ImageImageImage

2016 draft thread: Part 2

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
firyGM
Junior
Posts: 301
And1: 62
Joined: Jul 10, 2014
Location: Spain
   

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#481 » by firyGM » Wed May 18, 2016 5:24 pm

Trade:

5th pick to Denver

Faried and 15th pick to Minny.

With 15th pick draft Luwawu or Sabonis.
User avatar
bwright213
Freshman
Posts: 98
And1: 23
Joined: Mar 24, 2012
       

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#482 » by bwright213 » Wed May 18, 2016 5:33 pm

Devilzsidewalk wrote:
kmgarnett21 wrote:Doogie on 1500 ESPN: Kris Dunn talk to the Wolves is legit. Mentions Ibaka and Faried as potential trade targets for 5th pick.

wow, Faried. Imagine how disappointing that would feel.


I just threw up in my mouth a little bit at the thought of trading the 5th pick for Faried. Serge Ibaka is certainly an interesting thought though.
User avatar
Takingbaconback
Head Coach
Posts: 6,952
And1: 2,625
Joined: Jun 22, 2013
   

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#483 » by Takingbaconback » Wed May 18, 2016 5:35 pm

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xk934iqtQtc[/youtube]

I rather get Murray but Dunn's hard nose defense, energy, and discipline might sway Thibs during workout and interview. Seems like his type of guy.
thinktank
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,302
And1: 2,641
Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Location: Mpls

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#484 » by thinktank » Wed May 18, 2016 5:43 pm

Klomp wrote:
thinktank wrote:
mercgold3 wrote:My favorite at #5 still is Dunn.
There's so much Dwyane Wade in Kris Dunn IMO

Hield has a lot of that, too.

Really? Do you seriously read this part of his scouting report and think "that sounds like Buddy Hield"?

Regardless of what position Wade plays, he is going to have to add a jump shot to his arsenal. Wade rarely relied on the perimeter game at the college level because of his ability to take his man off the dribble. The athletic guards of the NBA are far more likely to be able to contain his penetration. Wade better be able to go to his jumper once they do.

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/basketball/draft/2003-shooting-guards.htm#waded


You're reverse engineering.

I said Hield has a lot of what Wade has, meaning I think Hield has a lot of the same ballhandling, slashing, and finishing in a smaller than optimal SG package, that Wade had--only Hield shoots it better.

I'm very interested in seeing how Hield turns out because his shooting could be so hot that he becomes the best player of the draft.

Major boom potential for Hield.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,470
And1: 12,340
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#485 » by Worm Guts » Wed May 18, 2016 5:44 pm

Hield really doesn't come close to Wade's explosiveness.
User avatar
bwright213
Freshman
Posts: 98
And1: 23
Joined: Mar 24, 2012
       

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#486 » by bwright213 » Wed May 18, 2016 5:45 pm

firyGM wrote:Trade:

5th pick to Denver

Faried and 15th pick to Minny.

With 15th pick draft Luwawu or Sabonis.


I would have to pass, I just don't like Faried's game outside of his hustle. I wouldn't think he would be somebody Thibs would target, but maybe I'm wrong.
User avatar
firyGM
Junior
Posts: 301
And1: 62
Joined: Jul 10, 2014
Location: Spain
   

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#487 » by firyGM » Wed May 18, 2016 5:52 pm

Faried is good in defense. KAT, Wiggins and LaVine for score is enough in my opinion. Moreover it isn't only Faried, we could draft Luwawu or Sabonis too. 5th pick for Faried isn't enough for me.
thinktank
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,302
And1: 2,641
Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Location: Mpls

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#488 » by thinktank » Wed May 18, 2016 5:53 pm

Worm Guts wrote:Hield really doesn't come close to Wade's explosiveness.


Maybe not, but he has the ability to finish in traffic and is really nifty around the rim like Wade.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,420
And1: 22,832
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#489 » by Klomp » Wed May 18, 2016 5:58 pm

I don't like that Hield doesn't seem to have positional flexibility. That gives both Dunn and Murray a major advantage, to me.

