Jamaaliver wrote:Rip2137 wrote:...we would have beaten the Cavs if Love and Irving played. Their biggest weakness was defensively at the 1 and 4. Our best offensive players were at the 1-4. I [can't*] believe you have watched a 1-4 pick and roll against the Cavs and think we wouldn't have been better off with their better offensive team playing versus the elite defensive squad they were able to put out there.ATLHawksfan21 wrote:It's nice to see that others get it.ATLHawksfan21 wrote:You all saw on Saturday night why I said I wouldn't mind facing Cleveland in the playoffs with a healthy Kyrie and Love...Kyrie is a non-factor all the time and Love is a non-factor when Kyrie is playing.
So I mentioned a few weeks back that we might gain more clarity on this topic with time...
Ummm...Have we?
Serious question. I couldn't fathom that we thought that after being swept by LeBron and backups...that we'd fair better against LeBron and All Stars.
With 11 straight losses, under two different rookie Head Coaches, is it fair to acknowledge that CLE is simply a better team than ours? Even with a pair of limited defenders playing heavy minutes.
Nah bro, no clarity, KI is trash, Love is a bum. Korver > JR SMITH
LOL
I mean people see what they want to see. KI is just much more talented than any PG we have, period. Love is still REALLY REALLY good.














