The Hawks Have To Have A Shakeup Right?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

0to100
Freshman
Posts: 54
And1: 24
Joined: Jan 11, 2015
 

Re: The Hawks Have To Have A Shakeup Right? 

Post#141 » by 0to100 » Tue May 10, 2016 12:49 am

bwgood77 wrote:
0to100 wrote:
Ong_dynasty wrote:I love the answer. They need a superstar..isn't that all teams? Lol.


What we actually mean by a "superstar" is a player who can score 20 ppg or atleast get to the line. The irony is we need a iso-Joe type player in the 4th. Our main problem is that in the 4th quarter nobody wants to shoot the ball or take over. You can actually see and feel the game flow change when it is crunch time.


I think you guys should trade for Brandon Knight. He definitely thinks he's a superstar and has no problem shooting a lot and thinking he can take over at the end.


For Jeff Teague? Lets sign the papers!!!
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,318
And1: 61,068
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: The Hawks Have To Have A Shakeup Right? 

Post#142 » by bwgood77 » Tue May 10, 2016 1:07 am

0to100 wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
0to100 wrote:
What we actually mean by a "superstar" is a player who can score 20 ppg or atleast get to the line. The irony is we need a iso-Joe type player in the 4th. Our main problem is that in the 4th quarter nobody wants to shoot the ball or take over. You can actually see and feel the game flow change when it is crunch time.


I think you guys should trade for Brandon Knight. He definitely thinks he's a superstar and has no problem shooting a lot and thinking he can take over at the end.


For Jeff Teague? Lets sign the papers!!!


I'd probably be game for that. Why did his assist numbers drop this year? The Suns could use a better passing pg in case Bledsoe gets injured and then maybe draft one last in the first and can decide later if they want to let Teague walk. If Bledsoe gets injured again maybe try and keep him. With Booker, Knight is kind of expendable. Suns also have another SG, Bogdan Bogdanovic coming over one of the next two seasons...he's been playing well hitting long game winning shots in the league he's playing in.
User avatar
Rafael122
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,826
And1: 3,557
Joined: Oct 11, 2004
       

Re: The Hawks Have To Have A Shakeup Right? 

Post#143 » by Rafael122 » Tue May 10, 2016 2:09 am

Atlanta is built for the regular season, just like the Celtics are. So Boston can play 10 guys every night and get away with it. But when it comes to the playoffs? You need that dog, that alpha male and teams like Atlanta and Boston don't have them.

IMO, the answer isn't to keep the current team and hope for the best. Yes there have been injuries and such but the fact is the team as currently constructed can't make the Finals.
Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.
User avatar
Hello Brooklyn
RealGM
Posts: 17,545
And1: 13,323
Joined: Dec 24, 2012
   

Re: The Hawks Have To Have A Shakeup Right? 

Post#144 » by Hello Brooklyn » Tue May 10, 2016 3:13 am

Hawks need to find a way to get a superstar.

Gotta find someone unhappy. They do have assets. Maybe they can convince Dwight to come to his hometown? Not a superstar, but still better then anyone they have.
User avatar
Chuck Everett
RealGM
Posts: 19,387
And1: 22,357
Joined: May 28, 2004
Location: Los Angeles
   

Re: The Hawks Have To Have A Shakeup Right? 

Post#145 » by Chuck Everett » Tue May 10, 2016 5:02 am

Horford can do whatever he wants, yet people are acting like Atlanta owns him. To me, the fact that he averaged 3 rebounds indicates a guy who didn't want to get injured during the playoffs, so he can secure his next payday. I guess he could get offered some 5 year/120+ million dollar deal from the Hawks, which I am sure he would accept, but if those aren't the numbers, why would he stay in Atlanta? For example, Minnesota and Portland are much better places for him and he could play the 4 spot.
"Kill 'em with Grindness."
jeeph
Senior
Posts: 662
And1: 573
Joined: Jun 06, 2012

Re: The Hawks Have To Have A Shakeup Right? 