I also like the fact that Dunn is older. He's 11 months older than Wiggins, 12 months older than LaVine and 20 months older than Towns. Not too old that he doesn't fit the age range, but it should be a little quicker of an adjustment for him. (for the record, Hield is four months older than Dunn, and Murray is 15 months younger than Towns.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
bwright213
Freshman
Posts: 98
And1: 23
Joined: Mar 24, 2012
       

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#490 » by bwright213 » Wed May 18, 2016 6:13 pm

Takingbaconback wrote:
thinktank wrote:
ESPNSAMI wrote:Worst case- Kris Dunn- don't need another point guard who can't shoot.


Why do people keep saying Dunn can't shoot?

48% 2FG.

45% FG%.

37% 3FG%.


I'm surprised by that, I thought he was a much worse shooter than that. Didn't think he would be worth drafting to replace Rubio, but if he shows up to be a good shooter in workouts, I can definitely see Minny taking him as backup PG. His defense, size, mobility, athleticism are excellent for PG prospect so it makes it much easier to get him. He has hovered around .690 FT% for 3 seasons so I would make sure he is a good shooter first.


I think he's a decent shooter, certainly seems to have a better shot than Rubio, but like you pointed out I do have concerns with his FT%. Outside of the decent shooting and at times questionable decision making (seems like he is improving though) I love everything else he brings to the table as a PG.
I do question how good he is off the ball and that is my biggest problem. We already have Rubio and I think people forget how good he is. It's just not a position of need. I would rather take somebody like Murray if we are looking at going guard with the pick. All in all I wouldn't hate taking Dunn, because i do like his game, but I think we would be better served looking elsewhere.
thinktank
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,302
And1: 2,641
Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Location: Mpls

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#491 » by thinktank » Wed May 18, 2016 6:19 pm

Klomp wrote:I don't like that Hield doesn't seem to have positional flexibility. That gives both Dunn and Murray a major advantage, to me.


You may regret weighing positional flexibility so heavily if Hield fulfills his potential as a lights-out scorer.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,420
And1: 22,832
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#492 » by Klomp » Wed May 18, 2016 6:21 pm

thinktank wrote:
Klomp wrote:I don't like that Hield doesn't seem to have positional flexibility. That gives both Dunn and Murray a major advantage, to me.

You may regret weighing positional flexibility so heavily if Hield fulfills his potential as a lights-out scorer.

Not when we already have two players who should be locked in for 30 mpg.

If you want Hield to get 20+ minutes as a rookie, prepare yourselves for the PG LaVine Show, boys and girls....
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,034
And1: 6,054
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#493 » by Devilzsidewalk » Wed May 18, 2016 6:23 pm

There's really no substantive reason I can think of for Hield not being an elite prospect. His #s are off the charts, his quick-release perimeter bomber style is what the NBA loves right now, and his measurements are good. People feel kinda uncomfortable with seniors sometimes, and w/ Hield specifically, there seems to be this idea that he blew up over night, but he's been good for awhile, just started his freshman year slowly and then flew under the radar playing for a second tier program that's never been known as an NBA talent producer. But his sophomore year beats Oladipo's sophomore year for example, so he's been putting up nice #s for awhile, he just completely took it to another level this year.
Image
User avatar
bwright213
Freshman
Posts: 98
And1: 23
Joined: Mar 24, 2012
       

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#494 » by bwright213 » Wed May 18, 2016 6:26 pm

firyGM wrote:Faried is good in defense. KAT, Wiggins and LaVine for score is enough in my opinion. Moreover it isn't only Faried, we could draft Luwawu or Sabonis too. 5th pick for Faried isn't enough for me.


I would have to respectfully disagree with you on Faried's defense, he's a below average defender. IMO Luwawu or Sabonis isn't worth taking on Faried and trading the 5th pick, the value just isn't there for me.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,034
And1: 6,054
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#495 » by Devilzsidewalk » Wed May 18, 2016 6:30 pm

Klomp wrote:
thinktank wrote:
Klomp wrote:I don't like that Hield doesn't seem to have positional flexibility. That gives both Dunn and Murray a major advantage, to me.

