DeBlazerRiddem wrote:Epicurus wrote:I don't understand how ball handling and passing from a center negates or sacrifices their defense. Why not a play making center who can make shots and play defense? I don't think Plumlee is that far from this Alvin Adams model of a center. Yes, he has work to do this offseason, but think he just may be committed to doing it.
Did you really think I meant it causally negates the defense, as in you literally cannot have both? Obviously I would love to have every single player 100% well rounded and elite in every aspect of the game, but that is not reality and in reality you have to prioritize which skills are most important at which position. Plumlee is near elite for a center in terms of his ability to handle and pass, but I would prefer my center to be near elite in terms of rebounding and all-around defense. This is not to say Plumlee is all that bad either, just that his best skillset does not typify what I want my center to be best at.
I think Plumlee would make more sense for a roster like Boston, where they have good defensive players up and down the roster but could use some playmaking to help IT's scoring and Smart/Bradley's defense at the guard positions. Blazers on the other hand have a defensively weak back-court, so we need as elite a defender up front as possible. Overall Biyombo is not as dynamic a player as Plumlee, but he would do a better job covering the back-court.
I also don't believe its an either/or situation with Plumlee/Biyombo - especially because the Warriors have proven that a front-court passer is a very valuable and winning skill to have. In fact, I do think it would be more difficult to have both Davis and Biyombo because of their similar strengths/weaknesses - so the real debate is whether Biyombo is enough of an upgrade over Davis to justify either moving Davis to 3rd string or trading him.
I think it's pretty clear what Stotts would do with a Biyombo on the team...play him at C, no matter what he did as a coach for a different team a decade ago. Biyombo would have to replace one of the current C's and that's Plumlee or Davis. Plumlee has that passing ability but he's RFA next summer; that might be a big consideration
whether it's Dwight Howard or Cole Adrich (the C i'd prefer over any but Howard or Whiteside), or Biyombo or Mahinmi, Portland doesn't have enough C minutes to keep all three C's happy.
is Biyombo an upgrade over Davis? Depends I guess. Davis is much better in win shares and win shares/48, box plus minus and value over replacement. That's mainly because Biyombo is a net negative on offense. Biyombo, even though more of a rim protector, doesn't beat Davis in defensive metrics
the guy who crushes them all in those advanced numbers is Aldridch. He's easily the biggest of several lesser C free agents. And even though there are sample size issues, he has some wow defensive numbers. Because of too few minutes his defensive rating of 94 isn't 'eligible', but it's worth noting that Whiteside leads the NBA in def rating at 94.5...worse then Aldrich's number. And DRPM which seems as reliable as any defensive stat shows Aldrich ranking 3rd among C's and 4th among all NBA players
and that sample size issue might work to Portland's advantage if they chose to chase Aldrich. He only averaged 13 minutes because he played behind the rarely injured Deandre Jordan. And it's pretty certain he'll opt out of his 1.2 million salary next season and look for more money in a situation that would give him a lot more minutes. Blazers could offer that. Toronto seems likely to try and keep Biyombo and Portland is a long ways from what Biyombo is used to