Post#146 » by jeeph » Tue May 10, 2016 5:09 am

They don't need to blow it up. But they do need to restructure. Too much overlap of skills and lack of rotation flexibility.

Horford and Milsap are both good but they are too similar. Neither are great rim protectors or rebounders. Look what a difference a lesser talent like Humphries made when in the game. He's a banger and boarder. But compliments either of the main two.

Teague and Schroeder are the two best penatrators and creators but they are both true PG's. Can't put them on the court at the same time. So when one is out there all the defense has to do is shift to one side, no backside pressure.

Coach Bud might be a great coach but there is only so much you can do when you can't alter your rotations to match up with opponents. Their bigs aren't big, and their smalls are too small. So they can't play to overpower you and they can't out small ball you. All they can do is medium ball.

If I were them I would trade Schroeder for a combo guard, either 3 & D or slasher. They would both work with Teague to go small ball or just a normal line up. I would trade Milsap while his value is high for an athletic wing that can guard 3's or play a small ball 4. And sign a center to put Horford at the 4 where he has always belonged. Can still make Horford the small ball 5 in stretches.

^^ That right there, even if they had less overall talent, like my Humphries comment, would make the team more able to compete against anyone. They match up well with teams like Boston because Boston is also stuck with medium ball, but against teams like the Cavs/GSW small ball or the Spurs big ball and they find themselves with major mismatch problems. Match ups are quite an important factor in bball, trying to out team play opponents against teams that out match you is not conducive to success, especially in the playoffs.
User avatar
mrblunt
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,772
And1: 1,077
Joined: Mar 15, 2009

Re: The Hawks Have To Have A Shakeup Right? 

Post#147 » by mrblunt » Tue May 10, 2016 6:43 am

Hawks will get the hometown kid Dwight Howard. Too bad he's past his prime now. But no one else will want Howard so the Hawks will likely end up with him. Then they will let Horford walk and overpay Howard instead. Enjoy a half filled stadium Dwight and Atlanta perfect match.
Kings of The Court
Image
chefdan
Sophomore
Posts: 192
And1: 70
Joined: Jul 04, 2011

Re: The Hawks Have To Have A Shakeup Right? 

Post#148 » by chefdan » Tue May 10, 2016 11:47 am

We are just gonna retool I hope and still push for the top 4 next year, underneath the Cavs, who now have us mindf**ked, the East is wide open.

I hope we resign both Horford and Bazemore. Trade Teague and try and package him with #21 to get a lottery pick this year. Maybe put the feelers out and see what Korver will get.

The FA stuff I trust Bud to bring in the right type of guys to get us to that next step and are the right ones for the system. We saw during the regular season last season and post all star break this one that when the players are up and firing and the systems running perfectly , we can look unstoppable, and sustain it.

This year and last, if we'd been able to beat the Cavs we were a really good chance of going to the finals. If we find those pieces to get past the Cavs I think our core is still young enough and strong enough to contend without tinkering too much.
tribulations
Analyst
Posts: 3,432
And1: 1,375
Joined: Aug 21, 2004

Re: The Hawks Have To Have A Shakeup Right? 

Post#149 » by tribulations » Tue May 10, 2016 11:51 am

Surely time to give the keys to Schroder.

They need to move Teague for a meaningul piece, perhaps trade one of Millsap or Horford, deepen the end of their bench and reload for next season.
naabzor
Analyst
Posts: 3,203
And1: 2,920
Joined: Jul 03, 2014

Re: The Hawks Have To Have A Shakeup Right? 

Post#150 » by naabzor » Tue May 10, 2016 11:53 am

They are starting Kyle freakin Korver. Cut me a break. He is nowhere near a starter. He was barely a starter one or two season ago.
massive attack
Sophomore
Posts: 168
And1: 85
Joined: Aug 12, 2012
   

Re: Re: The Hawks Have To Have A Shakeup Right? 

Post#151 » by massive attack » Tue May 10, 2016 12:09 pm

King Ken wrote:
massive attack wrote:
NBAfan3024 wrote:Need a star who can win a game they just have none


Yes the Hawks have too many players on that borderline all-star level. They're a great regular season team, but in the playoffs they seem to lack that one player to give them the edge against big teams like the Cavs.

Sap and Horford are legit all stars. Teague is a all star talent. Dennis has all star talent. We just don't have any stars or superstars. "That dude" as they say. Cleveland has two of them. OKC has two. SAS has two. GS has maybe three. We don't have one. That's a problem.

We need to find a way to get that dude.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk


I agree with you for the most part, I probably shouldn't have generalised that as such. Millsap and Horford are all-star players, though I would put them in the low tier of all-stars, and I mean that in the nicest way possible. Teague has all-star talent but I think Schroder has the bigger potential and the Hawks would benefit with him in a starting role.

To me, one of Millsap or Horford are expendable, as well as Teague.
Ball4life32
Analyst
Posts: 3,311
And1: 2,751
Joined: Dec 05, 2013
     

Re: The Hawks Have To Have A Shakeup Right? 

Post#152 » by Ball4life32 » Tue May 10, 2016 12:14 pm

naabzor wrote:They are starting Kyle freakin Korver. Cut me a break. He is nowhere near a starter. He was barely a starter one or two season ago.

Yeah he was barely a starter when he was an all star last year. Makes sense.
jpengland
General Manager
Posts: 7,615
And1: 6,944
Joined: Jan 22, 2014
   

Re: The Hawks Have To Have A Shakeup Right? 

Post#153 » by jpengland » Tue May 10, 2016 12:16 pm

naabzor wrote:They are starting Kyle freakin Korver. Cut me a break. He is nowhere near a starter. He was barely a starter one or two season ago.


When he was an allstar and a top 2 shooter in the league?

He's coming off an injury, he's still a decent defender and shooter. Gotta hope that a summer of rehab he has at least one more strong season in him.

If he is available, playoff teams will be lining up to take him off ATLs hands.
naabzor
Analyst
Posts: 3,203
And1: 2,920
Joined: Jul 03, 2014

Re: The Hawks Have To Have A Shakeup Right? 

Post#154 » by naabzor » Tue May 10, 2016 2:34 pm

jpengland wrote:
naabzor wrote:They are starting Kyle freakin Korver. Cut me a break. He is nowhere near a starter. He was barely a starter one or two season ago.


When he was an allstar and a top 2 shooter in the league?

He's coming off an injury, he's still a decent defender and shooter. Gotta hope that a summer of rehab he has at least one more strong season in him.

If he is available, playoff teams will be lining up to take him off ATLs hands.


That year they just gave the entire hawks team the all star status just because they were playing well but probably no one was a real all star. For sure Korver was not an all star.
User avatar
Deivork
Veteran
Posts: 2,763
And1: 2,482
Joined: Apr 26, 2013

Re: The Hawks Have To Have A Shakeup Right? 

Post#155 » by Deivork » Tue May 10, 2016 3:19 pm

0to100 wrote:It is pretty clear that many people in this thread don't watch the Hawks and I could care less. But some of the statements here are pretty ridiculous. We actually had a shakeup when we let Josh Smith go and signed Millsap 2013 and last year we won 60 games. But now the new team is getting old and our main problem is that we don't have a superstar player. If we could sign a good SG/SF who has star potential or who can score in the playoffs when things get though we could actually matchup against Cleveland very well.


And what realistic option would that be?
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,213
And1: 36,255
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: The Hawks Have To Have A Shakeup Right? 

Post#156 » by jbk1234 » Tue May 10, 2016 3:31 pm

Hello Brooklyn wrote:Hawks need to find a way to get a superstar.

Gotta find someone unhappy. They do have assets. Maybe they can convince Dwight to come to his hometown? Not a superstar, but still better then anyone they have.


