so there's no reason to move across town.
That leaves LA with the Lakers and Clippers. Unless you're getting Westbrook or Durant to the Lakers, the Lakers youngins are probably worse than the Knicks' Porzingis, not to mention more headcases like Nick Young and whatever TMZ hidden camera schtick D'Angelo Russell is into next. And the Clippers are pretty maxed out, so trading for Melo would mean moving out a large contract like CP3 or Blake Griffin or DeAndre Jordan or something, which makes their team worse arguable and a sideways move at best with no hope of beating the Warriors dynasty anyway.
You can hatch all the plans you want to move Melo, but unless it's to a big media market glamor city with a chance to win it all, I don't see why he would sign off on it. He might, and I stress
might, sign off on pairing up with Lebron or Steph Curry and a surefire path to a ring, but other than that, I don't think he'll approve any destination that's not NYC or LA (he even decided no to Chicago last free agency...there's a huge jump in media market size between NYC/LA and anywhere else).