You may regret weighing positional flexibility so heavily if Hield fulfills his potential as a lights-out scorer.

Not when we already have two players who should be locked in for 30 mpg.

If you want Hield to get 20+ minutes as a rookie, prepare yourselves for the PG LaVine Show, boys and girls....


Murray has a 6'6" wingspan - it might the difference between a guy that's a decent fit at 2 positions or a guy that's a great fit at 1 position.
Image
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,420
And1: 22,832
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#496 » by Klomp » Wed May 18, 2016 6:34 pm

Devilzsidewalk wrote:Murray has a 6'6" wingspan - it might the difference between a guy that's a decent fit at 2 positions or a guy that's a great fit at 1 position.

It's a 1/4th inch longer than McCollum's....he does OK at two different positions, don't you think?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,827
And1: 8,857
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#497 » by C.lupus » Wed May 18, 2016 6:41 pm

Klomp wrote:
thinktank wrote:
Klomp wrote:I don't like that Hield doesn't seem to have positional flexibility. That gives both Dunn and Murray a major advantage, to me.

You may regret weighing positional flexibility so heavily if Hield fulfills his potential as a lights-out scorer.

Not when we already have two players who should be locked in for 30 mpg.

If you want Hield to get 20+ minutes as a rookie, prepare yourselves for the PG LaVine Show, boys and girls....

28 mpg for LaVine, 20 mpg for Hield. Problem solved boys and girls.

Next I will take on climate change.
User avatar
bwright213
Freshman
Posts: 98
And1: 23
Joined: Mar 24, 2012
       

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#498 » by bwright213 » Wed May 18, 2016 6:47 pm

Devilzsidewalk wrote:There's really no substantive reason I can think of for Hield not being an elite prospect. His #s are off the charts, his quick-release perimeter bomber style is what the NBA loves right now, and his measurements are good. People feel kinda uncomfortable with seniors sometimes, and w/ Hield specifically, there seems to be this idea that he blew up over night, but he's been good for awhile, just started his freshman year slowly and then flew under the radar playing for a second tier program that's never been known as an NBA talent producer. But his sophomore year beats Oladipo's sophomore year for example, so he's been putting up nice #s for awhile, he just completely took it to another level this year.


He's been good for awhile, but until this year he was much more of a volume scorer than a efficient scorer.
I do agree that seniors get a bad rap and everyone looks at them as finished products which is not always the case. He is a little worrying because his first 3 years he was a fringe prospect, probably late first round material, then at 22 he figures it out and he is seen as a potential top 5 pick. I have seen a lot of video on him and I feel like he has I improved on his weaknesses and has refined his shot, but I personally still like Murray over him.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,470
And1: 12,340
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#499 » by Worm Guts » Wed May 18, 2016 6:47 pm

Devilzsidewalk wrote:There's really no substantive reason I can think of for Hield not being an elite prospect. His #s are off the charts, his quick-release perimeter bomber style is what the NBA loves right now, and his measurements are good. People feel kinda uncomfortable with seniors sometimes, and w/ Hield specifically, there seems to be this idea that he blew up over night, but he's been good for awhile, just started his freshman year slowly and then flew under the radar playing for a second tier program that's never been known as an NBA talent producer. But his sophomore year beats Oladipo's sophomore year for example, so he's been putting up nice #s for awhile, he just completely took it to another level this year.


He's an elite shooter but not really elite at anything else. If he stays an elite shooter and is able to create his own shot in the NBA, he'll be good. If his shooting regresses to where it was as a junior or he's not able to create the same type of space he did in college he's probably going to be pretty average.
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,827
And1: 8,857
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#500 » by C.lupus » Wed May 18, 2016 6:50 pm

Dunn's shot chart:
Image

Hield's shot chart:
Image

If you were an opposing NBA coach would you rather game plan against Dunn or Hield? What do you do with Dunn if a good defensive team takes away his left-handed drive and finish?

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves