RSCD3_ wrote:Anyone sick of the way that LeBron gets his opponents under-credited whenever he beats them.
For instance the 2012 celtics were too old despite them playing way above theo record in 2010 and were dismissed as has beens . The 2012 OKC team is just a bunch of kids who were happy to be there, the 2013 pacers shouldnt have pushed the heat to 7 games. The 2015 hawks who won 60+ games ( albeit they were on the Lower end but they were still a tough ECF team ) were dismissed like they were the hawks who barely made the playoffs last year. Now Cleveland has faced a few strong defense including a -5.0+ DRTG Atlanta and killed it and now these teams identities are being rewritten. Even if they beat GSW or SAS in the finals im sure they'll be talk of how the warriors the past two years were a fluke or the spurs aren't as good as prime Duncan teams and benefited from curry's injury and LeBron missed the clearly better team.
Anyone else notice this, even from people who don't hate on LeBron directly. If he wins, it's not cause of him being tough but the opponent being weak. It's almost comic book levels, where a villain sees all his henchman defeated even his #2 and blames them all for being too weak instead of acknowledging the hero
I am just going to mention why I think this is the case.
I think they get credit for beating the Thunder for sure people just say Thunder choked because of Harden. The 2012 Celtics were nothing special and it isn't that they beat them it is that they fell behind in the series 3-2 to them. 2013 Pacers were ok, but considering one team won 66 and another under 50 games that is why people may bring it up. 2015 Hawks were a team that was tied up 2-2 against a 38 win team in round 1 so you knew you weren't going to expect much from them nor do they have a marquee star. Not like they were a 2004 Pistons team with tight defense or something.
I think they will get the credit if they beat the Spurs or Warriors though. Don't see how they could not unless Curry doesn't play or something.