Atlanta would be better off with Howard on a four-year deal than Horford on a five-year deal. Horford is the better player but he should really be playing PF and Atlanta already has Milsap under contract. There are some older near-max FAs who will be getting max deals this year and that fifth year is going to give home teams pause.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
mtron929
Head Coach
Posts: 6,324
And1: 5,289
Joined: Jan 01, 2014

Re: The Hawks Have To Have A Shakeup Right? 

Post#157 » by mtron929 » Tue May 10, 2016 4:03 pm

A lot of people act like a good team like the Hawks can make small changes here and there to become a championship level team. They just can't. They have maxed out. Similar to how the Memphis Grizzlies had maxed out. The trajectory of this team and the height of where they went was not surprising because it was pretty much a mission to building a good (but not great) team. This happens to most teams unfortunately. That is, they are doomed to fail.
NekiEcko
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,435
And1: 336
Joined: Nov 30, 2011
         

Re: The Hawks Have To Have A Shakeup Right? 

Post#158 » by NekiEcko » Tue May 10, 2016 4:50 pm

Chuck Everett wrote:Horford can do whatever he wants, yet people are acting like Atlanta owns him. To me, the fact that he averaged 3 rebounds indicates a guy who didn't want to get injured during the playoffs, so he can secure his next payday. I guess he could get offered some 5 year/120+ million dollar deal from the Hawks, which I am sure he would accept, but if those aren't the numbers, why would he stay in Atlanta? For example, Minnesota and Portland are much better places for him and he could play the 4 spot.


Well most people believes that but others have the same mindset as you. Al is a good player but he is very inconsistent with his play and one thing that really piss me off about him that he had a great mid-range game but he decided to added the 3 point and that was one of the reason why his numbers was down.

We like to resigned him but he didn't prove to us that he is a max contract. If he thinks that he is one, he can go somewhere else. This situation is Joe Johnson 2.0 with more on the line.
User avatar
Deivork
Veteran
Posts: 2,763
And1: 2,482
Joined: Apr 26, 2013

Re: The Hawks Have To Have A Shakeup Right? 

Post#159 » by Deivork » Tue May 10, 2016 5:07 pm

mtron929 wrote:A lot of people act like a good team like the Hawks can make small changes here and there to become a championship level team. They just can't. They have maxed out. Similar to how the Memphis Grizzlies had maxed out. The trajectory of this team and the height of where they went was not surprising because it was pretty much a mission to building a good (but not great) team. This happens to most teams unfortunately. That is, they are doomed to fail.


I don't necessarily agree. Well, it depends on what we consider big or small, but... how about adding Rasheed for the 2004 Pistons or adding Chandler for the 2011 Mavericks?

Maybe we exagerate the narrative of the need to build from the scratch to get a Durant or a LeBron.
User avatar
ATLmixboy
Ballboy
Posts: 16
And1: 13
Joined: Jul 30, 2010
     

Re: The Hawks Have To Have A Shakeup Right? 

Post#160 » by ATLmixboy » Tue May 10, 2016 5:47 pm

laploutocratie wrote:Some teams are just content making the 2nd round year in and year out.



This definitely can not be applied about this hawks team. They did make the ECF just a year ago. If they werent playing lazy basketball during the last game of the regular season, they would of locked up the 3rd Seed and chances are pretty good they land back into the ECF again this year although the same results more than likely happen if they face Cavs.

Although the standings do not show it, when this team is clicking on all cylinders I believe they are the second best team in the Eastern Conference but regardless Cleveland is just the much better team right now so that becomes pointless.

This is back to back sweeps for the Hawks although this year with the exception of Game 3 the games were a lot closer than last year. There was some small progression compared to last year in the playoffs but not enough to translate to any wins, which is what matters in the end.

I do not think this team needs to be blown up but at the same time this team as currently constructed needs some change. A retooling of the team and finding a volume scorer who can bring it in crunch time is something this team desperately needs. Korver needs to move to the bench and one of either Schroder or Teague has to be traded to land a go to scorer. It does not have to be a superstar talent, a 20 point a night player will do.

I do not think letting Horford go for nothing is a good idea...he needs to be resigned and can always be traded later if you need to.

Return to The General Board